• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

益生菌用于婴儿腹绞痛的管理:随机对照试验的系统评价

Probiotics for management of infantile colic: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Dryl Radoslaw, Szajewska Hanna

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Arch Med Sci. 2018 Aug;14(5):1137-1143. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.66055. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

DOI:10.5114/aoms.2017.66055
PMID:30154898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6111368/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Infantile colic is a common pediatric problem. The cause of infantile colic remains unclear. Treatment options are limited. Evidence suggests that probiotics might offer some benefit. The aim of the study was to systematically assess the effectiveness of probiotics supplementation in the management of infantile colic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2016 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of probiotics (any well-defined strain) compared with placebo for the management of infantile colic. The outcome measures of interest were treatment success and the duration of crying at the end of the intervention.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs (471 participants) were included. Compared with placebo the administration of DSM 17938 at a daily dose of 10 CFU was associated with the treatment success (relative risk = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.10-2.81, number needed to treat 5, 95% CI: 4-8) and reduced crying times at the end of the intervention (mean difference: -49 min, 95% CI: -66 to -33); however, the effect was mainly seen in exclusively breastfed infants. Other probiotics (single or in combinations) were studied in single trials only.

CONCLUSIONS

Some probiotics, primarily DSM 17938, may be considered for the management of infantile colic. Data on other probiotics are limited.

摘要

引言

婴儿腹绞痛是常见的儿科问题。婴儿腹绞痛的病因尚不清楚。治疗选择有限。有证据表明益生菌可能有益处。本研究的目的是系统评估补充益生菌治疗婴儿腹绞痛的有效性。

材料与方法

检索了截至2016年4月的MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆,以查找评估益生菌(任何明确菌株)与安慰剂相比治疗婴儿腹绞痛疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。感兴趣的结局指标是治疗成功率和干预结束时的哭闹持续时间。

结果

纳入了7项RCT(471名参与者)。与安慰剂相比,每日剂量为10CFU的DSM 17938给药与治疗成功相关(相对风险=1.67,95%CI:1.10-2.81,需治疗人数5,95%CI:4-8),且干预结束时哭闹时间减少(平均差异:-49分钟,95%CI:-66至-33);然而,这种效果主要见于纯母乳喂养的婴儿。其他益生菌(单一或联合使用)仅在单项试验中进行了研究。

结论

一些益生菌,主要是DSM 17938,可考虑用于婴儿腹绞痛的治疗。关于其他益生菌的数据有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bde7/6111368/d87649b8c8b4/AMS-14-29510-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bde7/6111368/c08ffacced6f/AMS-14-29510-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bde7/6111368/8e2a48c04075/AMS-14-29510-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bde7/6111368/29110519aefd/AMS-14-29510-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bde7/6111368/d87649b8c8b4/AMS-14-29510-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bde7/6111368/c08ffacced6f/AMS-14-29510-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bde7/6111368/8e2a48c04075/AMS-14-29510-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bde7/6111368/29110519aefd/AMS-14-29510-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bde7/6111368/d87649b8c8b4/AMS-14-29510-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Probiotics for management of infantile colic: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.益生菌用于婴儿腹绞痛的管理:随机对照试验的系统评价
Arch Med Sci. 2018 Aug;14(5):1137-1143. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.66055. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
2
Probiotics to prevent infantile colic.预防婴儿腹绞痛的益生菌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 13;3(3):CD012473. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012473.pub2.
3
Probiotics for infantile colic: a systematic review.益生菌治疗婴儿肠绞痛:系统评价。
BMC Pediatr. 2013 Nov 15;13:186. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-186.
4
Probiotics for infantile colic: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigating Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938.罗特氏乳杆菌 DSM 17938 治疗婴儿绞痛的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Pediatr. 2015 Jan;166(1):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.09.020. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
5
Probiotics to prevent or treat excessive infant crying: systematic review and meta-analysis.益生菌预防或治疗婴儿过度哭闹的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Dec;167(12):1150-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2572.
6
The Efficacy and Safety of the Probiotic Bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 for Infantile Colic: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.益生菌罗伊氏乳杆菌DSM 17938治疗婴儿腹绞痛的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 28;10(10):e0141445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141445. eCollection 2015.
7
Dietary modifications for infantile colic.婴儿腹绞痛的饮食调整
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 10;10(10):CD011029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011029.pub2.
8
Probiotics for the Treatment of Infantile Colic: A Systematic Review.益生菌治疗婴儿腹绞痛:一项系统评价
J Pharm Pract. 2017 Jun;30(3):366-374. doi: 10.1177/0897190016634516. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
9
Probiotics for infantile colic: Is there evidence beyond doubt? A meta-analysis and systematic review.益生菌治疗婴儿肠绞痛:是否有毋庸置疑的证据?一项荟萃分析和系统综述。
Acta Paediatr. 2024 Feb;113(2):170-182. doi: 10.1111/apa.17036. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
10
A systematic review of prevention and treatment of infantile colic.婴儿腹绞痛防治的系统评价
Acta Paediatr. 2020 Sep;109(9):1733-1744. doi: 10.1111/apa.15247. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Limosilactobacillus reuteri UBLRu-87 in Infantile Colic and Its Symptoms: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.罗伊氏乳杆菌UBLRu - 87对婴儿腹绞痛及其症状的疗效:一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Cureus. 2025 Apr 7;17(4):e81856. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81856. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
The Impact of Bioactive Molecules from Probiotics on Child Health: A Comprehensive Review.益生菌生物活性分子对儿童健康的影响:全面综述。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 30;16(21):3706. doi: 10.3390/nu16213706.
3
Probiotics in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.

