• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钬激光整块切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的安全性、可行性和质量。

Safety, feasibility, and quality of thulium laser en-bloc resection for treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Kasr Alainy hospitals, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Dec;55(12):3103-3109. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03752-5. Epub 2023 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-023-03752-5
PMID:37639155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10611837/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trans-Urethral Resection of Bladder Tumors (TURBT) is a critical step in diagnosis, staging and treatment of bladder tumors. Conventional TURBT (cTURBT) involves the electro-resection of the tumor into small fragments. This technique leads to concerns about the completeness of resection, under-staging, bleeding, cancer cell implantation, and most importantly, risk of tumour recurrence. To circumvent this, laser en-bloc resection of bladder tumors has been introduced.

OBJECTIVES

Assessment of the safety, feasibility, and quality of Thulium Laser En-bloc Resection of Tumors (TmL-ERBT) for treatment of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) in various urinary bladder walls as a primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints were to investigate the feasibility of thulium laser use in the re-staging cystoscopy and to evaluate the learning curve of TmL-ERBT.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study including all newly diagnosed patients, above 18 years old, with a urinary bladder mass ≤ 4 cm in maximal dimension (measured via bladder ultrasound or CT or MRI). All patients underwent TmL-ERBT under regional anaesthesia in a lithotomy position. All intraoperative complications such as obturator nerve reflex, bladder perforation, and significant bleeding were recorded. Postoperative variables such as the mean catheterization time, bladder irrigation fluid volume and duration, and the mean of hospital stay as well as the postoperative complications were recorded. All patients were risk stratified and managed according to EUA guidelines then followed by a surveillance regimen per 3 months for 6 months.

RESULTS

The study included 23 patients with a mean age of 53 ± 15.8 years. While 15 patients (65%) had a single tumor, the rest had multiple tumors, ranging from 2 to 3 in number with a total of 36 lesions. No cases required conversion to cTURBT and none of them experienced obturator nerve reflex or bladder perforation. Only one patient (4.3%) had an attack of clot urine retention. The mean hospitalization time was 31.2 ± 14.4 h and the mean catheterization time was 20.4 ± 13.3 h. The Detrusor muscle was present in 20 patients (87%) and the remaining 3 patients required a re-staging cystoscopy which was performed efficiently using thulium laser. None of the treated patients developed tumour recurrence during the follow-up period. In analysis, the duration of complete resection of 2-4 cm tumours was 23-27 min after the 7th case with a resection rate of 0.12-0.15 cm/min.

CONCLUSION

TmL-ERBT is safe and feasible for complete resection of NMIBC with a short learning curve and adequate cancer control.

摘要

背景

经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)是诊断、分期和治疗膀胱肿瘤的关键步骤。传统的 TURBT(cTURBT)涉及到用电切术将肿瘤切成小块。这种技术导致了对切除的完整性、分期不足、出血、癌细胞种植以及最重要的肿瘤复发风险的担忧。为了解决这个问题,已经引入了膀胱肿瘤的钬激光整块切除术。

目的

评估经尿道钬激光整块切除术(TmL-ERBT)治疗非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的安全性、可行性和质量,作为主要终点。次要终点是研究钬激光在重新分期膀胱镜检查中的可行性,并评估 TmL-ERBT 的学习曲线。

方法

这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,纳入了所有新诊断的、年龄在 18 岁以上的、最大尺寸为≤4cm 的膀胱肿块患者(通过膀胱超声、CT 或 MRI 测量)。所有患者均在局部麻醉下以截石位行 TmL-ERBT。记录所有术中并发症,如闭孔神经反射、膀胱穿孔和明显出血。记录术后变量,如平均导尿管时间、膀胱冲洗液量和持续时间、平均住院时间以及术后并发症。所有患者均根据 EUA 指南进行风险分层和管理,然后根据随访方案每 3 个月随访 6 个月。

