POLARIS, Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield , Sheffield , United Kingdom.
Pulmonary Imaging Laboratory, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Nov 1;125(5):1526-1535. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00500.2017. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
Two magnetic resonance specific ventilation imaging (SVI) techniques, namely, oxygen-enhanced proton (OE-H) and hyperpolarized He (HP-He), were compared in eight healthy supine subjects [age 32 (6) yr]. An in-house radio frequency coil array for H configured with the He transmit-receive coil in situ enabled acquisition of SVI data from two nuclei from the same slice without repositioning the subjects. After 3 × 3 voxel downsampling to account for spatial registration errors between the two SV images, the voxel-by-voxel correlation coefficient of two SV maps ranged from 0.11 to 0.63 [0.46 mean (0.17 SD); P < 0.05]. Several indexes were analyzed and compared from the tidal volume-matched SV maps: the mean of SV log-normal distribution (SVmean), the standard deviation of the distribution as a measure of SV heterogeneity (SVwidth), and the gravitational gradient (SVslope). There were no significant differences in SVmean [OE-H: 0.28 (0.08) and HP-He: 0.32 (0.14)], SVwidths [OE-H: 0.28 (0.08) and HP-He: 0.27 (0.10)], and SVslopes [OE-H: -0.016 (0.006) cm and HP-He: -0.013 (0.007) cm]. Despite the statistical similarities of the population averages, Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated large individual intertechnique variability. SDs of differences in these indexes were 42% (SVmean), 46% (SVwidths), and 62% (SVslopes) of their corresponding overall mean values. The present study showed that two independent, spatially coregistered, SVI techniques presented a moderate positive voxel-by-voxel correlation. Population averages of SVmean, SVwidth, and SVslope were in close agreement. However, the lack of agreement when the data sets were analyzed individually might indicate some fundamental mechanistic differences between the techniques. NEW & NOTEWORTHY To the best of our knowledge, this is the first cross-comparison of two different specific ventilation (SV) MRI techniques in the human lung (i.e., oxygen-enhanced proton and hyperpolarized He). The present study showed that two types of spatially coregistered SV images presented a modest positive correlation. The two techniques also yielded similar population averages of SV indexes such as log-normal mean, SV heterogeneity, and the gravitational slope, albeit with some intersubject variability.
两种磁共振特定通气成像(SVI)技术,即氧增强质子(OE-H)和超极化氦(HP-He),在 8 名健康仰卧受试者[年龄 32(6)岁]中进行了比较。一个内部射频线圈阵列用于 H,与原位的 He 发射-接收线圈相结合,能够在不重新定位受试者的情况下从同一切片中采集来自两个核的 SVI 数据。在对两个 SV 图像之间的空间配准误差进行 3×3 体素下采样后,两个 SV 图的体素间相关系数范围为 0.11 至 0.63[0.46 均值(0.17 SD);P<0.05]。从潮气量匹配的 SV 图中分析和比较了几个指标:SV 对数正态分布的平均值(SVmean)、分布的标准差作为 SV 异质性的度量(SVwidth)和重力梯度(SVslope)。SVmean[OE-H:0.28(0.08)和 HP-He:0.32(0.14)]、SVwidths[OE-H:0.28(0.08)和 HP-He:0.27(0.10)]和 SVslopes[OE-H:-0.016(0.006)cm 和 HP-He:-0.013(0.007)cm]之间没有显著差异。尽管群体平均值具有统计学相似性,但 Bland-Altman 分析显示个体间技术差异较大。这些指标差异的 SD 分别为其相应总体平均值的 42%(SVmean)、46%(SVwidths)和 62%(SVslopes)。本研究表明,两种独立的、空间配准的 SVI 技术呈现出适度的正体素间相关性。SVmean、SVwidth 和 SVslope 的群体平均值非常接近。然而,当逐个分析数据集时缺乏一致性可能表明这两种技术之间存在一些基本的机制差异。本研究首次对人体肺部的两种不同的特定通气(SV)MRI 技术进行了交叉比较(即氧增强质子和超极化氦)。本研究表明,两种类型的空间配准 SV 图像呈适度正相关。这两种技术还产生了类似的 SV 指数的群体平均值,如对数正态均值、SV 异质性和重力斜率,尽管存在一些个体间的变异性。