Kirby Matthew E, Simperler Alexandra, Krevor Samuel, Weiss Dominik J, Sonnenberg Jason L
Earth Science and Engineering , Imperial College London , London SW7 2AZ , United Kingdom.
Chemistry Department , Imperial College London , London SW7 2AZ , United Kingdom.
J Phys Chem A. 2018 Oct 11;122(40):8007-8019. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b06863. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
Uranium (U) interacts with organic ligands, subsequently controlling its aqueous chemistry. It is therefore imperative to assess the binding ability of natural organic molecules. We evidence that density functional theory (DFT) can be used as a practical protocol for predicting the stability of U organic ligand complexes, allowing for the development of a relative stability series for organic complexes with limited experimental data. Solvation methods and DFT settings were benchmarked to suggest a suitable off-the-shelf solution. The results indicate that the IEFPCM solvation method should be employed. A mixed solvation approach improves the accuracy of the calculated stability constant (log β); however, the calculated log β are approximately five times more favorable than experimental data. Different basis sets, functionals, and effective core potentials were tested to check that there were no major changes in molecular geometries and Δ G. The recommended method employed is the B3LYP functional, aug-cc-pVDZ basis set for ligands, MDF60 ECP and basis set for U, and the IEFPCM solvation model. Using the fitting approach employed in the literature with these updated DFT settings allows fitting of 1:1 U complexes with root-mean-square deviation of 1.38 log β units. Fitting multiple bound carboxylate ligands indicates a second, separate fitting for 1:2 and 1:3 complexes.
铀(U)与有机配体相互作用,进而控制其水相化学性质。因此,评估天然有机分子的结合能力至关重要。我们证明密度泛函理论(DFT)可作为预测铀有机配体配合物稳定性的实用方法,从而在实验数据有限的情况下建立有机配合物的相对稳定性序列。对溶剂化方法和DFT设置进行了基准测试,以提出合适的现成解决方案。结果表明应采用IEFPCM溶剂化方法。混合溶剂化方法提高了计算得到的稳定常数(logβ)的准确性;然而,计算得到的logβ比实验数据大约有利五倍。测试了不同的基组、泛函和有效核势,以检查分子几何结构和ΔG是否有重大变化。推荐使用的方法是B3LYP泛函、配体的aug-cc-pVDZ基组、U的MDF60 ECP和基组以及IEFPCM溶剂化模型。使用文献中采用的拟合方法以及这些更新后的DFT设置,能够对1:1铀配合物进行拟合,均方根偏差为1.38 logβ单位。对多个结合的羧酸盐配体进行拟合表明,对于1:2和1:3配合物需要进行第二次单独拟合。