• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者的血红蛋白 A 检测时间与激励性支付有关:对英国初级保健数据的分析。

Timings for HbA testing in people with diabetes are associated with incentive payments: an analysis of UK primary care data.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2019 Jan;36(1):36-43. doi: 10.1111/dme.13810. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1111/dme.13810
PMID:30175871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6519368/
Abstract

AIMS

Guidelines recommend testing HbA every 3-6 months in people with diabetes. In the United Kingdom (UK), primary care clinics are financially incentivized to monitor HbA at least annually and report proportions of patients meeting targets on 31 March. We explored the hypothesis that this reporting deadline may be associated with over-frequent or delayed HbA testing.

METHODS

This analysis used HbA results from 100 000 people with diabetes during 2005-2014 in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink UK primary care database. Logistic regression was used to explore whether the four months prior to the deadline for quality reporting (December to March) or individual's previous HbA were aligned with retesting HbA within 60 days or > 1 year from the previous test, and identify other factors associated with the timing of HbA testing.

RESULTS

Retesting HbA within 60 days or > 1 year was more common in December to March compared with other months of the year (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.08 for retesting within 60 days). Those with higher HbA were more likely to have a repeat test within 60 days and less likely to have a repeat test > 1 year from the previous test.

CONCLUSIONS

We have found that retesting HbA within 60 days and > 1 year from the previous test was more common in December to March compared with the other months of the year. This work suggests that both practice-centred administrative factors and patient-centred considerations may be influencing diabetes care in the UK.

摘要

目的

指南建议每 3-6 个月对糖尿病患者进行一次 HbA 检测。在英国(UK),初级保健诊所因经济激励而被要求每年至少监测一次 HbA,并在 3 月 31 日报告达到目标的患者比例。我们探讨了这样一种假设,即该报告截止日期可能与 HbA 检测过于频繁或延迟有关。

方法

本分析使用了来自英国临床实践研究数据链接(Clinical Practice Research Datalink UK)初级保健数据库中 2005 年至 2014 年期间 10 万名糖尿病患者的 HbA 结果。使用逻辑回归来探讨截止日期前的四个月(12 月至 3 月)或个体之前的 HbA 是否与在之前检测后 60 天内或超过 1 年内再次检测 HbA 相关,并确定与 HbA 检测时间相关的其他因素。

结果

与一年中的其他月份相比,在 12 月至 3 月期间更有可能在 60 天内或超过 1 年内再次检测 HbA(在 60 天内再次检测的比值比为 1.06,95%置信区间为 1.04-1.08)。HbA 较高的人更有可能在 60 天内再次进行检测,而不太可能在之前的检测后 1 年以上再次进行检测。

