Suppr超能文献

血浆 Aβ42 作为遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者前驱期阿尔茨海默病进展的生物标志物:来自 PharmaCog/E-ADNI 研究的证据。

Plasma Aβ42 as a Biomarker of Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease Progression in Patients with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: Evidence from the PharmaCog/E-ADNI Study.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy.

Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Alzheimer's Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;69(1):37-48. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180321.

Abstract

It is an open issue whether blood biomarkers serve to diagnose Alzheimer's disease (AD) or monitor its progression over time from prodromal stages. Here, we addressed this question starting from data of the European FP7 IMI-PharmaCog/E-ADNI longitudinal study in amnesic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) patients including biological, clinical, neuropsychological (e.g., ADAS-Cog13), neuroimaging, and electroencephalographic measures. PharmaCog/E-ADNI patients were classified as "positive" (i.e., "prodromal AD" n = 76) or "negative" (n = 52) based on a diagnostic cut-off of Aβ42/P-tau in cerebrospinal fluid as well as APOE ε 4 genotype. Blood was sampled at baseline and at two follow-ups (12 and 18 months), when plasma amyloid peptide 42 and 40 (Aβ42, Aβ40) and apolipoprotein J (clusterin, CLU) were assessed. Linear Mixed Models found no significant differences in plasma molecules between the "positive" (i.e., prodromal AD) and "negative" groups at baseline. In contrast, plasma Aβ42 showed a greater reduction over time in the prodromal AD than the "negative" aMCI group (p = 0.048), while CLU and Aβ40 increased, but similarly in the two groups. Furthermore, plasma Aβ42 correlated with the ADAS-Cog13 score both in aMCI patients as a whole and the prodromal AD group alone. Finally, CLU correlated with the ADAS-Cog13 only in the whole aMCI group, and no association with ADAS-Cog13 was found for Aβ40. In conclusion, plasma Aβ42 showed disease progression-related features in aMCI patients with prodromal AD.

摘要

血液生物标志物是否可用于诊断阿尔茨海默病(AD),或者是否可用于监测从前驱期到疾病进展期的时间变化,这仍是一个悬而未决的问题。在这里,我们从欧洲 FP7 IMI-PharmaCog/E-ADNI 纵向研究中记忆障碍轻度认知障碍(aMCI)患者的数据出发,解决了这一问题,该研究包括生物标志物、临床、神经心理学(如 ADAS-Cog13)、神经影像学和脑电图测量。PharmaCog/E-ADNI 患者根据脑脊液 Aβ42/P-tau 和 APOE ε 4 基因型的诊断临界值分为“阳性”(即“前驱 AD”n = 76)或“阴性”(n = 52)。基线和两次随访(12 和 18 个月)时采集血液样本,评估血浆淀粉样蛋白肽 42 和 40(Aβ42、Aβ40)和载脂蛋白 J(载脂蛋白 J,CLU)。线性混合模型发现,在基线时,“阳性”(即前驱 AD)和“阴性”组之间的血浆分子没有显著差异。相反,前驱 AD 组的血浆 Aβ42 随时间的推移呈更大幅度的下降(p = 0.048),而 CLU 和 Aβ40 则增加,但两组的增加幅度相似。此外,血浆 Aβ42 与 ADAS-Cog13 评分在整个 aMCI 患者和前驱 AD 组中均呈相关性。最后,CLU 仅在整个 aMCI 组中与 ADAS-Cog13 相关,而 Aβ40 与 ADAS-Cog13 无相关性。综上所述,前驱 AD 的 aMCI 患者中,血浆 Aβ42 显示出与疾病进展相关的特征。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验