Edwards Sydney G, Maggs David J, Byrne Barbara A, Kass Philip H, Lassaline Mary E
Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California.
Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California, Davis, California.
Vet Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul;22(4):415-422. doi: 10.1111/vop.12604. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
To investigate the effect of topically applied proparacaine on bacterial and fungal culture results and to compare cytologic and culture results in patients with ulcerative keratitis.
Corneal samples were collected from 33 dogs, 19 horses, and 12 cats with spontaneously arising ulcerative keratitis. Samples for bacterial (dogs, cats, horses) and fungal (horses) cultures were collected prior to and following application of 0.5% proparacaine or saline. All patients then received a topical anesthetic, and samples were collected for cytology. Frequency of cultivatable bacteria before (Swab 1) and after (Swab 2) application of proparacaine or saline was compared using Fisher's exact test. Homogeneity of culture and cytology results was assessed using McNemar's test.
No difference was detected in number of animals from which bacteria were isolated from Swab 1 or Swab 2 for proparacaine (21/37 and 17/37, respectively) or saline (10/27 and 12/27, respectively). Small numbers prevented analysis of fungal culture results in horses between Swab 1 and Swab 2 for proparacaine (2/12 and 1/12, respectively) or saline (both, 1/8). Bacteria were isolated from 10 of 20 horses and detected cytologically in 3 of these; fungi were isolated from 3 of 20 horses and detected cytologically in 2 of these. Bacteria were detected more frequently using culture (31/64) than cytology (19/64).
Proparacaine did not significantly alter bacterial or fungal culture results in cats, dogs, or horses; however, clinical significance warrants investigation. Culture and cytology provided complementary data; both should be performed to maximize organism detection in patients with ulcerative keratitis.
研究局部应用丙美卡因对细菌和真菌培养结果的影响,并比较溃疡性角膜炎患者的细胞学和培养结果。
从33只犬、19匹马和12只猫身上采集角膜样本,这些动物均患有自发性溃疡性角膜炎。在应用0.5%丙美卡因或生理盐水之前和之后,采集用于细菌(犬、猫、马)和真菌(马)培养的样本。所有患者随后接受局部麻醉,并采集样本进行细胞学检查。使用Fisher精确检验比较丙美卡因或生理盐水应用前(拭子1)和应用后(拭子2)可培养细菌的频率。使用McNemar检验评估培养和细胞学结果的同质性。
对于丙美卡因(分别为21/37和17/37)或生理盐水(分别为10/27和12/27),从拭子1或拭子2中分离出细菌的动物数量没有差异。由于数量较少,无法分析丙美卡因(分别为2/12和1/12)或生理盐水(均为1/8)应用前后马的真菌培养结果。从20匹马中的10匹中分离出细菌,其中3匹通过细胞学检测到;从20匹马中的3匹中分离出真菌,其中2匹通过细胞学检测到。使用培养法(31/64)比细胞学方法(19/64)更频繁地检测到细菌。
丙美卡因对猫、犬或马的细菌或真菌培养结果没有显著影响;然而,其临床意义值得研究。培养和细胞学提供了互补的数据;对于溃疡性角膜炎患者,应同时进行这两种检查以最大程度地检测病原体。