Clinical implications of the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).
作者信息
Fernando Shannon M, Rochwerg Bram, Seely Andrew J E
机构信息
Division of Critical Care (Fernando, Seely), Department of Medicine; Department of Emergency Medicine (Fernando), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Division of Critical Care (Rochwerg), Department of Medicine, and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Rochwerg), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Surgery (Seely), University of Ottawa; Clinical Epidemiology Program (Seely), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.
出版信息
CMAJ. 2018 Sep 10;190(36):E1058-E1059. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170149.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Clinical implications of the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症和脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义（Sepsis-3）》的临床意义
CMAJ. 2018 Sep 10;190(36):E1058-E1059. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170149.
2
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义（脓毒症-3）》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
3
[New definitions for sepsis and septic shock - Sepsis-3].[脓毒症和脓毒性休克的新定义——脓毒症-3]
Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek. 2016 Dec;22(4):141-143.
4
Potential Impact of the 2016 Consensus Definitions of Sepsis and Septic Shock on Future Sepsis Research.2016年脓毒症及脓毒性休克共识定义对未来脓毒症研究的潜在影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;70(4):553-561.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.007.
5
An Emergency Department Validation of the SEP-3 Sepsis and Septic Shock Definitions and Comparison With 1992 Consensus Definitions.急诊科对SEP-3脓毒症和脓毒性休克定义的验证及与1992年共识定义的比较
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;70(4):544-552.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
6
[New definition of and diagnostic criteria for sepsis - Swedish use of Sepsis-3].[脓毒症的新定义及诊断标准——瑞典对脓毒症-3的应用]
Lakartidningen. 2018 Mar 26;115:E3W9.
7
PIRO and sepsis stratification: reality or a mirage?脓毒症诱导序贯器官衰竭评分（PIRO）与脓毒症分层：是现实还是幻影？
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2015 Jul-Sep;27(3):196-8. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20150038. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
8
New Sepsis and Septic Shock Definitions: Clinical Implications and Controversies.新的脓毒症和脓毒性休克定义：临床意义与争议
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017 Sep;31(3):397-413. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
9
The Impact of the Sepsis-3 Septic Shock Definition on Previously Defined Septic Shock Patients.脓毒症-3脓毒性休克定义对先前定义的脓毒性休克患者的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;45(9):1436-1442. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002512.
10
Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).制定脓毒性休克的新定义并评估新的临床标准：用于第三次脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际共识定义（Sepsis-3）。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.
引用本文的文献
1
A predictive model for sepsis risk in patients with non-traumatic cerebral hemorrhage based on the MIMIC-IV database.基于MIMIC-IV数据库的非创伤性脑出血患者脓毒症风险预测模型
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 9;15(1):24765. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10119-6.
2
Sivelestat-Loaded Neutrophil-Membrane-Coated Antioxidative Nanoparticles for Targeted Endothelial Protection in Sepsis.载有西维来司他的中性粒细胞膜包被抗氧化纳米颗粒用于脓毒症中靶向性内皮保护
Pharmaceutics. 2025 Jun 10;17(6):766. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17060766.
3
Prehospital Performance of Five Early Warning Scores to Predict Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Suspected Respiratory Infections.五种早期预警评分在预测疑似呼吸道感染患者长期死亡率方面的院前表现
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 19;15(12):1565. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15121565.
4
Diagnostic value of the combined detection of serum tumor necrosis factor-α and fecal calprotectin in early sepsis-related encephalopathy.血清肿瘤坏死因子-α与粪便钙卫蛋白联合检测在早期脓毒症相关性脑病中的诊断价值
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 2;12:1598624. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1598624. eCollection 2025.
5
Intelligent Prediction Platform for Sepsis Risk Based on Real-Time Dynamic Temporal Features: Design Study.基于实时动态时间特征的脓毒症风险智能预测平台：设计研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 May 30;13:e74940. doi: 10.2196/74940.
6
Endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases: mechanisms and in vitro models.心血管疾病中的内皮功能障碍：机制与体外模型
Mol Cell Biochem. 2025 Apr 21. doi: 10.1007/s11010-025-05289-w.
7
Prognostic impact of hypernatremia for septic shock patients in the intensive care unit.高钠血症对重症监护病房感染性休克患者的预后影响。
World J Clin Cases. 2025 Mar 6;13(7):95430. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i7.95430.
8
Identifying key blood markers for bacteremia in elderly patients: insights into bacterial pathogens.识别老年患者菌血症的关键血液标志物：对细菌病原体的见解
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jan 16;14:1472765. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1472765. eCollection 2024.
9
The Role of Dectin-1-Akt-RNF146 Pathway in β-Glucan Induced Immune Trained State of Monocyte in Sepsis.Dectin-1-Akt-RNF146信号通路在β-葡聚糖诱导脓毒症单核细胞免疫训练状态中的作用
J Inflamm Res. 2025 Jan 24;18:1147-1165. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S482213. eCollection 2025.
10
Serial Procalcitonin Measurements for Determining Bacterial Infection and Mortality in Cirrhotic Patients With Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome.连续检测降钙素原用于确定伴有全身炎症反应综合征的肝硬化患者的细菌感染及死亡率
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 1;16(3):e00810. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000810.
本文引用的文献
1
Prognostic Accuracy of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Mortality in Patients With Suspected Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估对疑似感染患者死亡率的预后准确性：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 20;168(4):266-275. doi: 10.7326/M17-2820. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
2
The Impact of the Sepsis-3 Septic Shock Definition on Previously Defined Septic Shock Patients.脓毒症-3脓毒性休克定义对先前定义的脓毒性休克患者的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;45(9):1436-1442. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002512.
3
Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis.脓毒症强制紧急治疗的治疗时间与死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2235-2244. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703058. Epub 2017 May 21.
4
Reducing the global burden of sepsis.减轻全球脓毒症负担。
CMAJ. 2017 Jan 9;189(1):E2-E3. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160798.
5
qSOFA does not replace SIRS in the definition of sepsis.在脓毒症的定义中，快速序贯器官功能衰竭评分（qSOFA）并不能取代全身炎症反应综合征（SIRS）。
Crit Care. 2016 Jul 17;20(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1389-z.
6
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义（脓毒症-3）》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
7
Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).制定脓毒性休克的新定义并评估新的临床标准：用于第三次脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际共识定义（Sepsis-3）。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.
8
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估：针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》（Sepsis-3）。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
9
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis.全身性炎症反应综合征标准在严重脓毒症中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 23;372(17):1629-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415236. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
10
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study.拯救脓毒症运动：一项为期7.5年的研究中绩效指标与结果之间的关联
Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000723.
Zotero 插件