Suppr超能文献

金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染后的生存情况:一项评估治疗地点影响的前瞻性跨国队列研究。

Survival following Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: A prospective multinational cohort study assessing the impact of place of care.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton, BN2 5BE, United Kingdom.

Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Goldenfelsstr. 19, 50935 Cologne, Germany; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Bonn-Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

J Infect. 2018 Dec;77(6):516-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Sep 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB) is a common, life-threatening infection with a high mortality. Survival can be improved by implementing quality of care bundles in hospitals. We previously observed marked differences in mortality between hospitals and now assessed whether mortality could serve as a valid and easy to implement quality of care outcome measure.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study between January 2013 and April 2015 on consecutive, adult patients with SAB from 11 tertiary care centers in Germany, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom. Factors associated with mortality at 90 days were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression and flexible parametric models.

RESULTS

1851 patients with a median age of 66 years (64% male) were analyzed. Crude 90-day mortality differed significantly between hospitals (range 23-39%). Significant variation between centers was observed for methicillin-resistant S. aureus, community-acquisition, infective foci, as well as measures of comorbidities, and severity of disease. In multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with mortality at 90 days were age, nosocomial acquisition, unknown infective focus, pneumonia, Charlson comorbidity index, SOFA score, and study center. The risk of death varied over time differently for each infective focus. Crude mortality differed markedly from adjusted mortality.

DISCUSSION

We observed significant differences in adjusted mortality between hospitals, suggesting differences in quality of care. However, mortality is strongly influenced by patient mix and thus, crude mortality is not a suitable quality indicator.

摘要

背景

金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染(SAB)是一种常见的、危及生命的感染,死亡率很高。通过在医院实施护理质量包,可以提高生存率。我们之前观察到医院之间的死亡率存在显著差异,现在评估死亡率是否可以作为一种有效的、易于实施的护理质量结果衡量标准。

方法

我们在 2013 年 1 月至 2015 年 4 月期间,对来自德国、韩国、西班牙、中国台湾和英国的 11 家三级护理中心的连续成年 SAB 患者进行了前瞻性观察性研究。通过 Cox 比例风险回归和灵活参数模型分析与 90 天死亡率相关的因素。

结果

分析了 1851 例中位年龄为 66 岁(64%为男性)的患者。医院之间的 90 天粗死亡率差异显著(范围为 23%-39%)。各中心之间存在明显差异的因素包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、社区获得性、感染病灶以及合并症和疾病严重程度的衡量标准。多变量分析显示,90 天死亡率独立相关的因素包括年龄、医院获得性感染、未知感染病灶、肺炎、Charlson 合并症指数、SOFA 评分和研究中心。每种感染病灶的死亡风险随时间的变化不同。粗死亡率与调整后死亡率差异显著。

讨论

我们观察到医院之间调整后死亡率存在显著差异,这表明护理质量存在差异。然而,死亡率受患者人群的影响很大,因此,粗死亡率不是一个合适的质量指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验