Tamber-Rosenau Benjamin J, Asplund Christopher L, Marois René
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee.
Department of Psychology, University of Houston , Houston, Texas.
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Nov 1;120(5):2498-2512. doi: 10.1152/jn.00506.2018. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
The posterior lateral prefrontal cortex-specifically, the inferior frontal junction (IFJ)-is thought to exert a key role in the control of attention. However, the precise nature of that role remains elusive. During the voluntary deployment and maintenance of visuospatial attention, the IFJ is typically coactivated with a core dorsal network consisting of the frontal eye field and superior parietal cortex. During stimulus-driven attention, IFJ instead couples with a ventrolateral network, suggesting that IFJ plays a role in attention distinct from the dorsal network. Because IFJ rapidly switches activation patterns to accommodate conditions of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention (Asplund CL, Todd JJ, Snyder AP, Marois R. Nat Neurosci 13: 507-512, 2010), we hypothesized that IFJ's primary role is to dynamically reconfigure attention rather than to maintain attention under steady-state conditions. This hypothesis predicts that in a goal-directed visuospatial cuing paradigm IFJ would transiently deploy attention toward the cued location, whereas the dorsal attention network would maintain attentional weights during the delay between cue and target presentation. Here we tested this hypothesis with functional magnetic resonance imaging while subjects were engaged in a Posner cuing task with variable cue-target delays. Both IFJ and dorsal network regions were involved in transient processes, but sustained activity was far more evident in the dorsal network than in IFJ. These results support the account that IFJ primarily acts to shift attention whereas the dorsal network is the main locus for the maintenance of stable attentional states. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Goal-directed visuospatial attention is controlled by a dorsal fronto-parietal network and lateral prefrontal cortex. However, the relative roles of these regions in goal-directed attention are unknown. Here we present evidence for their dissociable roles in the transient reconfiguration and sustained maintenance of attentional settings: while maintenance of attentional settings is confined to the dorsal network, the configuration of these settings at the beginning of an attentional episode is a function of lateral prefrontal cortex.
前额叶皮层后外侧区域——具体而言,是额下回交界区(IFJ)——被认为在注意力控制中发挥关键作用。然而,该作用的确切性质仍不清楚。在视觉空间注意力的自愿部署和维持过程中,IFJ通常与由额叶眼区和顶上叶皮层组成的核心背侧网络共同激活。在刺激驱动的注意力过程中,IFJ反而与腹外侧网络耦合,这表明IFJ在注意力中发挥的作用与背侧网络不同。由于IFJ会迅速切换激活模式以适应目标导向和刺激驱动的注意力条件(阿斯普伦德CL、托德JJ、斯奈德AP、马鲁瓦R。《自然神经科学》13:507 - 512,2010),我们假设IFJ的主要作用是动态重新配置注意力,而不是在稳态条件下维持注意力。该假设预测,在目标导向的视觉空间线索范式中,IFJ会将注意力短暂地部署到线索提示的位置,而背侧注意力网络会在线索和目标呈现之间的延迟期间维持注意力权重。在这里,我们在受试者进行具有可变线索 - 目标延迟的波斯纳线索任务时,用功能磁共振成像测试了这一假设。IFJ和背侧网络区域都参与了短暂过程,但背侧网络中的持续活动比IFJ中明显得多。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即IFJ主要作用是转移注意力,而背侧网络是维持稳定注意力状态的主要场所。新发现与值得注意之处 目标导向的视觉空间注意力由背侧额顶网络和外侧前额叶皮层控制。然而,这些区域在目标导向注意力中的相对作用尚不清楚。在这里,我们提供了证据,证明它们在注意力设置的短暂重新配置和持续维持中具有可分离的作用:虽然注意力设置的维持局限于背侧网络,但在注意力事件开始时这些设置的配置是外侧前额叶皮层的功能。