• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科内镜医师协会普通外科内镜医师培训课程:对外科内镜进一步发展的一项有价值投资。

The SAGES flexible endoscopy course for fellows: a worthwhile investment in furthering surgical endoscopy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences/Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD, 20889, USA.

Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1189-1195. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6395-6. Epub 2018 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-018-6395-6
PMID:30167950
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The SAGES flexible endoscopy course for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fellows improves confidence and skills in performing gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. This study evaluated the long-term retention of these confidence levels and investigated how fellows changed practices within their fellowships due to the course.

METHODS

Participating MIS fellows completed surveys 6 months after the course. Respondents rated their confidence to independently perform 16 endoscopic procedures (1 = not at all; 5 = very), barriers to use of endoscopy, and current uses of endoscopy. Respondents also noted participation in additional skills courses and status of fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) certification. Comparisons of responses from the immediate post-course survey to the 6-month follow-up survey were examined. McNemar and paired t tests were used for analyses.

RESULTS

23 of 57 (40%) course participants returned to the 6-month survey. No major barriers to endoscopy use were identified. Fellows reported less competition with GI providers as a barrier to practice compared to their original post-course expectations (50% vs. 86%, p < 0.01). In addition, confidence was maintained in performing the majority of the 16 endoscopic procedures, although fellows reported significant decreases in confidence in independently performing snare polypectomy (- 26%; p < 0.05), control of variceal bleeding (- 39%; p < 0.05), colonic stenting (- 48%; p < 0.01), BARRX (- 40%; p < 0.05), and TIF (- 31%; p < 0.05). Fewer fellows used the GI suite to manage surgical problems than was anticipated post course (26% vs. 74%, p < 0.01). Fellows who passed FES noted no significant loss of independence, changes in use, or barriers to use. 18% made additional partnerships with industry after the course. 41% stated flexible endoscopy has influenced their post-fellowship job choice.

CONCLUSIONS

The SAGES flexible endoscopy course for MIS fellows results in long-term practice changes with participating fellows maintaining confidence to perform the majority of taught endoscopic procedures 6 months later. Additionally, fellows experienced no major barriers to implementing endoscopy into practice.

摘要

背景

SAGES 微创外科内镜课程可提高学员进行胃肠内镜检查的信心和技能。本研究评估了这些信心水平的长期保持情况,并探讨了学员因该课程而如何改变其在培训中的实践。

方法

参加微创外科培训的学员在课程结束后 6 个月完成了调查。受访者对独立进行 16 项内镜检查程序的能力进行评分(1=一点也不;5=非常),并对内镜使用的障碍以及当前内镜使用情况进行评分。受访者还记录了参加额外技能课程的情况以及内镜手术基础(FES)认证的状态。比较课程结束后即刻调查和 6 个月随访调查的回复。采用 McNemar 和配对 t 检验进行分析。

结果

57 名课程参与者中有 23 名(40%)返回了 6 个月的调查。没有发现内镜使用的主要障碍。与最初课程结束后的预期相比,学员报告说与 GI 提供者竞争不再是实践的障碍(50%对 86%,p<0.01)。此外,大多数 16 项内镜检查程序的操作能力得到了保持,尽管学员报告说在独立进行圈套息肉切除术(-26%;p<0.05)、控制静脉曲张出血(-39%;p<0.05)、结肠支架置入术(-48%;p<0.01)、BARRX(-40%;p<0.05)和 TIF(-31%;p<0.05)方面的信心显著下降。与课程结束后的预期相比,学员较少使用 GI 套房来处理手术问题(26%对 74%,p<0.01)。通过 FES 认证的学员表示,他们没有失去独立性、使用变化或使用障碍。课程结束后,18%的学员与行业建立了额外的合作伙伴关系。41%的学员表示,内镜检查影响了他们在培训后的工作选择。

结论

SAGES 微创外科内镜课程可使学员长期保持实践变化,参与课程的学员在 6 个月后仍保持对所学内镜检查程序的大部分操作信心。此外,学员在将内镜纳入实践中没有遇到重大障碍。

