Prada Paola A, Furton Kenneth G
Department of Environmental Toxicology, Institute for Forensic Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, International Forensic Research Institute, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Aug 14;5:188. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00188. eCollection 2018.
While canines are generally considered the gold standard for olfactory detection in many situations other animals provide alternatives and offer a unique opportunity to compare biological detection capabilities. Critical components in successfully studying biological detectors is not only understanding their anatomical evidence for olfaction, but also, understanding the life history of the species to better direct the potential of an olfactory task. Here, a brief overview is provided presenting a comparative viewpoint on the use of odors by birds and canines over a range of unique detection scenarios. Similar to canines, birds use olfactory information in various natural oriented contexts where odors are dispersed over a widespread spatial range. Comparing these two distinctive animal models, and current trends in physiological and behavioral assessments may open the door for novel uses of birds as biological sensors in forensic applications.
虽然在许多情况下犬类通常被视为嗅觉检测的黄金标准,但其他动物也提供了替代方案,并为比较生物检测能力提供了独特的机会。成功研究生物探测器的关键因素不仅在于了解它们嗅觉的解剖学证据,还在于了解该物种的生活史,以便更好地挖掘嗅觉任务的潜力。在此,我们提供一个简要概述,从比较的角度介绍鸟类和犬类在一系列独特检测场景中对气味的利用。与犬类类似,鸟类在各种自然环境中利用嗅觉信息,这些环境中气味分布在广泛的空间范围内。比较这两种独特的动物模型以及当前生理和行为评估的趋势,可能为鸟类在法医应用中作为生物传感器的新用途打开大门。