Makaloski Vladimir, Tsilimparis Nikolaos, Rohlffs Fiona, Heidemann Franziska, Debus Eike Sebastian, Kölbel Tilo
Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 May;7(3):380-388. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.04.02.
During the last 20 years, a clear shift has been observed towards thoracic endovascular aortic repair for different aortic pathologies. However, total endovascular repair of the aortic arch remains technically demanding. Simultaneous perfusion of all supra-aortic arteries without longer cerebral ischemia time, whilst trying to avoid cerebral embolization, labels endovascular aortic arch repair with highest level of technical difficulty and surgical expertise. The aim of this article is to present an overview of the current technical options for endovascular aortic arch repair and their early results. Currently, early results are reported from four endovascular arch replacement techniques: hybrid repair, total endovascular approach, chimney grafts and in-situ fenestration. The early results of these different arch replacement techniques are promising, especially the total arch replacement with custom-made fenestrated or branched stent-grafts. Long-term results are unknown, and larger series results and comparative studies are needed to determine safety and efficacy.
在过去20年中,针对不同的主动脉病变,人们明显转向了胸主动脉腔内修复术。然而,主动脉弓的全腔内修复在技术上仍然具有挑战性。在试图避免脑栓塞的同时,要实现所有主动脉弓上动脉的同步灌注且不延长脑缺血时间,这使得主动脉弓腔内修复术具有最高的技术难度和手术专业要求。本文旨在概述当前主动脉弓腔内修复的技术选择及其早期结果。目前,有四种主动脉弓腔内置换技术报告了早期结果:杂交修复、全腔内入路、烟囱式移植物和原位开窗术。这些不同的主动脉弓置换技术的早期结果很有前景,尤其是使用定制的开窗或分支型支架移植物进行全弓置换。长期结果尚不清楚,需要更大规模的系列研究结果和比较研究来确定其安全性和有效性。