• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨夜间成人 ED 患者的特征、 acuity 和管理。

Exploring the characteristics, acuity and management of adult ED patients at night-time.

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2019 Sep;36(9):554-557. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208248. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2018-208248
PMID:31362935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6818519/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

ED care is required for acutely unwell and injured patients 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The aim of this study was to compare characteristics and activity of type 1 ED attendances according to whether their time of arrival was during the day (08:00-18:00) or at night (18:00-08:00).

METHODS

Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data from NHS Digital for all A&E and admitted patient care activity provided by all acute (not mental health or primary care) NHS hospital trusts in Yorkshire and Humber (1 April 2011 to 31 March 2014) for adult patients were analysed. Adjusted linear and logistic regression was used to model the data.

RESULTS

Adjusted regression analysis results show that patients who attended ED at night waited an extra 18.76 (95% CI 18.62 to 18.89) min to be seen by a clinician. They also spent an additional 13.64 (95% CI 13.47 to 13.81) min total in ED. Patients who attended at night were OR 2.20 (95% CI 2.17 to 2.23) times more likely to leave without being seen. They were also OR 1.26 (95% CI 1.25 to 1.27) times more likely to re-attend the ED and were OR 1.20 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.21) times more likely to present with non-urgent conditions. Overnight patients were more likely to be admitted to hospital, OR 1.09 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.10) times, however, those admitted were more likely to have a short-stay admission.

CONCLUSION

There is an 'overnight effect' of patients attending EDs. Patients wait longer, leave without being seen, attend with non-urgent problems and are more likely to be admitted for a short stay. Further work is required to identify the potential underlying causes of these differences.

摘要

目的

急诊需要 24 小时、每周 7 天为病情严重和受伤的患者提供服务。本研究的目的是比较根据到达时间(白天 08:00-18:00 或夜间 18:00-08:00),1 型 ED 就诊的特征和活动。

方法

使用 NHS Digital 的医院入院统计(HES)数据,对约克郡和亨伯(2011 年 4 月 1 日至 2014 年 3 月 31 日)所有急性(非心理健康或初级保健)NHS 医院信托机构提供的所有急症和住院患者护理活动进行分析。使用调整后的线性和逻辑回归对数据进行建模。

结果

调整后的回归分析结果显示,夜间到急诊就诊的患者等待医生接诊的时间额外增加了 18.76 分钟(95%CI 18.62-18.89)。他们在急诊室的总停留时间也增加了 13.64 分钟(95%CI 13.47-13.81)。夜间就诊的患者未得到诊治而离开的可能性增加了 2.20 倍(95%CI 2.17-2.23)。他们再次就诊的可能性增加了 1.26 倍(95%CI 1.25-1.27),且他们出现非紧急情况的可能性增加了 1.20 倍(95%CI 1.19-1.21)。夜间就诊的患者更有可能被收治入院,OR 为 1.09(95%CI 1.09-1.10),但入院的患者更有可能是短期住院。

结论

患者在急诊就诊存在“夜间效应”。患者等待时间更长,未得到诊治就离开,出现非紧急问题,更有可能因短期住院而入院。需要进一步研究以确定这些差异的潜在根本原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb3/6818519/73833359fffe/emermed-2018-208248f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb3/6818519/73833359fffe/emermed-2018-208248f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb3/6818519/73833359fffe/emermed-2018-208248f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the characteristics, acuity and management of adult ED patients at night-time.探讨夜间成人 ED 患者的特征、 acuity 和管理。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Sep;36(9):554-557. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208248. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
Urgent care axis for the older adult: where is best to target interventions?老年患者的急救轴心:干预的最佳目标在哪里?
Emerg Med J. 2019 Jan;36(1):22-26. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207505. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
3
Factors associated with longer wait times, admission and reattendances in older patients attending emergency departments: an analysis of linked healthcare data.与老年患者在急诊就诊时等待时间延长、入院和再次就诊相关的因素:对医疗保健相关数据的分析。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Apr;40(4):248-256. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212303. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
4
Emergency Department Length of Stay for Critical Care Admissions. A Population-based Study.重症监护病房收治患者的急诊科住院时间。一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Aug;13(8):1324-32. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-773OC.
5
Characterising non-urgent users of the emergency department (ED): A retrospective analysis of routine ED data.急诊科非紧急情况就诊患者的特征分析:对急诊科常规数据的回顾性分析
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0192855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192855. eCollection 2018.
6
Critical care by emergency physicians in American and English hospitals.美国和英国医院中急诊医生提供的重症监护。
Arch Emerg Med. 1993 Sep;10(3):145-54. doi: 10.1136/emj.10.3.145.
7
Emergency department boarding: a descriptive analysis and measurement of impact on outcomes.急诊科滞留:一项关于其影响结果的描述性分析与评估
CJEM. 2018 Nov;20(6):929-937. doi: 10.1017/cem.2018.18. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
8
The effect of hospital occupancy on emergency department length of stay and patient disposition.医院床位占用情况对急诊科住院时间和患者处置的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Feb;10(2):127-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00029.x.
9
Emergency department resource use by supervised residents vs attending physicians alone.监管住院医师与单独主治医生相比在急诊科的资源使用情况。
JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2394-400. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16172.
10
Association between delays to patient admission from the emergency department and all-cause 30-day mortality.从急诊科入院到患者死亡的时间延迟与全因 30 天死亡率之间的关联。
Emerg Med J. 2022 Mar;39(3):168-173. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2021-211572. Epub 2022 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Open-label placebo for non-specific pain in the emergency department (OLP EM): study protocol for a mixed-method randomised control feasibility study in Switzerland.急诊科非特异性疼痛的开放标签安慰剂研究(OLP EM):瑞士一项混合方法随机对照可行性研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 25;15(3):e090508. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090508.
2
Variation in Emergency Department Physician Admitting Practices and Subsequent Mortality.急诊科医生收治方式的差异与后续死亡率
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Feb 1;185(2):153-160. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6925.
3
Rethinking non-urgent EMS conveyance to ED during night-time - a pilot study in Southwest Finland.