结果

该研究纳入了 23 名平均年龄为 53±15.8 岁的患者。15 名患者(65%)有单个肿瘤,其余患者有多个肿瘤,数量从 2 到 3 个不等,共 36 个病灶。没有病例需要转换为 cTURBT,也没有病例出现闭孔神经反射或膀胱穿孔。只有 1 名患者(4.3%)出现血尿潴留。平均住院时间为 31.2±14.4 小时,平均导尿管时间为 20.4±13.3 小时。20 名患者(87%)的逼尿肌存在,其余 3 名患者需要进行重新分期膀胱镜检查,该检查使用钬激光有效地进行。在随访期间,没有接受治疗的患者出现肿瘤复发。在第 7 例患者后,2-4cm 肿瘤的完全切除时间为 23-27 分钟,切除率为 0.12-0.15cm/min。

结论

TmL-ERBT 安全可行,可用于完全切除 NMIBC,学习曲线短,癌症控制效果好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4635/10611837/898a5bfec523/11255_2023_3752_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4635/10611837/f47ef9c80ec3/11255_2023_3752_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4635/10611837/0d5bb012cc84/11255_2023_3752_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4635/10611837/e48956ba31a4/11255_2023_3752_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4635/10611837/ed5bcc4936d1/11255_2023_3752_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4635/10611837/f4dad222c613/11255_2023_3752_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4635/10611837/898a5bfec523/11255_2023_3752_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4635/10611837/f47ef9c80ec3/11255_2023_3752_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4635/10611837/0d5bb012cc84/11255_2023_3752_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4635/10611837/e48956ba31a4/11255_2023_3752_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4635/10611837/ed5bcc4936d1/11255_2023_3752_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4635/10611837/f4dad222c613/11255_2023_3752_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4635/10611837/898a5bfec523/11255_2023_3752_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety, feasibility, and quality of thulium laser en-bloc resection for treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.钬激光整块切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的安全性、可行性和质量。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Dec;55(12):3103-3109. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03752-5. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
2
Thulium laser en bloc resection reduces recurrence rates in NMIBC patients with tumor diameters ≥3cm compared to transurethral resection: a non-randomized controlled study.钬激光整块切除术与经尿道切除术相比,可降低肿瘤直径≥3cm 的非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者的复发率:一项非随机对照研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):1239. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13022-x.
3
Prospective non-randomized comparison of transurethral laser en bloc resection vs. conventional resection of bladder tumors larger than 3 cm.经尿道激光整块切除术与传统切除术治疗大于 3cm 的膀胱肿瘤的前瞻性非随机比较。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024 Aug;76(4):436-441. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05682-9.
4
En bloc resection of urothelium carcinoma of the bladder (EBRUC): a European multicenter study to compare safety, efficacy, and outcome of laser and electrical en bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor.膀胱尿路上皮癌整块切除术(EBRUC):一项欧洲多中心研究,比较激光和电切整块经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的安全性、有效性和结果。
World J Urol. 2015 Dec;33(12):1937-43. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1568-6. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
5
A retrospective comparison of thulium laser en bloc resection of bladder tumor and plasmakinetic transurethral resection of bladder tumor in primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.原发性非肌层浸润性膀胱癌中钬激光整块切除膀胱肿瘤与等离子体动力经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的回顾性比较
Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Feb;34(1):85-92. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2604-8. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
6
En Bloc Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Noninferiority Trial.整块切除与传统经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗膀胱肿瘤的单中心前瞻性随机非劣效性试验。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Aug;5(4):440-448. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.05.001. Epub 2022 May 23.
7
Safety and efficacy of thulium laser resection of bladder tumors versus transurethral resection of bladder tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.钬激光与经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗膀胱肿瘤的安全性和有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Dec;36(9):1807-1816. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03272-7. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
8
Efficiency of transurethral en-bloc resection vs. conventional transurethral resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: An umbrella review.经尿道整块切除术与传统经尿道切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的疗效比较:一项伞状综述。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jun;13(11):e7323. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7323.
9
Safety, feasibility, and quality of holmium laser resection of nonmuscle invasive bladder tumors - A single-center experience.钬激光切除非肌层浸润性膀胱肿瘤的安全性、可行性及质量——单中心经验
Indian J Urol. 2020 Apr-Jun;36(2):106-111. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_348_19. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
10
Comparison of Thulium Laser Resection of Bladder Tumors and Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.钬激光与经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的比较。
Urol Int. 2022;106(2):116-121. doi: 10.1159/000514042. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Applications and future prospects of laser technologies in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.激光技术在非肌层浸润性膀胱癌治疗中的应用及未来前景
Bladder (San Franc). 2025 Jun 5;12(3):e21200050. doi: 10.14440/bladder.2025.0004. eCollection 2025.
2
Neoadjuvant therapy plus thulium laser transurethral bladder tumor resection for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.新辅助治疗联合铥激光经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌
Bladder (San Franc). 2025 Jun 5;12(3):e21200053. doi: 10.14440/bladder.2024.0065. eCollection 2025.
3
Current laser application in En bloc resection of bladder tumor- a narrative literature review.

