Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;4(12):1707-1712. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3277.
Gemcitabine with platinum has limited efficacy for treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma, necessitating an evaluation of alternative drug combinations. Recent evidence suggests that paclitaxel may potentiate gemcitabine activity.
To evaluate whether gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel is safe and effective for treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-arm, 2-stage, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted at 23 community and academic centers across the United States and Europe. Patients aged 18 years or older enrolled between September 2014 and March 2016 had confirmed advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma without prior systemic therapy, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 0 to 1 and a Child-Pugh score less than 8. Previous surgery, radiation, or liver-directed therapies were permitted.
Patients received intravenous nab-paclitaxel, 125 mg/m2, followed by gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects.
The primary outcome was improvement in 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (null and alternative hypotheses of 55% and 70%, respectively) in the evaluable population. Secondary outcomes included median overall survival (OS), PFS, time to progression, best overall response rate, disease control rate, safety and toxicity, and association of change in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 with survival.
Seventy-four patients with a median age of 62 (range, 36-87) years, including 44 women (60%), were enrolled. Patients received a median of 6 (range, 1-18) treatment cycles, and the median follow-up was 10.2 (range, 0.6-27.3) months. The observed 6-month PFS rate of 61% (95% CI, 48%-73%) did not favor the alternative hypothesis. Median PFS was 7.7 (95% CI, 5.4-13.1) months, median OS was 12.4 (95% CI, 9.2-15.9) months, and median time to progression was 7.7 (95% CI, 6.1-13.1) months. The confirmed best overall response rate and disease control rate were 30% and 66%, respectively. Hazard ratios for an association between a change in serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and median PFS as well as median OS were 2.02 (95% CI, 0.86-4.75) (P = .10) and 1.54 (95% CI, 0.64-3.71) (P = .34), respectively. The most common treatment-related hematologic and nonhematologic adverse events at grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (43%) and fatigue (14%), respectively.
Although the trial did not meet its primary efficacy end point, the results indicate that a nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine regimen was well tolerated and may be an alternative option to current therapeutic approaches for advanced cholangiocarcinoma.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02181634.
吉西他滨联合铂类药物对晚期胆管癌的治疗效果有限,因此需要评估替代药物组合。最近的证据表明,紫杉醇可能增强吉西他滨的活性。
评估吉西他滨联合纳米白蛋白结合紫杉醇(nab-紫杉醇)治疗晚期胆管癌的安全性和有效性。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在美国和欧洲的 23 个社区和学术中心进行的单臂、2 期、2 期临床试验。2014 年 9 月至 2016 年 3 月期间,年龄在 18 岁或以上、未经系统治疗的确诊晚期或转移性胆管癌患者,东部合作肿瘤组(ECOG)体能状态评分为 0 至 1 分,Child-Pugh 评分<8 分。既往手术、放疗或肝定向治疗允许。
患者在每个 28 天治疗周期的第 1、8 和 15 天接受静脉注射 nab-紫杉醇,剂量为 125mg/m2,然后给予吉西他滨,剂量为 1000mg/m2,直至疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性作用。
主要终点是可评估人群中 6 个月无进展生存率(PFS)(零假设和替代假设分别为 55%和 70%)的改善。次要终点包括中位总生存期(OS)、PFS、进展时间、最佳总缓解率、疾病控制率、安全性和毒性以及碳水化合物抗原 19-9 变化与生存的关系。
74 名中位年龄为 62 岁(范围,36-87 岁)的患者,包括 44 名女性(60%),入组。患者接受了中位数为 6 个(范围,1-18 个)治疗周期,中位随访时间为 10.2 个月(范围,0.6-27.3 个月)。观察到的 6 个月 PFS 率为 61%(95%CI,48%-73%),不符合替代假设。中位 PFS 为 7.7 个月(95%CI,5.4-13.1),中位 OS 为 12.4 个月(95%CI,9.2-15.9),中位进展时间为 7.7 个月(95%CI,6.1-13.1)。确认的最佳总缓解率和疾病控制率分别为 30%和 66%。血清碳水化合物抗原 19-9 变化与中位 PFS 和中位 OS 之间关联的风险比分别为 2.02(95%CI,0.86-4.75)(P=0.10)和 1.54(95%CI,0.64-3.71)(P=0.34)。最常见的 3 级或以上治疗相关血液学和非血液学不良事件分别为中性粒细胞减少症(43%)和疲劳(14%)。
尽管该试验未达到主要疗效终点,但结果表明,nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨方案耐受性良好,可能是晚期胆管癌现有治疗方法的替代选择。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02181634。