Higuchi M
Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi. 1986 May;61(3):437-47.
Neutralization test and DNA restriction endonuclease analysis were performed in strains of adenovirus types 19 (Ad-19) and 37 (Ad-37) isolated from patients with acute conjunctivitis in Sapporo, Kao-Hsiung (Taiwan) and Pusan (Korea) in the period of 1979 and 1984. Although Ad-19 and Ad-37 were differentiated, they were related to each other in neutralization test. There was no difference between prototype strain and isolates in Ad-19 and Ad-37 strains. By DNA restriction endonuclease analysis Ad-19 isolates were clearly distinct from Ad-19 prototype strain (AV-587) and Ad-37 strains. And it was suggested that these Ad-19 isolates from East Asia were as same as isolates from Europe named Ad-19a. Ad-37 isolated strains were as same as Ad-37 prototype strain (GW) by SmaI, SacI, SalI, BamHI, EcoRI, XhoI, HindIII restriction analysis. But some strains were distinct from prototype strain by only HindIII restriction analysis, and they were new subtype of Ad-37 which had never been reported.
1979年至1984年期间,对从札幌、高雄(台湾)和釜山(韩国)急性结膜炎患者中分离出的19型(Ad-19)和37型(Ad-37)腺病毒株进行了中和试验和DNA限制性内切酶分析。虽然Ad-19和Ad-37可以区分,但它们在中和试验中彼此相关。Ad-19和Ad-37株的原型株与分离株之间没有差异。通过DNA限制性内切酶分析,Ad-19分离株与Ad-19原型株(AV-587)和Ad-37株明显不同。并且表明这些来自东亚的Ad-19分离株与来自欧洲的名为Ad-19a的分离株相同。通过SmaI、SacI、SalI、BamHI、EcoRI、XhoI、HindIII限制性分析,Ad-37分离株与Ad-37原型株(GW)相同。但有些菌株仅通过HindIII限制性分析与原型株不同,它们是从未报道过的Ad-37新亚型。