Virus and Prion Research Unit, USDA-ARS, 1920 Dayton Avenue, P.O. Box 70, Ames, IA 50010, USA; Laboratório de Virologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul-UFRGS, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9090, CEP: 91540-000 Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Virus and Prion Research Unit, USDA-ARS, 1920 Dayton Avenue, P.O. Box 70, Ames, IA 50010, USA.
Vaccine. 2018 Oct 1;36(41):6103-6110. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.08.072. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
Influenza A virus (IAV) causes a disease burden in the swine industry in the US and is a challenge to prevent due to substantial genetic and antigenic diversity of IAV that circulate in pig populations. Whole inactivated virus (WIV) vaccines formulated with oil-in-water (OW) adjuvant are commonly used in swine. However, WIV-OW are associated with vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD) when the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase of the vaccine strain are mismatched with the challenge virus. Here, we assessed if different types of adjuvant in WIV vaccine formulations impacted VAERD outcome. WIV vaccines with a swine δ1-H1N2 were formulated with different commercial adjuvants: OW1, OW2, nano-emulsion squalene-based (NE) and gel polymer (GP). Pigs were vaccinated twice by the intramuscular route, 3 weeks apart, then challenged with an H1N1pdm09 three weeks post-boost and necropsied at 5 days post infection. All WIV vaccines elicited antibodies detected using the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay against the homologous vaccine virus, but not against the heterologous challenge virus; in contrast, all vaccinated groups had cross-reactive IgG antibody and IFN-γ responses against H1N1pdm09, with a higher magnitude observed in OW groups. Both OW groups demonstrated robust homologous HI titers and cross-reactivity against heterologous H1 viruses in the same genetic lineage. However, both OW groups had severe immunopathology consistent with VAERD after challenge when compared to NE, GP, and non-vaccinated challenge controls. None of the WIV formulations protected pigs from heterologous virus replication in the lungs or nasal cavity. Thus, although the type of adjuvant in the WIV formulation played a significant role in the magnitude of immune response to homologous and antigenically similar H1, none tested here increased the breadth of protection against the antigenically-distinct challenge virus, and some impacted immunopathology after challenge.
甲型流感病毒(IAV)在美国的猪群中造成了疾病负担,由于在猪群中循环的 IAV 具有大量的遗传和抗原多样性,因此难以预防。使用油包水(OW)佐剂配制的全灭活病毒(WIV)疫苗通常用于猪。然而,当疫苗株的血凝素和神经氨酸酶与挑战病毒不匹配时,WIV-OW 与疫苗相关增强呼吸道疾病(VAERD)相关。在这里,我们评估了 WIV 疫苗配方中不同类型的佐剂是否会影响 VAERD 结果。使用不同的商业佐剂配制了 WIV 疫苗,针对猪δ1-H1N2:OW1、OW2、基于纳米乳液角鲨烯的(NE)和凝胶聚合物(GP)。猪通过肌肉途径两次接种疫苗,间隔 3 周,然后在加强后 3 周用 H1N1pdm09 进行攻毒,并在感染后 5 天进行剖检。所有 WIV 疫苗都能通过血凝抑制(HI)试验检测到针对同源疫苗病毒的抗体,但不能检测到针对异源挑战病毒的抗体;相反,所有接种疫苗的组均对 H1N1pdm09 具有交叉反应性 IgG 抗体和 IFN-γ 反应,OW 组的反应幅度更高。OW 两组均表现出针对同源 HI 滴度和相同遗传谱系中异源 H1 病毒的交叉反应性。然而,与 NE、GP 和未接种挑战对照相比,OW 两组在挑战后均表现出严重的免疫病理学,与 VAERD 一致。没有一种 WIV 配方能保护猪免受肺部或鼻腔中异源病毒的复制。因此,尽管 WIV 配方中的佐剂类型在对同源和抗原相似的 H1 的免疫反应幅度方面起着重要作用,但这里测试的佐剂都没有增加对抗原不同的挑战病毒的保护范围,并且一些佐剂在挑战后会影响免疫病理学。