• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者的急救轴心:干预的最佳目标在哪里?

Urgent care axis for the older adult: where is best to target interventions?

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2019 Jan;36(1):22-26. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207505. Epub 2018 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2018-207505
PMID:30177504
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We explored the urgent care axis across EDs in Yorkshire and Humber (Y&H) for patients aged ≥75 years to identify where interventions could be targeted to prevent ED attendances and inpatient admissions.

METHODS

Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data for attendances across 18 EDs in Y&H from April 2011 to March 2014 were retrospectively analysed. HES A&E and Admitted Patient Care patient records data were linked to describe the entire patient pathway. The population studied was adult patients attending type 1 EDs, comparing those ≥75 years with those under 75. Data analysed included arrival mode, presentation time, time in ED, outcome (admitted/discharged), admission length of stay, International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) and cause codes related to admission. Short-stay admissions and admissions with potentially avoidable conditions (identified by ICD-10 codes and cause codes) were identified. Comparative analysis was undertaken between sites.

RESULTS

There were 3 736 541 ED attendances, of which 625 772 (16.7%) were ≥75 years. Older patients were significantly more likely to attend via ambulance than the younger cohort (OR 7.7, 95% CI 7.6 to 7.7), and had significantly longer median stays within ED (195 vs 136 min, p<0.001) and increased likelihood of admission (OR 4.5, 95% CI 4.5 to 4.6). Short-stay admissions accounted for 28.3% of older adult admissions. 37.3% of older adult admissions were with conditions that were potentially avoidable, accounting for 42.3% of short-stay admissions. There was regional variation in the proportions of older adults admitted (between 34.3% and 40.9%).

DISCUSSION

Large numbers of older adults present to EDs mainly by ambulance. Significant proportions are admitted for short periods with conditions that might potentially be managed outside of hospital. Variation across the region warrants further study.

摘要

背景

我们探索了约克郡和亨伯(Y&H)的急症护理轴,以确定 75 岁及以上患者可以在何处进行干预,以防止急诊就诊和住院。

方法

回顾性分析了 2011 年 4 月至 2014 年 3 月期间 Y&H 18 家急症室的医院入院统计数据(HES)。将 HES A&E 和入院患者护理患者记录数据进行链接,以描述整个患者路径。研究人群为成年患者,比较了 75 岁及以上患者和 75 岁以下患者。分析的数据包括到达模式、就诊时间、在 ED 中的时间、结果(住院/出院)、住院时间、国际疾病分类第 10 次修订版(ICD-10)和与入院相关的病因代码。确定了短期入院和潜在可避免的疾病入院(通过 ICD-10 代码和病因代码识别)。对站点之间进行了比较分析。

结果

共有 3736541 例 ED 就诊,其中 625772 例(16.7%)年龄≥75 岁。与年轻队列相比,老年患者更有可能通过救护车就诊(OR 7.7,95%CI 7.6 至 7.7),并且在 ED 内的中位停留时间明显更长(195 分钟比 136 分钟,p<0.001),并且入院的可能性增加(OR 4.5,95%CI 4.5 至 4.6)。短期入院占老年成人入院的 28.3%。老年成人入院中有 37.3%的情况可能是可以避免的,占短期入院的 42.3%。老年人入院比例存在区域差异(34.3%至 40.9%)。

讨论

大量老年人主要通过救护车到 ED 就诊。相当一部分人因短期住院,其病情可能在医院外得到更好的治疗。整个地区的差异需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Urgent care axis for the older adult: where is best to target interventions?老年患者的急救轴心:干预的最佳目标在哪里?
Emerg Med J. 2019 Jan;36(1):22-26. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207505. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
2
Factors associated with longer wait times, admission and reattendances in older patients attending emergency departments: an analysis of linked healthcare data.与老年患者在急诊就诊时等待时间延长、入院和再次就诊相关的因素:对医疗保健相关数据的分析。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Apr;40(4):248-256. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212303. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
3
Exploring the characteristics, acuity and management of adult ED patients at night-time.探讨夜间成人 ED 患者的特征、 acuity 和管理。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Sep;36(9):554-557. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208248. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
4
Characterising non-urgent users of the emergency department (ED): A retrospective analysis of routine ED data.急诊科非紧急情况就诊患者的特征分析:对急诊科常规数据的回顾性分析
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0192855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192855. eCollection 2018.
5
Who is less likely to die in association with improved National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) compliance for emergency admissions in a tertiary referral hospital?在一家三级转诊医院中,哪些人因改善国家紧急入院准入目标(NEAT)合规性而死亡的可能性较低?
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Apr;40(2):149-154. doi: 10.1071/AH14242.
6
Short-stay admissions at an inner city hospital: a cross-sectional analysis.城市内医院的短期住院治疗:一项横断面分析。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Apr;35(4):238-246. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205803. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
7
Presentation patterns and outcomes of patients with cancer accessing care in emergency departments in Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州癌症患者在急诊科就诊的模式及治疗结果。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Mar;24(3):1251-60. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2921-4. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
8
Emergency Department Length of Stay for Critical Care Admissions. A Population-based Study.重症监护病房收治患者的急诊科住院时间。一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Aug;13(8):1324-32. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-773OC.
9
Trends in short-stay hospitalizations for older adults from 1990 to 2010: implications for geriatric emergency care.1990 年至 2010 年老年人短期住院治疗趋势:对老年急救护理的启示。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;32(4):311-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.12.011. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
10
Frequent use of emergency departments by older people: a comparative cohort study of characteristics and outcomes.老年人频繁使用急诊科:一项关于特征和结局的比较队列研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Oct 1;30(8):624-629. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy062.

引用本文的文献

1
What Is Important to Older People When Accessing Urgent Health Care: Key Considerations and Recommendations From Consumer Consultations.老年人获得紧急医疗保健时的重要事项:消费者咨询的关键考虑因素和建议
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70311. doi: 10.1111/hex.70311.
2
Liver protects neuron viability and electrocortical activity in post-cardiac arrest brain injury.肝脏在心脏骤停后脑损伤中保护神经元活力和皮质电活动。
EMBO Mol Med. 2024 Oct;16(10):2322-2348. doi: 10.1038/s44321-024-00140-z. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
3
Evaluating a new emergency department avoidance service for older people: patient and relative experiences.
评估新的老年人急诊回避服务:患者和家属的体验。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Sep;40(9):641-645. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212949. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
4
A matter of participation? A critical incident study of municipal care personnel in situations involving care-dependent older persons and emergency medical services.参与问题?一项关于市级护理人员在涉及依赖护理的老年人和紧急医疗服务情况下的关键事件研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2022 Dec;17(1):2082062. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2022.2082062.
5
Implementing a multidisciplinary rapid geriatric observation unit for non-critical older patients referred to hospital: observational study on real-world data.实施多学科快速老年观察单元,用于收治非危急老年患者:基于真实世界数据的观察性研究。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 Mar;34(3):599-609. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01967-z. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
6
Characteristic patterns of emergency ambulance assignments for older adults compared with adults requiring emergency care at home in Sweden: a total population study.瑞典老年人与需要在家接受紧急护理的成年人相比,紧急救护车分配的特征模式:一项全人群研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Dec 2;20(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00387-y.
7
Healthcare pathways and resource use: mapping consequences of ambulance assessment for direct care with alternative healthcare providers.医疗保健路径和资源利用:绘制救护车评估对直接护理的替代医疗保健提供者的后果图。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 30;20(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00380-5.