本文引用的文献

1
Thulium laser resection versus conventional transurethral resection of urinary bladder tumor: A comparative prospective study.铥激光切除与传统经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的比较前瞻性研究。
Urol Ann. 2023 Jan-Mar;15(1):88-94. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_59_22. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
2
Thulium Fiber Laser: Bringing Lasers to a Whole New Level.铥光纤激光器:将激光提升至全新水平。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Dec 20;48:31-33. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.07.007. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
When to Avoid a Restaging Procedure for Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer? Inferences from a Tertiary Care Center.
当前激光在膀胱肿瘤整块切除术中的应用——一篇叙述性文献综述
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 26;23(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03815-0.
4
Thulium laser-based hemostasis during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective observational multicentric study.经皮肾镜取石术中基于铥激光的止血:一项前瞻性观察性多中心研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 May;57(5):1403-1414. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04298-w. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
何时应避免对非肌层浸润性膀胱癌进行再分期手术?来自三级医疗中心的推断。
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep;13(3):604-611. doi: 10.1007/s13193-022-01516-8. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
4
Clinical rationale and safety of restaging transurethral resection in indication-stratified patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.高危非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者分层指征下再次经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的临床原理和安全性。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan 15;16(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1310-0.
5
Current Evidence of Transurethral En-bloc Resection of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.经尿道整块切除非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的当前证据。
Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Dec;3(6):567-576. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.12.004. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
6
Green-light laser en bloc resection for primary non-muscle-invasive bladder tumor versus transurethral electroresection: A prospective, nonrandomized two-center trial with 36-month follow-up.绿光激光整块切除治疗原发性非肌层浸润性膀胱肿瘤与经尿道电切术的比较:一项前瞻性、非随机双中心试验及36个月随访
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Nov;48(9):859-865. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22565. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
7
"En Bloc" Resection of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Prospective Single-center Study.非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的整块切除:一项前瞻性单中心研究
Urology. 2016 Apr;90:126-30. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
8
Two Micrometer Continuous-Wave Thulium Laser Treating Primary Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Is It Feasible? A Randomized Prospective Study.两微米连续波铥激光治疗原发性非肌层浸润性膀胱癌:可行吗?一项随机前瞻性研究。
Photomed Laser Surg. 2015 Oct;33(10):517-23. doi: 10.1089/pho.2015.3913. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
9
Thulium Laser Endoscopic En Bloc Enucleation of Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.铥激光内镜整块剜除非肌层浸润性膀胱癌
J Endourol. 2015 Nov;29(11):1258-62. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0336. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
10
Technical solutions to improve the management of non-muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma: summary of a European Association of Urology Section for Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Section for Uro-Oncology (ESOU) expert meeting and current and future perspectives.改善非肌肉浸润性移行细胞癌管理的技术解决方案:欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)泌尿外科技术分会(ESUT)和泌尿肿瘤学分会(ESOU)专家会议的总结,以及当前和未来的观点。
BJU Int. 2015 Jan;115(1):14-23. doi: 10.1111/bju.12664. Epub 2014 Jul 14.