Suppr超能文献

膀胱尿路上皮癌整块切除术(EBRUC):一项欧洲多中心研究,比较激光和电切整块经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的安全性、有效性和结果。

En bloc resection of urothelium carcinoma of the bladder (EBRUC): a European multicenter study to compare safety, efficacy, and outcome of laser and electrical en bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor.

作者信息

Kramer Mario W, Rassweiler Jens J, Klein Jan, Martov Alexey, Baykov Nikolay, Lusuardi Lukas, Janetschek Günter, Hurle Rodolfo, Wolters Mathias, Abbas Mahmoud, von Klot Christoph A, Leitenberger Armin, Riedl Markus, Nagele Udo, Merseburger Axel S, Kuczyk Markus A, Babjuk Marko, Herrmann Thomas R W

机构信息

Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.

Department of Urology, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2015 Dec;33(12):1937-43. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1568-6. Epub 2015 Apr 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

En bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) may improve staging quality and perioperative morbidity and influence tumor recurrence. This study was designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and recurrence rates of electrical versus laser en bloc resection of bladder tumors.

METHODS

This European multicenter study included 221 patients at six academic hospitals. Transurethral ERBT was performed with monopolar/bipolar current or holmium/thulium laser energy. Staging quality measured by detrusor muscle involvement, various perioperative parameters, and 12-month follow-up data was analyzed.

RESULTS

Electrical and laser ERBT were used to treat 156 and 65 patients, respectively. Median tumor size was 2.1 cm; largest tumor was 5 cm. Detrusor muscle was present in 97.3 %. A switch to conventional TURBT was significantly more frequent in the electrical ERBT group (26.3 vs. 1.5 %, p < 0.001). Median operation duration (25 min), postoperative irrigation (1 day), catheterization time (2 days), and hospitalization (3 days) were similar. Overall complication rate was low (Clavien ≥ 3, n = 6 [2.7 %]). Hemoglobin was significantly lower after electrical ERBT (p = 0.0013); however, overall hemoglobin loss was not clinically relevant (0.38 g/dl). Patients (n = 148) were followed for 12 months; 33 (22.3 %) had recurrences. In total, 63.6 % recurrences occurred outside the ERBT resection field. No difference was noted between ERBT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ERBT is safe and reliable regardless of the energy source and provides high-quality resections of tumors >1 cm. Recurrence rates did not differ between groups, and the majority of recurrences occurred outside the ERBT resection field.

摘要

目的

膀胱肿瘤整块切除术(ERBT)可能会提高分期质量、降低围手术期发病率并影响肿瘤复发。本研究旨在评估电切与激光整块切除膀胱肿瘤的安全性、有效性及复发率。

方法

这项欧洲多中心研究纳入了6家学术医院的221例患者。经尿道ERBT采用单极/双极电流或钬/铥激光能量进行。分析了通过逼尿肌受累情况衡量的分期质量、各种围手术期参数及12个月的随访数据。

结果

电切和激光ERBT分别用于治疗156例和65例患者。肿瘤中位大小为2.1 cm;最大肿瘤为5 cm。97.3%的病例存在逼尿肌。电切ERBT组转为传统经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)的情况明显更频繁(26.3%对1.5%,p<0.001)。中位手术时长(25分钟)、术后冲洗时间(1天)、导尿时间(2天)及住院时间(3天)相似。总体并发症发生率较低(Clavien≥3级,n = 6[2.7%])。电切ERBT后血红蛋白明显更低(p = 0.0013);然而,总体血红蛋白丢失在临床上并无显著意义(0.38 g/dl)。148例患者接受了12个月的随访;33例(22.3%)出现复发。总共63.6%的复发发生在ERBT切除范围之外。ERBT组之间未发现差异。

结论

无论能量来源如何,ERBT都是安全可靠的,并且能对直径>1 cm的肿瘤进行高质量切除。两组的复发率无差异,且大多数复发发生在ERBT切除范围之外。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验