Behaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 27;13(8):e0202793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202793. eCollection 2018.
Glassware design may affect drinking behaviour for alcoholic beverages, with glass shape and size influencing drinking speed and amount consumed. Uncertainty remains both about the extent to which these effects are restricted to alcohol and the underlying mechanisms. The primary aim of the current study was to examine the effect of differently shaped glasses on time taken to drink a soft drink. The secondary aim was to develop hypotheses about mechanisms concerning micro-drinking behaviours and perceptual effects.
In a single-session experiment, 162 participants were randomised to receive 330ml of carbonated apple juice in a glass that was either inward-sloped, straight-sided, or outward-sloped. The primary outcome measure was total drinking time. Secondary outcome measures included micro-drinking behaviours (sip size, sip duration, interval duration), and perceptual measures (midpoint bias, drink enjoyment).
Participants drank 21.4% faster from the outward-sloped glass than from the straight-sided glass [95%CI: 0.2%,38.0%] in adjusted models. They were also 18.2% faster from the inward-sloped glass than the straight-sided glass, but this did not reach statistical significance with wide confidence intervals also consistent with slower drinking [95%CI: -3.8%,35.6%]. Larger sips were associated with faster drinking times (Pearson's r(162) = -.45, p < .001). The direction of effects suggested sips were larger from the outward-sloped and inward-sloped glasses, compared to the straight-sided glass (15.1%, 95%CI: -4.3%,38.0%; 19.4%, 95%CI: -0.5%,43.6%, respectively). There were no significant differences between glasses in mean sip or interval duration. Bias in midpoint estimation was greater for the outward-sloped glass (12.9ml, 95%CI: 6.6ml,19.2ml) than for the straight-sided glass, although the degree of bias was not associated with total drinking time (Pearson's r(162) = 0.01, p = .87).
Individuals drank a soft drink more quickly from an outward-sloped glass, relative to a straight-sided glass. Micro-drinking behaviours, such as sip size, are promising candidates for underlying mechanisms.
玻璃器皿的设计可能会影响饮酒行为,酒杯的形状和大小会影响饮酒速度和饮酒量。这些影响是否仅限于酒精以及潜在机制仍存在不确定性。本研究的主要目的是检验不同形状的酒杯对饮用软饮料所需时间的影响。次要目的是提出关于微饮行为和感知效应的机制假设。
在一项单会话实验中,162 名参与者被随机分配到一个向内倾斜、直壁或向外倾斜的杯子中,各饮用 330ml 的碳酸苹果汁。主要结局测量是总饮用时间。次要结局测量包括微饮行为(小口大小、小口持续时间、间隔持续时间)和感知测量(中点偏差、饮用量)。
在调整后的模型中,参与者从向外倾斜的杯子中饮用的速度比从直壁杯子中快 21.4%[95%置信区间:0.2%,38.0%]。从向内倾斜的杯子中饮用的速度也比直壁杯子快 18.2%,但置信区间较宽,结果也与较慢的饮酒速度一致[95%置信区间:-3.8%,35.6%]。较大的小口与较快的饮酒时间相关(皮尔逊相关系数 r(162)=-.45,p<0.001)。从向外倾斜和向内倾斜的杯子中饮用时,小口较大,而从直壁杯子中饮用时小口较小(15.1%,95%置信区间:-4.3%,38.0%;19.4%,95%置信区间:-0.5%,43.6%)。三种杯子之间的平均小口和间隔持续时间无显著差异。对于向外倾斜的杯子,中点估计的偏差较大(12.9ml,95%置信区间:6.6ml,19.2ml),而对于直壁杯子则较小,但偏差程度与总饮用时间无关(皮尔逊相关系数 r(162)=0.01,p=0.87)。
与直壁杯子相比,个体从向外倾斜的杯子中更快地饮用软饮料。小口大小等微饮行为是潜在机制的有希望的候选者。