本文引用的文献

1
Sicker patients account for the weekend mortality effect among adult emergency admissions to a large hospital trust.病情较重的患者导致了一家大型医院信托机构成年急诊入院患者的周末死亡率效应。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Mar;28(3):223-230. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008219. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
2
Characterising non-urgent users of the emergency department (ED): A retrospective analysis of routine ED data.急诊科非紧急情况就诊患者的特征分析:对急诊科常规数据的回顾性分析
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0192855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192855. eCollection 2018.
3
Who breaches the four-hour emergency department wait time target? A retrospective analysis of 374,000 emergency department attendances between 2008 and 2013 at a type 1 emergency department in England.
重新思考夜间非紧急 EMS 向 ED 的转运 - 芬兰西南部的一项试点研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00872-0.
4
Using machine-learning risk prediction models to triage the acuity of undifferentiated patients entering the emergency care system: a systematic review.使用机器学习风险预测模型对进入急诊护理系统的未分化患者的 acuity 进行分诊:一项系统综述。 (注:这里“acuity”在医学语境中可能有“ acuity of illness 病情严重程度”等含义,具体需结合上下文准确理解,但按照要求不添加解释。)
Diagn Progn Res. 2020 Oct 2;4:16. doi: 10.1186/s41512-020-00084-1. eCollection 2020.
谁未达到急诊科四小时等待时间目标?对2008年至2013年间英格兰一家一级急诊科的37.4万例急诊科就诊病例进行的回顾性分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 2;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12873-017-0145-2.
4
Data linkage studies can help to explain the weekend effect.数据关联研究有助于解释周末效应。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 1;390(10089):8-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31195-9. Epub 2017 May 9.
5
Arrival by ambulance explains variation in mortality by time of admission: retrospective study of admissions to hospital following emergency department attendance in England.救护车到达时间解释了入院时间死亡率的差异:英国急诊科就诊后住院的回顾性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):613-621. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005680. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
6
The ubiquitous weekend effect: moving past proving it exists to clarifying what causes it.普遍存在的周末效应:从证明其存在转向阐明其成因。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Aug;24(8):480-2. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004360. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
7
Why parents use the emergency department during evening hours for nonemergent pediatric care.为何家长在夜间因非紧急儿科护理而前往急诊科。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2014 Oct;53(11):1055-61. doi: 10.1177/0009922814540988. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
8
Access to general practice and visits to accident and emergency departments in England: cross-sectional analysis of a national patient survey.英格兰地区的全科医疗服务利用情况及急诊就诊情况:一项全国性患者调查的横断面分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Jul;64(624):e434-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X680533.
9
Patients' and carers' experiences of gaining access to acute stroke care: a qualitative study.患者及护理人员获得急性中风护理的经历:一项定性研究。
Emerg Med J. 2013 Dec;30(12):1033-7. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201974. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
10
Can after-hours family medicine clinics represent an alternative to emergency departments? Survey of ambulatory patients seeking after-hours care.家庭医生夜间诊所能否替代急诊科?对寻求夜间就诊的门诊患者的调查。
Can Fam Physician. 2009 Nov;55(11):1106-1107.e4.