Cheung Mike W-L
Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 17;9:1387. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01387. eCollection 2018.
In the social and behavioral sciences, it is recommended that effect sizes and their sampling variances be reported. Formulas for common effect sizes such as standardized and raw mean differences, correlation coefficients, and odds ratios are well known and have been well studied. However, the statistical properties of multivariate effect sizes have received less attention in the literature. This study shows how structural equation modeling (SEM) can be used to compute multivariate effect sizes and their sampling covariance matrices. We focus on the standardized mean difference (multiple-treatment and multiple-endpoint studies) with or without the assumption of the homogeneity of variances (or covariance matrices) in this study. Empirical examples were used to illustrate the procedures in R. Two computer simulation studies were used to evaluate the empirical performance of the SEM approach. The findings suggest that in multiple-treatment and multiple-endpoint studies, when the assumption of the homogeneity of variances (or covariance matrices) is questionable, it is preferable not to impose this assumption when estimating the effect sizes. Implications and further directions are discussed.
在社会科学和行为科学中,建议报告效应量及其抽样方差。诸如标准化均值差异、原始均值差异、相关系数和比值比等常见效应量的公式广为人知且已得到充分研究。然而,多变量效应量的统计特性在文献中受到的关注较少。本研究展示了如何使用结构方程模型(SEM)来计算多变量效应量及其抽样协方差矩阵。在本研究中,我们关注标准化均值差异(多处理和多终点研究),无论是否假设方差(或协方差矩阵)齐性。通过实证例子来说明在R语言中的操作步骤。使用了两项计算机模拟研究来评估SEM方法的实证性能。研究结果表明,在多处理和多终点研究中,当方差(或协方差矩阵)齐性假设存疑时,在估计效应量时最好不要强加此假设。文中还讨论了相关影响和进一步的方向。