本文引用的文献

1
Infant Colic-What works: A Systematic Review of Interventions for Breast-fed Infants.婴儿腹绞痛的有效疗法:对母乳喂养婴儿干预措施的系统评价
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016 May;62(5):668-86. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001075.
2
Prevalence and Health Outcomes of Functional Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Infants From Birth to 12 Months of Age.出生至12个月龄婴儿功能性胃肠症状的患病率及健康结局
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015 Nov;61(5):531-7. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000949.
3
Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG therapy and microbiological programming in infantile colic: a randomized, controlled trial.
功能性胃肠病中的益生菌。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1449:157-174. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-58572-2_10.
4
Beneficial Effects of PBS072 and BB077 on Mood Imbalance, Self-Confidence, and Breastfeeding in Women during the First Trimester Postpartum.PBS072 和 BB077 对产后第一季度情绪失衡、自信心和母乳喂养的有益影响。
Nutrients. 2023 Aug 9;15(16):3513. doi: 10.3390/nu15163513.
5
DSM 17938-Containing Infant Formulas and the Associations with Gastrointestinal Tolerance: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.含 DSM 17938 的婴儿配方奶粉与胃肠道耐受性的关系:一项横断面观察性研究。
Nutrients. 2023 Jan 19;15(3):530. doi: 10.3390/nu15030530.
6
Supporting the diagnosis of infantile colic by a point of care measurement of fecal calprotectin.通过即时检测粪便钙卫蛋白辅助诊断婴儿腹绞痛。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Sep 29;10:978545. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.978545. eCollection 2022.
7
The effect of symbiotic in the treatment of infantile colic: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.共生菌治疗婴儿腹绞痛的效果:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。
J Res Med Sci. 2022 May 30;27:42. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_128_21. eCollection 2022.
8
Nine-Strain Bacterial Synbiotic Improves Crying and Lowers Fecal Calprotectin in Colicky Babies-An Open-Label Randomized Study.九菌株复合益生菌改善肠绞痛婴儿的哭闹并降低粪便钙卫蛋白——一项开放标签随机研究
Microorganisms. 2022 Feb 12;10(2):430. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020430.
9
Diagnosis and Treatment Approaches in Infantile Colic (IC): Results of a Survey Among Paediatricians in Turkey.婴儿腹绞痛(IC)的诊断与治疗方法:土耳其儿科医生的一项调查结果
Front Pediatr. 2021 Dec 23;9:779997. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.779997. eCollection 2021.
10
A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2.两种用于系统评价概述评估工具的比较:ROBIS 与 AMSTAR-2。
Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 25;10(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01819-x.
鼠李糖乳杆菌GG益生菌疗法与婴儿腹绞痛的微生物编程:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatr Res. 2015 Oct;78(4):470-5. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.127. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
4
Effectiveness of Lactobacillus reuteri in infantile colic and colicky induced maternal depression: a prospective single blind randomized trial.罗伊氏乳杆菌对婴儿腹绞痛及腹绞痛引发的母亲抑郁的疗效:一项前瞻性单盲随机试验
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015 Jun;107(6):1547-53. doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0448-9. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
5
Probiotics for infantile colic: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigating Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938.罗特氏乳杆菌 DSM 17938 治疗婴儿绞痛的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Pediatr. 2015 Jan;166(1):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.09.020. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
6
Synbiotic in the management of infantile colic: a randomised controlled trial.合生元用于治疗婴儿腹绞痛:一项随机对照试验
J Paediatr Child Health. 2014 Oct;50(10):801-5. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12640. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
7
Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic.专家共识文件。国际益生菌和益生元科学协会关于益生菌术语的范围和适当使用的共识声明。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Aug;11(8):506-14. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
8
Looking for new treatments of Infantile Colic.寻找婴儿肠绞痛的新疗法。
Ital J Pediatr. 2014 Jun 5;40:53. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-40-53.
9
The efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in infants and children: a review of the current evidence.罗伊氏乳杆菌DSM 17938对婴幼儿的疗效:当前证据综述
Eur J Pediatr. 2014 Oct;173(10):1327-37. doi: 10.1007/s00431-014-2328-0. Epub 2014 May 13.
10
Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial.用益生菌鼠李糖乳杆菌治疗婴儿肠绞痛:双盲、安慰剂对照随机试验。
BMJ. 2014 Apr 1;348:g2107. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2107.