School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
J Anim Sci. 2018 Nov 21;96(11):4552-4561. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky314.
Farm animals raised under free-range (FR) systems are assumed to have improved welfare and higher-quality products that are better to eat than intensively reared animals. However, the modulations are limited in scientific investigations. In this study, we compared 2 rearing systems (FR and cage) and their effects on chickens, including production performance, product quality, body condition, physiological indicators, and gene expression. By using a match-mismatch design in which each treatment was transferred to the other treatment during the last period of the experiment, we aimed to understand the influence of current and former rearing conditions and the ability of individuals to adapt to the current environment. The results indicated that the FR system led to better chicken welfare (e.g., gait score, feather condition, and physiological indicators, P < 0.05) and contributed to higher product quality (P < 0.05), although it resulted in poorer production performance (P < 0.05) and foot pad condition (P < 0.05) than that of the cage rearing system. Additionally, the FR system triggered a series of inner changes and genetic responses in chickens, such as the upregulation of calcium and GnRH signaling, actin and cytoskeleton regulations, immune functions, and developmental processes, and the downregulation of pathological regulations (q-value < 0.05 for all gene ontology terms and P < 0.05 for all Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways). In conclusion, rearing systems alter chicken gene expression patterns, which provide a genetic basis for the adaptability to rearing environments and ultimately affects chicken welfare and products.
散养(FR)系统下饲养的农场动物被认为具有改善的福利和更高质量的产品,比集约化饲养的动物更好吃。然而,这些变化在科学研究中受到限制。在这项研究中,我们比较了两种饲养系统(FR 和笼养)及其对鸡的影响,包括生产性能、产品质量、身体状况、生理指标和基因表达。通过使用匹配-不匹配设计,每个处理在实验的最后阶段转移到另一个处理,我们旨在了解当前和以前的饲养条件的影响以及个体适应当前环境的能力。结果表明,FR 系统导致更好的鸡福利(例如,步态评分、羽毛状况和生理指标,P < 0.05),并有助于提高产品质量(P < 0.05),尽管它导致较差的生产性能(P < 0.05)和脚垫状况(P < 0.05)比笼养系统。此外,FR 系统在鸡中引发了一系列内在变化和基因反应,例如钙和 GnRH 信号、肌动蛋白和细胞骨架调节、免疫功能和发育过程的上调,以及病理调节的下调(所有基因本体术语的 q 值<0.05 且所有京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)途径的 P 值<0.05)。总之,饲养系统改变了鸡的基因表达模式,为适应饲养环境提供了遗传基础,并最终影响鸡的福利和产品。