• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作者对科学出版物署名概念的认识:印度牙科教师的观点。

Authors' awareness of concepts in the authorship of scientific publications: Viewpoints of the dental faculty in India.

作者信息

Punyani Silky Rajesh, Deshpande Ashwini

机构信息

Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, People's Dental Academy, Bhopal, India.

出版信息

J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2018 Sep-Dec;8(3):151-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jobcr.2016.05.001
PMID:30191098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6108114/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a great deal of enthusiasm amongst the contemporary dental academicians and researchers to publish their research findings and interesting cases. The competitive atmosphere has fostered a 'publish or perish' sentiment following which authors sideline certain essential and valid concepts in authorship and at times resort to unethical behavior knowingly or unknowingly to expand their publication list.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

We attempted to assess the current knowledge of the Indian dental teaching faculty regarding some important basic concepts in scientific authorship by means of a questionnaire-based pilot study. The respondents were asked questions pertaining to their knowledge of terms such as "authorship criteria", "conflict of interest", "plagiarism", and other authorship issues.

RESULTS

Our findings suggested significant lacunae regarding the authors' understanding of important basic concepts in scientific writing.

CONCLUSION

We suggest possible measures to address this concern and also aim to survey a larger section of the academia in the future.

摘要

背景

当代牙科院士和研究人员热衷于发表他们的研究成果和有趣的病例。竞争氛围催生了一种“不发表就出局”的情绪,在此之后,作者们将某些基本且有效的署名概念搁置一旁,有时有意或无意地采取不道德行为来扩充他们的发表列表。

材料与方法

我们试图通过一项基于问卷调查的试点研究,评估印度牙科教师对科学署名中一些重要基本概念的当前认知。向受访者询问了与他们对“署名标准”“利益冲突”“剽窃”等术语以及其他署名问题的了解相关的问题。

结果

我们的研究结果表明,作者对科学写作中重要基本概念的理解存在重大缺陷。

结论

我们提出了应对这一问题的可能措施,并打算在未来对更大范围的学术界进行调查。

相似文献

1
Authors' awareness of concepts in the authorship of scientific publications: Viewpoints of the dental faculty in India.作者对科学出版物署名概念的认识:印度牙科教师的观点。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2018 Sep-Dec;8(3):151-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 20.
2
Unethical authorship practices: A qualitative study in Malaysian higher education institutions.不道德的署名行为:马来西亚高等教育机构的一项定性研究。
Dev World Bioeth. 2018 Sep;18(3):271-278. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12200. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
3
Biomedical authors' awareness of publication ethics: an international survey.生物医学作者对出版伦理的认识:一项国际调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e021282. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021282.
4
Scientific misconducts and authorship conflicts: Indian perspective.科学不端行为与作者身份冲突:印度视角
Indian J Anaesth. 2015 Jul;59(7):400-5. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.160918.
5
Awareness of authorship criteria and conflict: survey in a medical institution in India.对作者身份标准和冲突的认知:印度一家医疗机构的调查
MedGenMed. 2006 Dec 12;8(4):52.
6
[SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS: ON HONORS AND GHOSTS].[科学出版物:关于荣誉与幽灵]
Harefuah. 2017 Jun;156(6):365-368.
7
No room for ambiguity: The concepts of appropriate and inappropriate authorship in scientific publications.不容含糊:科学出版物中署名适当与不适当的概念。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;69(1):36-41. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2221_20.
8
Guide, Co-guide, Supervisors as Author in Publication on Student Thesis.指导教师、合作指导教师、导师在学生学位论文上署名。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2021 Sep 6;19(2):434-436. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v19i2.3670.
9
Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers.作者身份、抄袭与利益冲突:低收入/中等收入国家卫生研究人员的观点与做法
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 22;7(11):e018467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018467.
10
Authorship ethics in the radiological sciences.放射科学中的作者伦理规范。
Australas Radiol. 1994 Feb;38(1):2-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1994.tb00114.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Authors' awareness of concepts in the authorship.作者对署名相关概念的认知。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;9(2):122. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2018.12.002. Epub 2019 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Authorship issues.作者身份问题。
Lung India. 2012 Jan;29(1):76-80. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.92371.
2
Gift authorship - A cause for concern.馈赠署名——一个值得关注的问题。
Lung India. 2011 Jul;28(3):232-3. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.83994.
3
Ghostwriting at elite academic medical centers in the United States.美国顶尖学术医学中心的代写现象。
PLoS Med. 2010 Feb 2;7(2):e1000230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000230.
4
An author's guide to publication ethics: a review of emerging standards in biomedical journals.作者出版伦理指南:生物医学期刊新兴标准综述
Headache. 2009 Apr;49(4):578-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01379.x.
5
Repairing research integrity.修复研究诚信。
Nature. 2008 Jun 19;453(7198):980-2. doi: 10.1038/453980a.
6
Scientists behaving badly.行为不端的科学家。
Nature. 2005 Jun 9;435(7043):737-8. doi: 10.1038/435737a.
7
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE): Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication.国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE):向生物医学期刊投稿的统一要求:生物医学出版物的写作与编辑
Haematologica. 2004 Mar;89(3):264.
8
Consensus and contention regarding redundant publications in clinical research: cross-sectional survey of editors and authors.临床研究中关于重复发表的共识与争议:对编辑和作者的横断面调查
J Med Ethics. 2003 Apr;29(2):109-14. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.2.109.
9
Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals.同行评审医学期刊中存在名誉作者和代笔作者文章的比例。
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):222-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.222.
10
Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study.隐匿性重复发表对荟萃分析的影响:一项案例研究
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):635-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.635.