Suppr超能文献

在现实世界中患有急性心力衰竭的患者中,与左心室射血分数(LVEF)保留的患者相比,中等范围的LVEF与1年随访期间较高的全因死亡率相关:一项单中心倾向评分匹配分析。

The midrange left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is associated with higher all-cause mortality during the 1-year follow-up compared to preserved LVEF among real-world patients with acute heart failure: a single-center propensity score-matched analysis.

作者信息

Borovac Josip Anđelo, Novak Katarina, Bozic Josko, Glavas Duska

机构信息

Department of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2, 21000, Split, Croatia.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 1, 21000, Split, Croatia.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2019 Feb;34(2):268-278. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1249-7. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

Abstract

The objectives of the study were to characterize and compare different acute heart failure (AHF) subgroups according to left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in terms of all-cause mortality and HF-related readmissions during the 1-year follow-up (FU). Three hundred and fifty-six AHF patients admitted to Cardiology ward and/or CCU were retrospectively included in the study and analyzed during the 1-year FU. Patients were stratified according to LVEF as those with preserved (HFpEF), midrange (HFmrEF) and reduced LVEF (HFrEF). During the FU period, 148 (43.3%) patients died, and 116 HF-related readmission events were recorded. HFmrEF group had significantly higher standardized all-cause mortality rate, unadjusted for age, compared to HFpEF group and significantly lower than HFrEF group (41 vs. 18 and 41 vs. 62.5 events per 100 patient-years; χ = 41.08, p < 0.001 and χ = 16.62, p < 0.001, respectively). A propensity score-matched analysis in which all HF groups were matched for age and other covariates confirmed that HFmrEF group had significantly higher all-cause mortality rate than HFpEF group (χ = 15.66, p < 0.001) while no significant differences in readmission rates were observed across all groups (p = NS). The hazard risk for a composite endpoint of death and readmission was highest in HFrEF group (HR 6.53, 95% CI 3.53-12.08, p < 0.001), followed by HFmrEF group (HR 3.30, 95% CI 1.86-5.87, p < 0.001) when compared to HFpEF group set as a reference. Among AHF patients, the HFmrEF phenotype was associated with significantly higher all-cause mortality compared to HFpEF, during the 1-year FU. This finding might implicate more stringent clinical approach towards this patient group.

摘要

本研究的目的是根据左心室射血分数(LVEF)对不同的急性心力衰竭(AHF)亚组进行特征描述和比较,分析其在1年随访期(FU)内的全因死亡率和心力衰竭相关再入院情况。356例入住心内科病房和/或冠心病监护病房的AHF患者被纳入本研究并进行回顾性分析,随访期为1年。患者根据LVEF被分层为射血分数保留(HFpEF)、射血分数中度降低(HFmrEF)和射血分数降低(HFrEF)。在随访期间,148例(43.3%)患者死亡,记录到116次心力衰竭相关再入院事件。与HFpEF组相比,HFmrEF组年龄未调整的标准化全因死亡率显著更高,且显著低于HFrEF组(每100患者年分别为41例对18例和41例对62.5例;χ² = 41.08,p < 0.001和χ² = 16.62,p < 0.001)。一项倾向评分匹配分析中,所有心力衰竭组在年龄和其他协变量上进行匹配,结果证实HFmrEF组的全因死亡率显著高于HFpEF组(χ² = 15.66,p < 0.001),而所有组的再入院率未观察到显著差异(p = 无统计学意义)。与作为参照的HFpEF组相比,HFrEF组死亡和再入院复合终点的风险最高(风险比6.53,95%置信区间3.53 - 12.08,p < 0.001),其次是HFmrEF组(风险比3.30,95%置信区间1.86 - 5.87,p < 0.001)。在AHF患者中,与HFpEF相比,HFmrEF表型在1年随访期内全因死亡率显著更高。这一发现可能意味着对该患者群体需要采取更严格的临床治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验