de Vries S, Huys R, Zanone P G
Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Université de Toulouse, UMR 5549 CERCO (Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition), UPS, CNRS, Pavillon Baudot CHU Purpan, 31052, Toulouse, France.
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Dec;236(12):3181-3190. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5369-1. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
In a cyclical Fitts' task, hand movements transition from continuous to discrete movements when the Index of Difficulty (ID) increases. Moreover, at high ID (small target), the eyes saccade to and subsequently fixate the targets at every movement, while at low ID (large target) intermittent monitoring is used. By hypothesis, the (periodic) gaze shifts are abandoned for movement times shorter than about 0.350 s due to systemic constraints (i.e., a refractory period and intrinsic latency). If so, the transition in eye and hand movements is independent. To investigate these issues, the present study examined the effects of changing ID via the targets' width or distance as well as hysteresis in eye-hand coordination. To this aim, 14 participants performed a cyclical Fitts' task while their hand and eye movements were recorded simultaneously. The results show that the transition in eye-hand synchronization (at 2.87 bit; 0.25 s) and in hand dynamics (at 4.85 bit; 0.81 s) neither co-occurred nor correlated. Some small width vs. distance dissociations and hysteresis effects were found, but they disappeared when eye-hand synchronization was viewed as a function of movement time rather than ID. This confirms that a minimal between-saccade time is the limiting factor in eye-hand synchronization. Additionally, the timing between the start of the hand movement and the saccade appeared to be relatively constant (at 0.15 s) and independent of movement time, implying a constant delay that should be implemented in a dynamical model of eye-hand coordination.
在周期性的菲茨任务中,当难度指数(ID)增加时,手部动作会从连续动作转变为离散动作。此外,在高ID(小目标)时,眼睛在每次动作时都会扫视并随后注视目标,而在低ID(大目标)时则使用间歇性监测。根据假设,由于系统限制(即不应期和固有潜伏期),对于短于约0.350秒的动作时间,(周期性的)注视转移会被放弃。如果是这样,眼睛和手部动作的转变是独立的。为了研究这些问题,本研究通过改变目标的宽度或距离以及眼手协调中的滞后现象来检验ID变化的影响。为此,14名参与者执行了一项周期性的菲茨任务,同时记录他们的手部和眼睛动作。结果表明,眼手同步(在2.87比特;0.25秒)和手部动力学(在4.85比特;0.81秒)的转变既不同时发生也不相关。发现了一些小的宽度与距离的分离以及滞后效应,但当将眼手同步视为动作时间而非ID的函数时,它们就消失了。这证实了最小扫视间隔时间是眼手同步的限制因素。此外,手部动作开始与扫视之间的时间似乎相对恒定(在0.15秒)且与动作时间无关,这意味着在眼手协调的动力学模型中应纳入一个恒定的延迟。