Liu Ching-Yi, Ko Hsin-Kuo, Fink James B, Wan Gwo-Hwa, Huang Chung-Chi, Chen Yu-Chun, Lin Hui-Ling
Department of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.
Division of Respiratory therapy, Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan.
Pharmaceutics. 2019 Sep 5;11(9):459. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11090459.
Although aerosol delivery through mechanical ventilators has been used to administer various medications, little is known of administration with colistin. This in vitro evaluation aimed to evaluate size distribution of colistin delivery by different types of nebulizers and concentrations during mechanical ventilation. Colistin methanesulfonate (colistin) for injection was dissolved in 6 mL of distilled water to produce a low concentration (L; 156 mg) and a high concentration (H; 312 mg). A dose volume of 6 mL was placed in a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) and a jet nebulizer (JN). The inhaled mass (mean ± SD) of the VMN-L (53.80 ± 14.79 mg) was greater than both the JN-L (19.82 ± 3.34 mg, = 0.001) and JN-H (31.72 ± 4.48 mg, = 0.017). The nebulization time of the VMN-L (42.35 ± 2.30 min) was two times longer than the JN-L (21.12 ± 0.8 min) or JN-H (21.65 ± 0.42 min; < 0.001). The mass median aerodynamic distal to the endotracheal tube was within a similar range at 2.03 to 2.26 μm ( = 0.434), independent of neb or formulation concentration. In conclusion, the VMN-L yields greater inhaled mass than the JN with either concentration. Therefore, a standard nominal dose of colistin results in a higher delivered dose during mechanical ventilation with a VMN compared with a JN and may be considered the preferred device. If JN must be used, multiple doses of low concentration colistin may compensate for poor delivery performance.
尽管通过机械通气进行气雾剂给药已被用于多种药物的输送,但关于用黏菌素给药的情况却知之甚少。这项体外评估旨在评估在机械通气期间,不同类型雾化器输送黏菌素的粒径分布和浓度。将注射用黏菌素甲磺酸盐(黏菌素)溶解于6 mL蒸馏水中,制成低浓度(L;156 mg)和高浓度(H;312 mg)溶液。将6 mL剂量体积的溶液分别置于振动网式雾化器(VMN)和喷射雾化器(JN)中。VMN-L组的吸入质量(均值±标准差)为(53.80±14.79 mg),大于JN-L组(19.82±3.34 mg,P = 0.001)和JN-H组(31.72±4.48 mg,P = 0.017)。VMN-L组的雾化时间(42.35±2.30分钟)比JN-L组(21.12±0.8分钟)或JN-H组(21.65±0.42分钟;P<0.001)长两倍。气管插管远端的质量中位空气动力学直径在2.03至2.26μm的相似范围内(P = 0.434),与雾化器类型或制剂浓度无关。总之,无论浓度如何,VMN-L产生的吸入质量均大于JN。因此,与JN相比,在使用VMN进行机械通气时,标准标称剂量的黏菌素可导致更高的输送剂量,VMN可被视为首选设备。如果必须使用JN,多次低浓度黏菌素给药可能会弥补输送性能不佳的问题。