• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寻找答案:抑郁症网站在多大程度上解答了公众关于治疗选择的问题?

Searching for answers: How well do depression websites answer the public's questions about treatment choices?

机构信息

Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Manitoba, 363 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 0G1, Canada.

Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, P313 Duff Roblin Building, 190 Dysart Road, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jan;102(1):99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.019. Epub 2018 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.019
PMID:30150127
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate websites providing information on treatment for depression to the public, and to evaluate changes in the quality of website information over time.

METHODS

Websites (N = 25) addressing depression treatment were identified through the use of the Google search engine and by suggestions from healthcare professionals. Each website was evaluated based on the extent to which it addressed content areas deemed important by the public identified in previous research, overall quality as determined by the DISCERN, and reading level.

RESULTS

Overall, the quality of depression websites varied greatly. The majority of websites did not adequately answer the public's questions about treatment options, and presented higher quality information in the area of pharmacological treatments as compared to other treatment options. An average reading level of 10.0 was found across websites. Upon re-evaluation, only 14 of 25 websites added new content, and the majority of websites did not improve in their overall website quality (as measured by the DISCERN).

CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Websites could be improved by addressing important questions that consumers have concerning depression, as well as by creating higher quality content in the areas of psychological, neurotherapeutic, and alternative treatments.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估向公众提供抑郁症治疗信息的网站,并评估网站信息质量随时间的变化。

方法

通过使用谷歌搜索引擎和医疗保健专业人员的建议,确定了(研究中)涉及抑郁症治疗的网站。根据先前研究中公众认为重要的内容领域的涵盖程度、DISCERN 确定的整体质量以及阅读水平,对每个网站进行评估。

结果

总体而言,抑郁症网站的质量差异很大。大多数网站没有充分回答公众关于治疗选择的问题,并且在药理学治疗方面提供了比其他治疗选择更高质量的信息。在网站上发现的平均阅读水平为 10.0。重新评估时,只有 25 个网站中的 14 个添加了新内容,并且大多数网站的整体网站质量(通过 DISCERN 衡量)没有提高。

结论和实践意义

可以通过解决消费者对抑郁症的重要问题,以及在心理、神经治疗和替代治疗方面创建更高质量的内容来改进网站。

相似文献

1
Searching for answers: How well do depression websites answer the public's questions about treatment choices?寻找答案:抑郁症网站在多大程度上解答了公众关于治疗选择的问题?
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jan;102(1):99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.019. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
2
How well do websites concerning children's anxiety answer parents' questions about treatment choices?有关儿童焦虑症的网站在解答家长关于治疗选择的问题方面做得如何?
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;20(4):555-69. doi: 10.1177/1359104514534948. Epub 2014 May 14.
3
Quality of information on the Internet for Korean patients with inflammatory bowel disease.互联网上针对炎症性肠病韩国患者的信息质量。
Korean J Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(6):1215-1222. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2018.019. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
4
Readability and quality assessment of websites related to microtia and aural atresia.与小耳畸形和外耳道闭锁相关网站的可读性和质量评估。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Feb;79(2):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.11.027. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
5
What might parents read: Sorting webs of online information on vascular anomalies.家长们可能会阅读什么:梳理有关血管异常的在线信息网络。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Feb;93:63-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
6
Empowerment of Parents of Children With Craniosynostosis by Objective Scoring of Patient Information Websites.通过对患者信息网站进行客观评分增强颅缝早闭患儿家长的能力。
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Jun;27(4):874-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002623.
7
Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.评估有关吞咽障碍治疗的互联网信息来源的质量和可读性。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2017 Mar;96(3):128-138. doi: 10.1177/014556131709600312.
8
Evaluation of the Quality of Online Information for Patients with Rare Cancers: Thyroid Cancer.罕见癌症患者在线信息质量评估:甲状腺癌
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Oct;33(5):960-966. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1173-z.
9
What cancer patients find in the internet: the visibility of evidence-based patient information - analysis of information on German websites.癌症患者在互联网上找到的内容:基于证据的患者信息的可见性 - 对德国网站信息的分析。
Oncol Res Treat. 2015;38(5):212-8. doi: 10.1159/000381739. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
10
Patient Information Websites About Medically Induced Second-Trimester Abortions: A Descriptive Study of Quality, Suitability, and Issues.关于药物性中期妊娠流产的患者信息网站:质量、适用性及问题的描述性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 10;19(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6380.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the quality of depression-related information on Chinese websites and video platforms: a cross-sectional comparative analysis.中国网站和视频平台上抑郁症相关信息的质量评估:一项横断面比较分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 12;15:1408384. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1408384. eCollection 2024.
2
Internet search analysis on the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: What do people ask and read online?类风湿关节炎治疗的互联网搜索分析:人们在网上问了什么、看了什么?
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 22;18(9):e0285869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285869. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparative assessment of the information available on the treatment of depression over websites in English and Hindi language.
对英文和印地语网站上有关抑郁症治疗的现有信息进行比较评估。
Ind Psychiatry J. 2023 Jan-Jun;32(1):106-112. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_67_22. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
4
Quality of Late-Life Depression Information on the Internet: Website Evaluation Study.互联网上老年抑郁症信息的质量:网站评估研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 12;6(9):e36177. doi: 10.2196/36177.
5
The Quality of Internet Websites for People Experiencing Psychosis: Pilot Expert Assessment.为精神病患者提供的互联网网站质量:初步专家评估
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 15;6(4):e28135. doi: 10.2196/28135.
6
An evaluation of the quality of online perinatal depression information.在线围产期抑郁信息质量评估
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 15;22(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04320-4.
7
Exploring the Vast Choice of Question Prompt Lists Available to Health Consumers via Google: Environmental Scan.通过谷歌探索健康消费者可获取的大量问题提示列表:环境扫描。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 29;22(5):e17002. doi: 10.2196/17002.