Suppr超能文献

了解驾驶场景中的挫折触发因素和情绪反应。

Understanding frustration triggers and emotional responses in driving situations.

作者信息

Yazdi Hannaneh, Wickman Casper, Ljung Aust Mikael, Selbing Ida, Kowalski Leo, Axelsson John

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Volvo Cars, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 19;14(1):28613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76792-1.

Abstract

Frustration is a complex emotional phenomenon subject to various triggers and manifested through multifaceted behavioral and affective responses. This study investigates the relationship between distinct frustration-inducing situations encountered during driving and the corresponding affective responses, focusing on the mediating role of behavioral dimensions. A total of 2244 participants answered a questionnaire on driving behavior, the likelihood of experiencing frustration in various driving situations, and affective responses in frustrating situations. Latent factors and triggers of frustration were determined using Exploratory Factor Analysis, and their relationship to driving behavior was assessed using Multiple Regression Analysis. We identified four primary clusters of situations that could trigger frustration in drivers: Unpredictable Experiences, Achievement Obstacles, Distress Elicitors and External Distractions. The emotions accompanying driver frustration clustered into four distinct dimensions: Irritation, Anxiety, Boredom, and Embarrassment. While anxiety-related emotions were central in all frustrating responses (i.e., all four clusters), the other emotion dimensions were specifically related to some of the frustration clusters. Additionally, different types of frustrating situations were characterized by different emotional responses. Furthermore, having more lapses was related to heightened frustration levels. Unraveling the complexities of frustration may aid in the further further development of traffic safety by attempting to eliminate frequent frustration triggers in driving situations.

摘要

挫折是一种复杂的情绪现象,会受到各种触发因素的影响,并通过多方面的行为和情感反应表现出来。本研究调查了驾驶过程中遇到的不同挫折诱发情境与相应情感反应之间的关系,重点关注行为维度的中介作用。共有2244名参与者回答了一份关于驾驶行为、在各种驾驶情境中经历挫折的可能性以及在挫折情境中的情感反应的问卷。使用探索性因素分析确定挫折的潜在因素和触发因素,并使用多元回归分析评估它们与驾驶行为的关系。我们确定了可能引发驾驶员挫折感的四种主要情境类别:不可预测的经历、成就障碍、困扰引发因素和外部干扰。伴随驾驶员挫折感的情绪分为四个不同维度:愤怒、焦虑、无聊和尴尬。虽然与焦虑相关的情绪在所有挫折反应(即所有四个类别)中都很核心,但其他情绪维度与某些挫折类别具体相关。此外,不同类型的挫折情境具有不同的情绪反应特征。此外,失误较多与更高的挫折水平相关。通过试图消除驾驶情境中频繁出现的挫折触发因素来解开挫折的复杂性,可能有助于交通安全的进一步发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e7d/11576952/3be0be80a9f2/41598_2024_76792_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding frustration triggers and emotional responses in driving situations.
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 19;14(1):28613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76792-1.
2
Hurried driving: Relationship to distress tolerance, driver anger, aggressive and risky driving in college students.
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Mar;51:51-5. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
3
Emotional states of drivers and the impact on speed, acceleration and traffic violations - a simulator study.
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Sep;70:282-92. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 May 15.
4
Difficulties in emotion regulation and risky driving among Lithuanian drivers.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Oct 3;18(7):688-693. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1315109. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
6
The antecedents, experience, and coping strategies of driver boredom in young adult males.
J Safety Res. 2016 Dec;59:69-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
7
The influence of bus and taxi drivers' public self-consciousness and social anxiety on aberrant driving behaviors.
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Aug;117:145-153. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
9
An experimental study of factors associated with driver frustration and overtaking intentions.
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jun;79:221-30. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.032. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
10
Do aggressive driving and negative emotional driving mediate the link between impulsiveness and risky driving among young Italian drivers?
J Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov-Dec;156(6):669-673. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2016.1165169. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Who gets frustrated? Identifying individuals prone to frustration using a latent profile analysis.
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 21;16:1483965. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1483965. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Issues and recommendations for exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 May;17(5):1004-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.027. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
3
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
4
Emotion and decision making.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:799-823. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
5
Age, gender, mileage and the DBQ: the validity of the Driver Behavior Questionnaire in different driver groups.
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Mar;52:228-36. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.036. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
6
Self-harm and suicide in adolescents.
Lancet. 2012 Jun 23;379(9834):2373-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60322-5.
7
The Driver Behaviour Questionnaire as a predictor of accidents: a meta-analysis.
J Safety Res. 2010 Dec;41(6):463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.10.007. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
8
Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction?
Ergonomics. 1990 Oct-Nov;33(10-11):1315-32. doi: 10.1080/00140139008925335.
9
Relationships among organizational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2006 Jan;11(1):100-18. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.100.
10
The impact of reward, punishment, and frustration on attention in pediatric bipolar disorder.
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Oct 1;58(7):532-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.01.006. Epub 2005 Jun 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验