• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展并验证 Colquitt 的组织公正度量的波兰语版本。

Development and validation of the Polish version of Colquitt’s Organizational Justice Measure.

机构信息

Central Institute for Labour Protection – National Research Institute (CIOP-PIB), Warszawa, Poland (Department of Social Psychology).

出版信息

Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2018 Jul 4;31(4):415-427. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01187. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

DOI:10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01187
PMID:30160091
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Organizational justice is an important predictor of employees’ well-being and job performance. Colquitt’s Organizational Justice Measure (OJM) was designed to assess four aspects of justice – distributive, procedural, interpersonal and informational. The lack of a Polish version of the tool, however, has precluded its application in Poland. The objective of this study was to test the psychometric properties of the OJM in a Polish sample.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The validating study was conducted on 2 participant samples (N = 209 and N = 659), employed in public and private companies. Both the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) as well as the estimation of internal consistency with Cronbach’s α method were conducted. Predictive validity was assessed by correlating organizational justice with job-related factors and outcomes, including job resources and counterproductive work behavior.

RESULTS

The EFA and CFA supported a 4-dimension model of the OJM Polish version. This model indicated a better fit to data than the alternatively tested 1-factor, 2-factor and 3-factor models. The internal consistency of the scales was satisfactory, ranging 0.81–0.93 for various subscales. As expected, the overall organizational justice and the four subscales correlated positively with job resources and negatively with counterproductive work behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

The Polish version of OJM has satisfactory psychometric properties and may be useful in assessing organizational justice in a Polish setting. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2018;31(4):415–427

摘要

目的

组织公平是员工福祉和工作绩效的重要预测因素。考奎特的组织公平度量(OJM)旨在评估公平的四个方面——分配、程序、人际和信息。然而,由于缺乏波兰语版本的工具,该工具无法在波兰使用。本研究的目的是在波兰样本中测试 OJM 的心理测量特性。

材料与方法

验证研究采用了两个参与者样本(N=209 和 N=659),他们在公共和私营公司工作。进行了探索性和验证性因素分析(EFA、CFA)以及 Cronbach α 法的内部一致性估计。通过与与工作相关的因素和结果(包括工作资源和反生产工作行为)相关联来评估预测有效性。

结果

EFA 和 CFA 支持 OJM 波兰语版本的 4 维度模型。与替代测试的 1 因素、2 因素和 3 因素模型相比,该模型更适合数据。量表的内部一致性令人满意,各种子量表的范围为 0.81-0.93。正如预期的那样,总体组织公平和四个子量表与工作资源呈正相关,与反生产工作行为呈负相关。

结论

OJM 的波兰语版本具有令人满意的心理测量特性,可用于评估波兰的组织公平。国际职业医学与环境卫生杂志 2018 年;31(4):415-427

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the Polish version of Colquitt’s Organizational Justice Measure.发展并验证 Colquitt 的组织公正度量的波兰语版本。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2018 Jul 4;31(4):415-427. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01187. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
2
Spanish version of Colquitt's Organizational Justice Scale.科尔奎特组织公正量表的西班牙语版本。
Psicothema. 2014;26(4):538-44. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2014.110.
3
Polish adaptation of three self-report measures of job stressors: the Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, the Quantitative Workload Inventory and the Organizational Constraints Scale.三种工作压力源自我报告量表的波兰语改编版:工作人际冲突量表、工作量定量量表和组织约束量表。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016;22(1):32-9. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1116816.
4
The factorial structure of job-related affective well-being: Polish adaptation of the Warr's measure.工作相关情感幸福感的因子结构:沃的测量方法的波兰语适应性。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2018 Jul 4;31(4):429-443. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01178. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
5
Psychometric properties of a four-component Norwegian Organizational Justice Scale.一份四分量表式挪威组织公正量表的心理测量特性。
Psychol Rep. 2012 Apr;110(2):571-88. doi: 10.2466/01.08.14.PR0.110.2.571-588.
6
EXAMINING THE DIMENSIONALITY OF COLQUITT'S ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE SCALE IN A PUBLIC HEALTH SECTOR CONTEXT.在公共卫生部门背景下检验科尔奎特组织公正量表的维度
Psychol Rep. 2015 Jun;116(3):723-37. doi: 10.2466/01.PR0.116k26w0. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
7
Development and validity of the Japanese version of the organizational justice scale.组织公正量表的日文版的发展与有效性。
Ind Health. 2010;48(1):66-73. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.48.66.
8
Developing a short measure of organizational justice: a multisample health professionals study.开发组织公正的简短衡量标准:一项多样本卫生专业人员研究。
J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Nov;52(11):1068-74. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181f8447c.
9
[Psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI)].[《奥尔登堡倦怠量表(OLBI)波兰语版的心理测量学特性》]
Med Pr. 2016;67(1):29-41. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00353.
10
[Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) - Psychometric properties of selected scales in the Polish version].[哥本哈根心理社会问卷(COPSOQ)——波兰语版所选量表的心理测量特性]
Med Pr. 2017 May 16;68(3):329-348. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00443. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions among young ICU nurses: a model based on the job demands-resources theory.年轻重症监护室护士的情绪耗竭与离职意愿:基于工作要求-资源理论的模型
BMC Nurs. 2025 Feb 6;24(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02765-y.
2
Organizational Justice and Health: A Survey in Hospital Workers.组织公正与健康:医院工作者调查
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 8;19(15):9739. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159739.