Suppr超能文献

价值更低?:为何男性(以及女性)贬低以关怀为导向的职业。

Worth Less?: Why Men (and Women) Devalue Care-Oriented Careers.

作者信息

Block Katharina, Croft Alyssa, Schmader Toni

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Department of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 10;9:1353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01353. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

In the present research, we applied a goal-congruity perspective - the proposition that men and women seek out roles that afford their internalized values (Diekman et al., 2017) - to better understand the degree to which careers in healthcare, early education, and domestic roles (HEED; Croft et al., 2015) are devalued in society. Our first goal was to test the hypothesis that men, relative to women, are less interested in pursuing HEED careers in part because they are less likely than women to endorse communal values. A second, more novel goal was to extend goal congruity theory to examine whether gender differences in communal values also predict the belief that HEED careers add worth to society and are deserving of higher salaries. In three studies of undergraduate students (total = 979), we tested the predictive role of communal values (i.e., a focus on caring for others), as distinct from agentic values (i.e., a focus on status, competition, and wealth; Bakan, 1966). Consistent with goal congruity theory, Studies 1 and 2 revealed that men's lower interest in adopting HEED careers, such as nursing and elementary education, was partially mediated by men's (compared to women's) lower communal values. Extending the theory, all three studies also documented a general tendency to see HEED as having relatively lower worth to society compared to STEM careers. As expected, communal values predicted perceiving higher societal worth in HEED careers, as well as supporting increases in HEED salaries. Thus, gender differences in communal values accounted for men's (compared to women's) tendency to perceive HEED careers as having less societal worth and less deserving of salary increases. In turn, gender differences in perceived societal worth of HEED itself predicted men's relatively lower interest in pursuing HEED careers. In no instance, did agentic values better explain the gender difference in HEED interest or perceived worth. These findings have important implications for how we understand the value that society places on occupations typically occupied by women versus men.

摘要

在本研究中,我们运用了目标一致性视角——即男性和女性会寻求与他们内化价值观相符的角色这一观点(迪耶克曼等人,2017)——来更好地理解医疗保健、早期教育和家庭角色(HEED;克罗夫特等人,2015)等职业在社会中被贬低的程度。我们的首要目标是检验这样一个假设:相对于女性,男性对从事HEED职业的兴趣较低,部分原因是他们比女性更不可能认同社群价值观。第二个更新颖的目标是扩展目标一致性理论,以检验社群价值观方面的性别差异是否也预示着人们认为HEED职业对社会有价值且应获得更高薪酬的信念。在三项针对本科生的研究(共979名)中,我们检验了社群价值观(即关注关爱他人)与能动价值观(即关注地位、竞争和财富; Bakan,1966)的不同预测作用。与目标一致性理论一致,研究1和研究2表明,男性对从事护理和小学教育等HEED职业的兴趣较低,部分原因是男性(与女性相比)的社群价值观较低。扩展该理论后,所有三项研究还记录了一种普遍趋势,即与STEM职业相比,人们普遍认为HEED对社会的价值相对较低。不出所料,社群价值观预示着人们认为HEED职业具有更高的社会价值,也预示着支持提高HEED职业的薪酬。因此,社群价值观方面的性别差异解释了男性(与女性相比)认为HEED职业的社会价值较低且不应加薪的倾向。反过来,对HEED本身社会价值认知的性别差异预示着男性对从事HEED职业的兴趣相对较低。在任何情况下,能动价值观都不能更好地解释在HEED兴趣或感知价值方面的性别差异。这些发现对于我们如何理解社会对通常由女性和男性从事的职业所赋予的价值具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8552/6095964/e1796972b7ba/fpsyg-09-01353-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验