结论

我们发现,与一年中的其他月份相比,在 12 月至 3 月期间,在 60 天内和超过 1 年从上次检测后再次检测 HbA 的情况更为常见。这项工作表明,以实践为中心的管理因素和以患者为中心的考虑因素都可能会影响英国的糖尿病治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fea5/6519368/c22a8677793d/DME-36-36-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fea5/6519368/c22a8677793d/DME-36-36-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fea5/6519368/c22a8677793d/DME-36-36-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Timings for HbA testing in people with diabetes are associated with incentive payments: an analysis of UK primary care data.糖尿病患者的血红蛋白 A 检测时间与激励性支付有关:对英国初级保健数据的分析。
Diabet Med. 2019 Jan;36(1):36-43. doi: 10.1111/dme.13810. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
2
Variation in Point-of-Care Testing of HbA1c in Diabetes Care in General Practice.在一般实践中糖尿病护理中即时 HbA1c 检测的变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 9;14(11):1363. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111363.
3
Low annual frequency of HbA testing in people with Type 2 diabetes in primary care practices in Germany.德国初级保健实践中 2 型糖尿病患者 HbA 检测的年度频率较低。
Diabet Med. 2018 Feb;35(2):249-254. doi: 10.1111/dme.13556. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
4
Glycemic Control and Risk of Infections Among People With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes in a Large Primary Care Cohort Study.一项大型初级保健队列研究中 1 型或 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制与感染风险。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Oct;41(10):2127-2135. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0287. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
5
Glycaemic, weight, and blood pressure changes associated with early versus later treatment intensification with dapagliflozin in United Kingdom primary care patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.在英国初级保健环境中,与早期与晚期使用达格列净强化治疗相比,2 型糖尿病患者的血糖、体重和血压变化。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Sep;155:107791. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107791. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
6
Persistent C-peptide is associated with reduced hypoglycaemia but not HbA in adults with longstanding Type 1 diabetes: evidence for lack of intensive treatment in UK clinical practice?长期 1 型糖尿病成人患者中,持续 C 肽与低血糖减少相关,但与 HbA 无关:英国临床实践中缺乏强化治疗的证据?
Diabet Med. 2019 Sep;36(9):1092-1099. doi: 10.1111/dme.13960. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
7
A randomised controlled trial to compare minimally invasive glucose monitoring devices with conventional monitoring in the management of insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (MITRE).一项比较微创血糖监测设备与传统监测方法在胰岛素治疗糖尿病管理中的随机对照试验(MITRE)。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 May;13(28):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta13280.
8
Patterns of diabetes care in Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, Bulgaria and Romania : An observational, non-interventional, cross-sectional study.斯洛文尼亚、克罗地亚、塞尔维亚、保加利亚和罗马尼亚的糖尿病护理模式:一项观察性、非干预性横断面研究。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017 Mar;129(5-6):192-200. doi: 10.1007/s00508-016-1143-1. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
9
Improving type 2 diabetes mellitus glycaemic outcomes is possible without spending more on medication: Lessons from the UK National Diabetes Audit.改善 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制结果无需在药物治疗上花费更多:来自英国国家糖尿病审计的经验教训。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jan;20(1):185-194. doi: 10.1111/dom.13067. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
10
Relationship between glycemic control and diabetes-related hospital costs in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.1型或2型糖尿病患者血糖控制与糖尿病相关住院费用之间的关系。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 May;16(4):264-75. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.4.264.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences with tailoring of primary diabetes care in well-organised general practices: a mixed-methods study.在组织良好的常规实践中进行初级糖尿病护理的调整经验:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 9;21(1):1218. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07198-2.
2
Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Assessment and Screening for Diabetes-Related Complications in Individuals With Diabetes: A Systematic Review.性别差异在心血管风险因素评估和糖尿病相关并发症筛查中的作用:系统评价。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 30;12:617902. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.617902. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
6. Glycemic Targets: .6. 血糖目标: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S55-S64. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S006.
2
Variations in achievement of evidence-based, high-impact quality indicators in general practice: An observational study.一般实践中基于证据的高影响力质量指标达成情况的差异:一项观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 13;12(7):e0177949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177949. eCollection 2017.
3
Outcomes and inequalities in diabetes from 2004/2005 to 2011/2012: English longitudinal study.2004/2005年至2011/2012年糖尿病的结局与不平等:英国纵向研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jan;67(654):e1-e9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X688381. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
4
HbA1c overtesting and overtreatment among US adults with controlled type 2 diabetes, 2001-13: observational population based study.2001 - 2013年美国2型糖尿病得到控制的成年人中糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测过度与治疗过度:基于人群的观察性研究
BMJ. 2015 Dec 8;351:h6138. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6138.
5
Reduced testing frequency for glycated hemoglobin, HbA1c, is associated with deteriorating diabetes control.糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测频率降低与糖尿病控制恶化相关。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Oct;37(10):2731-7. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0297.
6
Changes in HbA1c and frequency of measuring HbA1c and adjusting glucose-lowering medications in the 10 years following diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: a population-based study in the UK.HbA1c 变化及确诊 2 型糖尿病后 10 年内 HbA1c 测量频率和降糖药物调整情况:英国一项基于人群的研究。
Diabetologia. 2014 Aug;57(8):1586-94. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3250-8. Epub 2014 May 9.
7
Changes in HbA1c level over a 12-week follow-up in patients with type 2 diabetes following a medication change.2型糖尿病患者在药物变更后12周随访期间糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平的变化。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 25;9(3):e92458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092458. eCollection 2014.
8
The tougher the better: an economic analysis of increased payment thresholds on the performance of general practices.越严格越好:关于提高支付门槛对全科医疗绩效影响的经济分析
Health Econ. 2015 Mar;24(3):353-71. doi: 10.1002/hec.3022. Epub 2014 Jan 5.
9
Evidence-informed guidelines for treating frail older adults with type 2 diabetes: from the Diabetes Care Program of Nova Scotia (DCPNS) and the Palliative and Therapeutic Harmonization (PATH) program.基于证据的 2 型糖尿病衰弱老年人治疗指南:来自新斯科舍省糖尿病护理计划(DCPNS)和姑息治疗与治疗协调(PATH)计划。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Nov;14(11):801-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
10
Multimorbidity in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者队列中的共病现象。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2013 Mar;19(1):17-22. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2012.714768.