Sasaki Ryoki, Tsuiki Shota, Miyaguchi Shota, Kojima Sho, Saito Kei, Inukai Yasuto, Otsuru Naofumi, Onishi Hideaki
Institute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Aug 20;12:332. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00332. eCollection 2018.
Somatosensory inputs induced by repetitive passive movement (RPM) modulate primary motor cortex (M1) excitability; however, it is unclear whether RPM affects primary somatosensory cortex (S1) excitability. In this study, we investigated whether RPM affects somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and resting state brain oscillation, including alpha and beta bands, depend on RPM frequency. Nineteen healthy subjects participated in this study, and SEPs elicited by peripheral nerve electrical stimulation were recorded from the C3' area in order to assess S1 excitability (Exp. 1: = 15). We focused on prominent SEP components such as N20, P25 and P45-reflecting S1 activities. In addition, resting electroencephalograms (EEGs) were recorded from C3' area to assess the internal state of the brain network at rest (Exp. 2: = 15). Passive abduction/adduction of the right index finger was applied for 10 min at frequencies of 0.5, 1.0, 3.0, and 5.0 Hz in Exp. 1, and 1.0, 3.0, and 5.0 Hz in Exp. 2. No changes in N20 or P25 components were observed following RPM. The 3.0 Hz-RPM decreased the P45 component for 20 min ( < 0.05), but otherwise did not affect the P45 component. There was no difference in the alpha and beta bands before and after any RPM; however, a negative correlation was observed between the rate of change of beta power and P45 component at 3.0 Hz-RPM. Our findings indicated that the P45 component changes depending on the RPM frequency, suggesting that somatosensory inputs induced by RPM influences S1 excitability. Additionally, beta power enhancement appears to contribute to the P45 component depression in 3.0 Hz-RPM.
重复被动运动(RPM)诱发的体感输入可调节初级运动皮层(M1)的兴奋性;然而,RPM是否影响初级体感皮层(S1)的兴奋性尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们调查了RPM是否影响体感诱发电位(SEP)和静息状态脑振荡,包括α和β频段,这取决于RPM频率。19名健康受试者参与了本研究,通过记录C3'区域由外周神经电刺激诱发的SEP来评估S1兴奋性(实验1:n = 15)。我们关注反映S1活动的突出SEP成分,如N20、P25和P45。此外,记录C3'区域的静息脑电图(EEG)以评估静息时脑网络的内部状态(实验2:n = 15)。在实验1中,以0.5、1.0、3.0和5.0 Hz的频率对右手食指进行被动外展/内收10分钟,在实验2中为1.0、3.0和5.0 Hz。RPM后未观察到N20或P25成分的变化。3.0 Hz的RPM使P45成分在20分钟内降低(P < 0.05),但在其他方面未影响P45成分。任何RPM前后α和β频段均无差异;然而,在3.0 Hz的RPM下,β功率变化率与P45成分之间存在负相关。我们的研究结果表明,P45成分随RPM频率而变化,表明RPM诱发的体感输入会影响S1兴奋性。此外,β功率增强似乎导致了3.0 Hz的RPM中P45成分的降低。