• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

筑巢于洞穴的独居蜜蜂的花朵偏好和花粉传播网络:对农业环境计划设计的启示。

Flower preferences and pollen transport networks for cavity-nesting solitary bees: Implications for the design of agri-environment schemes.

作者信息

Gresty Catherine E A, Clare Elizabeth, Devey Dion S, Cowan Robyn S, Csiba Laszlo, Malakasi Panagiota, Lewis Owen T, Willis Katherine J

机构信息

Department of Zoology University of Oxford Oxford UK.

School of Biological and Chemical Sciences Queen Mary University of London London UK.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2018 Jul 7;8(15):7574-7587. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4234. eCollection 2018 Aug.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.4234
PMID:30151172
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6106195/
Abstract

Floral foraging resources are valuable for pollinator conservation on farmland, and their provision is encouraged by agri-environment schemes in many countries. Across Europe, wildflower seed mixtures are widely sown on farmland to encourage pollinators, but the extent to which key pollinator groups such as solitary bees exploit and benefit from these resources is unclear. We used high-throughput sequencing of 164 pollen samples extracted from the brood cells of six common cavity-nesting solitary bee species (, , , , and ) which are widely distributed across the UK and Europe. We documented their pollen use across 19 farms in southern England, UK, revealing their forage plants and examining the structure of their pollen transport networks. Of the 32 plant species included currently in sown wildflower mixes, 15 were recorded as present within close foraging range of the bees on the study farms, but only L. was identified within the pollen samples. L. was the most commonly found of the 23 plant species identified in the pollen samples, suggesting that, in addition to providing a nesting resource for leafcutter bees, it may be an important forage plant for these species. Higher levels of connectance and nestedness were characteristic of pollen transport networks on farms with abundant floral resources, which may increase resilience to species loss. Our data suggest that plant species promoted currently by agri-environment schemes are not optimal for solitary bee foraging. If a diverse community of pollinators is to be supported on UK and European farmland, additional species such as should be encouraged to meet the foraging requirements of solitary bees.

