Hirschberger Gilad
Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Herzliya, Israel.
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 10;9:1441. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01441. eCollection 2018.
Collective trauma is a cataclysmic event that shatters the basic fabric of society. Aside from the horrific loss of life, collective trauma is also a crisis of meaning. The current paper systematically delineates the process that begins with a collective trauma, transforms into a collective memory, and culminates in a system of meaning that allows groups to redefine who they are and where they are going. For victims, the memory of trauma may be adaptive for group survival, but also elevates existential threat, which prompts a search for meaning, and the construction of a -generational collective self. For perpetrators, the memory of trauma poses a threat to collective identity that may be addressed by denying history, minimizing culpability for wrongdoing, transforming the memory of the event, closing the door on history, or accepting responsibility. The acknowledgment of responsibility often comes with disidentification from the group. The dissonance between historical crimes and the need to uphold a positive image of the group may be resolved, however, in another manner; it may prompt the creation of a new group narrative that acknowledges the crime and uses it as a backdrop to accentuate the current positive actions of the group. For both victims and perpetrators, deriving meaning from trauma is an ongoing process that is continuously negotiated within groups and between groups; it is responsible for debates over memory, but also holds the promise of providing a basis for intergroup understanding.
集体创伤是一种灾难性事件,它会破坏社会的基本结构。除了可怕的生命损失,集体创伤也是一种意义危机。本文系统地阐述了一个过程,这个过程始于集体创伤,转变为集体记忆,并最终形成一种意义体系,使群体能够重新定义自己是谁以及将走向何方。对于受害者而言,创伤记忆可能有助于群体生存,但也会加剧生存威胁,从而促使他们寻求意义,并构建代际集体自我。对于加害者来说,创伤记忆对集体身份构成威胁,这种威胁可以通过否认历史、将过错责任最小化、改变对事件的记忆、对历史关上大门或承担责任来应对。承认责任往往伴随着与群体的身份认同解离。然而,历史罪行与维护群体正面形象的需求之间的矛盾可能会以另一种方式得到解决;它可能会促使创造一种新的群体叙事,承认罪行并将其作为背景来突出群体当前的积极行动。对于受害者和加害者来说,从创伤中获取意义都是一个持续的过程,在群体内部和群体之间不断进行协商;它引发了关于记忆的争论,但也有望为群体间的理解提供基础。