相似文献

1
The SAGES flexible endoscopy course for fellows: a worthwhile investment in furthering surgical endoscopy.外科内镜医师协会普通外科内镜医师培训课程:对外科内镜进一步发展的一项有价值投资。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1189-1195. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6395-6. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
2
Changing attitudes and improving skills: demonstrating the value of the SAGES flexible endoscopy course for fellows.转变态度与提升技能:展示SAGES灵活内镜课程对学员的价值。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):147-152. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4944-4. Epub 2016 May 2.
3
Passing the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) exam: linking specialty choice and attitudes about endoscopic surgery to success.通过内镜手术基础(FES)考试:将专业选择和对内镜手术的态度与成功联系起来。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):225-228. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5663-1. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
4
SAGES Advanced GI/MIS fellowship redesign: pilot results and adoption of new standards.SAGES 高级胃肠/微创外科奖学金重新设计:试点结果和新标准的采用。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):3056-3061. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06899-4. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
5
Minimally invasive surgery fellows would perform a wider variety of cases in their "ideal" fellowship.微创外科研究员在他们“理想的”进修项目中会处理更多种类的病例。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):650-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9430-6.
6
Perception versus reality: elucidating motivation and expectations of current fellowship council minimally invasive surgery fellows.认知与现实:阐明当前 fellowship 理事会微创外科研究员的动机和期望。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4422-4427. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6184-2. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
7
Evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2012 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Continuing Education Committee.胃肠外科和内镜手术实践差距的演变:美国胃肠内镜外科医师学会(SAGES)继续教育委员会 2012 年报告。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4429-38. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3263-2. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
8
Endoscopic training in gastroenterology fellowship: adherence to core curriculum guidelines.胃肠病学专科培训中的内镜培训:遵循核心课程指南
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3570-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4110-4. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
9
Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES?目前外科住院医师和胃肠病学研究员的培训是否足以通过粪便弹性蛋白酶检测(FES)?
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):352-358. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4979-6. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
10
SAGES's advanced GI/MIS fellowship curriculum pilot project.SAGES 高级胃肠/微创外科奖学金课程试点项目。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2613-2619. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6020-8. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopy training in Australia during COVID-19: Efficacy and knowledge assessment of gastroenterology and general surgery trainees.COVID-19 期间澳大利亚的内镜培训:胃肠病学和普通外科住院医师的疗效与知识评估
JGH Open. 2022 Nov 8;6(12):869-875. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12835. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Changing attitudes and improving skills: demonstrating the value of the SAGES flexible endoscopy course for fellows.转变态度与提升技能:展示SAGES灵活内镜课程对学员的价值。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):147-152. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4944-4. Epub 2016 May 2.
2
Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys.探索医生专科医生对基于网络的调查的回应率。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Apr 9;15:32. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0016-z.
3
Colonoscopy performance correlates with scores on the FES™ manual skills test.结肠镜检查操作表现与FES™手动技能测试得分相关。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Nov;28(11):3081-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3583-x. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
4
Why fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES)?为什么是内镜手术基础(FES)?
Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):701-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3299-3. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
5
What surgical skills rural surgeons need to master.乡村外科医师需要掌握的外科技能。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Nov;217(5):919-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
6
General surgery workloads and practice patterns in the United States, 2007 to 2009: a 10-year update from the American Board of Surgery.美国普通外科手术工作量和实践模式,2007 年至 2009 年:美国外科学会 10 年更新。
Ann Surg. 2011 Sep;254(3):520-5; discussion 525-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822cd175.
7
Retention of laparoscopic procedural skills acquired on a virtual-reality surgical trainer.腹腔镜手术技能在虚拟现实手术训练器上的保持。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Mar;25(3):722-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1233-5. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
8
Objective assessment of surgical decision making in trauma after a laboratory-based course: durability of cognitive skills.基于实验室课程后创伤手术决策的客观评估:认知技能的持久性
Am J Surg. 2008 May;195(5):599-602; discussion 602-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.035. Epub 2008 Apr 2.