摘要

花卉觅食资源对于农田传粉者的保护具有重要价值,许多国家的农业环境计划都鼓励提供此类资源。在欧洲,野花种子混合物被广泛播种在农田上以吸引传粉者,但诸如独居蜂等关键传粉者群体利用这些资源并从中受益的程度尚不清楚。我们对从六种常见的筑巢于洞穴的独居蜂(、、、、和)的育雏细胞中提取的164个花粉样本进行了高通量测序,这些独居蜂广泛分布于英国和欧洲。我们记录了它们在英国英格兰南部19个农场的花粉利用情况,揭示了它们的觅食植物,并研究了它们的花粉传播网络结构。在目前播种的野花混合物中包含的32种植物物种中,有15种被记录在研究农场中蜜蜂近距离觅食范围内,但在花粉样本中仅鉴定出了L.。L.是在花粉样本中鉴定出的23种植物物种中最常见的,这表明,除了为切叶蜂提供筑巢资源外,它可能是这些物种重要的觅食植物。在拥有丰富花卉资源的农场中,花粉传播网络具有较高的连通性和嵌套性特征,这可能会增加对物种损失的恢复力。我们的数据表明,目前农业环境计划所推广的植物物种并非独居蜂觅食的最佳选择。如果要在英国和欧洲的农田中支持多样化的传粉者群落,应该鼓励引入诸如等其他物种以满足独居蜂的觅食需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ace/6106195/5cbf68f505dd/ECE3-8-7574-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ace/6106195/95b9164e70fd/ECE3-8-7574-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ace/6106195/5cbf68f505dd/ECE3-8-7574-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ace/6106195/95b9164e70fd/ECE3-8-7574-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ace/6106195/5cbf68f505dd/ECE3-8-7574-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Flower preferences and pollen transport networks for cavity-nesting solitary bees: Implications for the design of agri-environment schemes.筑巢于洞穴的独居蜜蜂的花朵偏好和花粉传播网络:对农业环境计划设计的启示。
Ecol Evol. 2018 Jul 7;8(15):7574-7587. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4234. eCollection 2018 Aug.
2
Non-target effects of agri-environmental schemes on solitary bees and fungi in the United Kingdom.农业环境计划对英国独居蜜蜂和真菌的非靶标影响。
Bull Entomol Res. 2022 Dec;112(6):734-744. doi: 10.1017/S0007485322000414. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
3
Diet characterisation of solitary bees on farmland: dietary specialisation predicts rarity.农田独居蜂的饮食特征:饮食特化预示着稀有性。
Biodivers Conserv. 2016;25(13):2655-2671. doi: 10.1007/s10531-016-1191-x. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
4
When beggars are choosers-How nesting of a solitary bee is affected by temporal dynamics of pollen plants in the landscape.当乞丐也有选择权——独居蜂的筑巢如何受景观中花粉植物时间动态的影响。
Ecol Evol. 2018 May 15;8(11):5777-5791. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4116. eCollection 2018 Jun.
5
Pollen metabarcoding reveals broad and species-specific resource use by urban bees.花粉宏条形码分析揭示了城市蜜蜂广泛且具有物种特异性的资源利用情况。
PeerJ. 2019 Feb 19;7:e5999. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5999. eCollection 2019.
6
Wildflower plantings promote blue orchard bee, (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), reproduction in California almond orchards.种植野花可促进加州杏仁果园中蓝果园蜂(膜翅目:切叶蜂科)的繁殖。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Feb 25;10(7):3189-3199. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5952. eCollection 2020 Apr.
7
Resource distributions among habitats determine solitary bee offspring production in a mosaic landscape.栖息地之间的资源分布决定了镶嵌景观中独居蜜蜂的后代产量。
Ecol Appl. 2007 Apr;17(3):910-21. doi: 10.1890/06-0269.
8
Fragmentation of nest and foraging habitat affects time budgets of solitary bees, their fitness and pollination services, depending on traits: Results from an individual-based model.巢穴和觅食栖息地的破碎化会影响独居蜜蜂的时间分配、健康状况及授粉服务,具体取决于其特性:基于个体模型的结果
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 14;13(2):e0188269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188269. eCollection 2018.
9
Environmentally acquired gut-associated bacteria are not critical for growth and survival in a solitary bee, .在独居蜜蜂中,从环境中获得的肠道相关细菌对于其生长和存活并不是至关重要的。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024 Sep 18;90(9):e0207623. doi: 10.1128/aem.02076-23. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
10
Specialist Osmia bees forage indiscriminately among hybridizing Balsamorhiza floral hosts.专业的熊蜂在杂交的柳兰属花的寄主植物中不加区分地觅食。
Oecologia. 2011 Sep;167(1):107-16. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-1977-1. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Pollen collection by the western honeybee and common eastern bumble bee foraging in a common landscape and applications for agri-environment schemes.西方蜜蜂和东部常见熊蜂在共同景观中采集花粉及其在农业环境计划中的应用
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Mar 5;12(3):240675. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240675. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Identification of potential insect ecological interactions using a metabarcoding approach.使用宏条形码方法识别潜在的昆虫生态相互作用。
PeerJ. 2025 Feb 17;13:e18906. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18906. eCollection 2025.
3
Chromosome-level genome assembly of Megachile sculpturalis Smith (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Megachilidae).

