Suppr超能文献

宫颈癌筛查中的人乳头瘤病毒自我采样:不同邀请策略在不同社会经济群体中的效果——一项随机对照试验

HPV self-sampling in cervical cancer screening: the effect of different invitation strategies in various socioeconomic groups - a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Tranberg Mette, Bech Bodil Hammer, Blaakær Jan, Jensen Jørgen Skov, Svanholm Hans, Andersen Berit

机构信息

Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark,

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark,

出版信息

Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 23;10:1027-1036. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S164826. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Participation in cervical cancer screening varies by socioeconomic status. The aims were to assess if offering human papilloma virus (HPV) self-sampling kits has an effect on screening participation among various socioeconomic groups and to determine if two invitation strategies for offering self-sampling influence the participation rate equally.

METHODS

The study was based on registry data that were applied to data from a randomized controlled trial (n=9,791) measuring how offering HPV self-sampling affected screening participation. The women received either 1) a self-sampling kit mailed directly to their homes (directly mailed group); 2) an invitation to order the kit (opt-in group); or 3) a standard second reminder to attend regular cytology screening (control group). The participation data were linked to registries containing socioeconomic information.

RESULTS

Women in the directly mailed group participated significantly more than women in the control group, regardless of their socioeconomic status, but the largest effects were observed in Western immigrants (participation difference [PD]=18.1%, 95% CI=10.2%-26.0%) and social welfare recipients (PD=15.2%, 95% CI=9.7%-20.6%). Compared with the control group, opt-in self-sampling only had an insignificant effect on participation among women who were immigrants, retired, or less educated. Western immigrants had a significantly higher increase in participation than native Danish women when kits were mailed directly compared with the opt-in strategy (PD=18.1%, 95% CI=10.2%-26.2% and PD=5.5%, 95% CI=2.9%-8.1%, respectively, =0.01).

CONCLUSION

All socioeconomic groups benefited from the directly mailed strategy in terms of higher screening participation, but Western immigrants and lower socioeconomic groups seemed to benefit the most. Immigrants and some lower socioeconomic groups only had insignificant benefits of opt-in self-sampling. The directly mailed strategy might be preferable to opt-in self-sampling because it ensures that ethnic minority groups obtain benefits of introducing HPV self-sampling in an organized cervical cancer screening program.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials NCT02680262. Registered February 10, 2016.

摘要

背景

宫颈癌筛查的参与情况因社会经济地位而异。本研究旨在评估提供人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自检试剂盒是否会对不同社会经济群体的筛查参与率产生影响,并确定两种提供自检试剂盒的邀请策略对参与率的影响是否相同。

方法

本研究基于登记数据,这些数据来自一项随机对照试验(n = 9,791),该试验测量了提供HPV自检对筛查参与率的影响。女性被分为三组:1)直接邮寄到家的自检试剂盒(直接邮寄组);2)订购试剂盒的邀请(选择加入组);3)参加常规细胞学筛查的标准二次提醒(对照组)。参与数据与包含社会经济信息的登记处相关联。

结果

无论社会经济地位如何,直接邮寄组的女性参与率均显著高于对照组,但在西方移民(参与差异[PD]=18.1%,95%可信区间[CI]=10.2%-26.0%)和社会福利领取者(PD=15.2%,95%CI=9.7%-20.6%)中观察到的影响最大。与对照组相比,选择加入自检对移民、退休或受教育程度较低的女性的参与率影响不显著。与选择加入策略相比,直接邮寄试剂盒时,西方移民的参与率显著高于丹麦本土女性(PD分别为18.1%,95%CI=10.2%-26.2%和PD=5.5%,95%CI=2.9%-8.1%,P=0.01)。

结论

就更高的筛查参与率而言,所有社会经济群体都从直接邮寄策略中受益,但西方移民和社会经济地位较低的群体似乎受益最大。移民和一些社会经济地位较低的群体从选择加入自检中获得的益处不显著。直接邮寄策略可能比选择加入自检更可取,因为它确保了少数族裔群体在有组织的宫颈癌筛查计划中从引入HPV自检中获益。

试验注册

当前受控试验NCT02680262。2016年2月10日注册。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验