Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.
Dev Psychol. 2018 Sep;54(9):1735-1744. doi: 10.1037/dev0000555.
Representations of social categories help us make sense of the social world, supporting predictions and explanations about groups and individuals. In an experiment with 156 participants, we explore whether children and adults are able to understand category-property associations (such as the association between "girls" and "liking pink") in structural terms, locating an object of explanation within a larger structure and identifying structural constraints that act on elements of the structure. We show that children as young as 3-4 years old show signs of structural thinking, and that 5-6-year-olds show additional differentiation between structural and nonstructural thinking, yet still fall short of adult performance. These findings introduce structural connections as a new type of nonaccidental relationship between a property and a category, and present a viable alternative to internalist accounts of social categories, such as psychological essentialism. (PsycINFO Database Record
社会类别代表帮助我们理解社会世界,支持对群体和个体的预测和解释。在一项有 156 名参与者的实验中,我们探索了儿童和成人是否能够以结构术语理解类别-属性关联(例如“女孩”和“喜欢粉色”之间的关联),在更大的结构中定位解释对象,并识别对结构元素起作用的结构约束。我们表明,年仅 3-4 岁的儿童就表现出结构思维的迹象,而 5-6 岁的儿童则表现出结构思维和非结构思维之间的额外分化,但仍不如成人表现出色。这些发现将结构联系引入到属性和类别之间的一种新的非偶然关系类型,并为社会类别(如心理本质主义)的内在主义解释提供了一种可行的替代方案。