本文引用的文献

1
Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration.蜜蜂营养与花卉资源恢复。
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2015 Aug;10:133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 22.
2
Floral resource partitioning by individuals within generalised hoverfly pollination networks revealed by DNA metabarcoding.通过 DNA metabarcoding 揭示广义蝇类授粉网络中个体的花资源分区。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 23;8(1):5133. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23103-0.
3
DNA metabarcoding data unveils invisible pollination networks.DNA 代谢组条形码数据揭示了看不见的传粉网络。
雕翅隧蜂(膜翅目,蜜蜂总科,切叶蜂科)的染色体水平基因组组装
Sci Data. 2025 Jan 10;12(1):46. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-04385-2.
4
The genome sequence of the wood-carving leafcutter bee, (Kirby, 1802).木雕切叶蜂(Kirby,1802年)的基因组序列。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Mar 1;9:103. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21002.1. eCollection 2024.
5
Flower-bee versus pollen-bee metanetworks in fragmented landscapes.在破碎的景观中,花蜂与传粉蜂的并联网。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 May;291(2023):20232604. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2604. Epub 2024 May 29.
6
Seasonal and elevational changes of plant-pollinator interaction networks in East African mountains.东非山区植物-传粉者相互作用网络的季节和海拔变化。
Ecol Evol. 2023 May 11;13(5):e10060. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10060. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Biology, Genetic Diversity, and Conservation of Wild Bees in Tree Fruit Orchards.果园中野生蜜蜂的生物学、遗传多样性与保护
Biology (Basel). 2022 Dec 24;12(1):31. doi: 10.3390/biology12010031.
8
Increasing flower species richness in agricultural landscapes alters insect pollinator networks: Implications for bee health and competition.增加农业景观中的花卉物种丰富度会改变昆虫传粉者网络:对蜜蜂健康和竞争的影响。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Oct 27;12(10):e9442. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9442. eCollection 2022 Oct.
9
DNA metabarcoding identifies urban foraging patterns of oligolectic and polylectic cavity-nesting bees.DNA 代谢组条形码可识别寡食性和多食性穴居蜜蜂的城市觅食模式。
Oecologia. 2022 Dec;200(3-4):323-337. doi: 10.1007/s00442-022-05254-0. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
10
Plants, pollinators and their interactions under global ecological change: The role of pollen DNA metabarcoding.全球生态变化下的植物、传粉者及其相互作用:花粉 DNA metabarcoding 的作用。
Mol Ecol. 2023 Dec;32(23):6345-6362. doi: 10.1111/mec.16689. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 4;7(1):16828. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16785-5.
4
Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant-pollinator interactions.将花粉DNA宏条形码技术应用于植物-传粉者相互作用的研究。
Appl Plant Sci. 2017 Jun 12;5(6). doi: 10.3732/apps.1600124. eCollection 2017 Jun.
5
Using DNA metabarcoding to investigate honey bee foraging reveals limited flower use despite high floral availability.利用 DNA 代谢组学研究蜜蜂觅食行为发现,尽管有大量的花卉资源,但蜜蜂的花卉利用度有限。
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 16;7:42838. doi: 10.1038/srep42838.
6
A Comparison of Honey Bee-Collected Pollen From Working Agricultural Lands Using Light Microscopy and ITS Metabarcoding.利用光学显微镜和ITS元条形码技术对来自农业生产用地的蜜蜂采集花粉进行的比较
Environ Entomol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):38-49. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvw159.
7
Pollen DNA barcoding: current applications and future prospects.花粉DNA条形码:当前应用与未来前景
Genome. 2016 Sep;59(9):629-40. doi: 10.1139/gen-2015-0200. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
8
Using metabarcoding to reveal and quantify plant-pollinator interactions.利用宏条形码技术揭示和量化植物与传粉者的相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 3;6:27282. doi: 10.1038/srep27282.
9
How much flower-rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? Answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge.对野生传粉者而言,多少富含花卉的栖息地才足够?在知识不完整的情况下回答一个关键政策问题。
Ecol Entomol. 2015 Sep;40(Insects and Ecosystem Services 28th Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of LondonS1):22-35. doi: 10.1111/een.12226. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
10
Historical nectar assessment reveals the fall and rise of floral resources in Britain.历史花蜜评估揭示了英国花卉资源的兴衰。
Nature. 2016 Feb 4;530(7588):85-8. doi: 10.1038/nature16532.