Ihme Klas, Unni Anirudh, Zhang Meng, Rieger Jochem W, Jipp Meike
Department of Human Factors, Institute of Transportation Systems, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Braunschweig, Germany.
Department of Psychology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Aug 17;12:327. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00327. eCollection 2018.
Experiencing frustration while driving can harm cognitive processing, result in aggressive behavior and hence negatively influence driving performance and traffic safety. Being able to automatically detect frustration would allow adaptive driver assistance and automation systems to adequately react to a driver's frustration and mitigate potential negative consequences. To identify reliable and valid indicators of driver's frustration, we conducted two driving simulator experiments. In the first experiment, we aimed to reveal facial expressions that indicate frustration in continuous video recordings of the driver's face taken while driving highly realistic simulator scenarios in which frustrated or non-frustrated emotional states were experienced. An automated analysis of facial expressions combined with multivariate logistic regression classification revealed that frustrated time intervals can be discriminated from non-frustrated ones with accuracy of 62.0% (mean over 30 participants). A further analysis of the facial expressions revealed that frustrated drivers tend to activate muscles in the mouth region (chin raiser, lip pucker, lip pressor). In the second experiment, we measured cortical activation with almost whole-head functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) while participants experienced frustrating and non-frustrating driving simulator scenarios. Multivariate logistic regression applied to the fNIRS measurements allowed us to discriminate between frustrated and non-frustrated driving intervals with higher accuracy of 78.1% (mean over 12 participants). Frustrated driving intervals were indicated by increased activation in the inferior frontal, putative premotor and occipito-temporal cortices. Our results show that facial and cortical markers of frustration can be informative for time resolved driver state identification in complex realistic driving situations. The markers derived here can potentially be used as an input for future adaptive driver assistance and automation systems that detect driver frustration and adaptively react to mitigate it.
驾驶时感到沮丧会损害认知处理能力,导致攻击性行为,从而对驾驶表现和交通安全产生负面影响。能够自动检测到沮丧情绪将使自适应驾驶辅助和自动化系统能够对驾驶员的沮丧情绪做出充分反应,并减轻潜在的负面后果。为了确定驾驶员沮丧情绪的可靠有效指标,我们进行了两项驾驶模拟器实验。在第一个实验中,我们旨在揭示在驾驶高度逼真的模拟器场景时拍摄的驾驶员面部连续视频记录中表明沮丧情绪的面部表情,在这些场景中驾驶员会经历沮丧或非沮丧的情绪状态。对面部表情进行自动分析并结合多元逻辑回归分类发现,沮丧的时间间隔与非沮丧的时间间隔能够以62.0%的准确率区分开来(30名参与者的平均值)。对面部表情的进一步分析表明,沮丧的驾驶员往往会激活口腔区域的肌肉(下巴上扬肌、嘴唇噘起肌、嘴唇按压肌)。在第二个实验中,当参与者经历沮丧和非沮丧的驾驶模拟器场景时,我们使用几乎全头功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)测量皮层激活情况。将多元逻辑回归应用于fNIRS测量结果,使我们能够以更高的78.1%的准确率区分沮丧和非沮丧的驾驶时间段(12名参与者的平均值)。沮丧的驾驶时间段表现为额下回、假定的运动前区和枕颞叶皮层的激活增加。我们的结果表明,沮丧情绪的面部和皮层标记对于在复杂逼真的驾驶情境中进行时间分辨的驾驶员状态识别具有参考价值。这里得出的标记有可能用作未来自适应驾驶辅助和自动化系统的输入,这些系统能够检测驾驶员的沮丧情绪并做出适应性反应以减轻这种情绪。