Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, 1018 WT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 127, 1018 WS, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, WA 6009, Crawley, Australia.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;62:38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
In two experiments, we investigated the effects of Attentional Bias Modification (ABM) on emotion regulation, i.e. the manner in which people influence emotional experiences. We hypothesized that decreases in attentional bias to threat would impair upregulation and improve downregulation of negative emotions, while increases in attentional bias to threat would improve upregulation and impair downregulation of negative emotions.
Using the emotion-in-motion paradigm (Experiment 1, N = 60) and the visual search task (Experiment 2, N = 58), we trained participants to attend to either threatening or positive stimuli and we assessed emotion intensity while observing, upregulating, and downregulating emotions in response to grids of mixed emotional pictures.
In Experiment 1, the attend positive group reported more positive emotions while merely watching grids of training pictures and the attend threat group showed impaired upregulation of negative affect. In Experiment 2, the attend threat group reported intensified negative emotions for all three instructions, while the attend positive group remained largely stable over time.
We cannot unequivocally attribute these changes in emotion regulation to changes in attentional bias, as neither of the experiments yielded significant changes in attentional bias to threat.
By showing that attentional bias modification procedures affect the manner in which people deal with emotions, we add empirical weight to the conceptual overlap between attentional bias modification and emotion regulation.
在两项实验中,我们考察了注意偏向修正(ABM)对情绪调节的影响,即人们影响情绪体验的方式。我们假设,对威胁的注意偏向减少会损害负性情绪的上调和改善下调,而对威胁的注意偏向增加会改善负性情绪的上调和损害下调。
我们使用情绪运动范式(实验 1,N=60)和视觉搜索任务(实验 2,N=58),训练参与者关注威胁或积极的刺激,并在观察、上调和下调对混合情绪图片网格的情绪时评估情绪强度。
在实验 1 中,积极关注组在仅仅观察训练图片网格时报告了更多的积极情绪,而威胁关注组表现出负性情绪的上调受损。在实验 2 中,威胁关注组在所有三个指令下都报告了更强烈的负面情绪,而积极关注组在整个过程中基本保持稳定。
我们不能将这些情绪调节的变化明确归因于注意偏向的变化,因为这两个实验都没有导致对威胁的注意偏向发生显著变化。
通过表明注意偏向修正程序影响了人们处理情绪的方式,我们为注意偏向修正和情绪调节之间的概念重叠增加了实证依据。