University of California Davis MIND Institute, Sacramento, CA, USA.
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Feb;49(2):632-646. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3740-5.
Short-term low intensity parent implemented intervention studies for toddlers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have found it difficult to demonstrate significantly improved developmental scores or autism severity compared to community treatment. We conducted a randomized comparative intent-to-treat study of a parent implemented intervention to (1) test the effects of an enhanced version on parent and child learning, and (2) evaluate the sensitivity to change of proximal versus distal measures of child behavior. We randomized 45 children with ASD, 12-30 months of age, into one of two versions of parent-implemented Early Start Denver Model (P-ESDM), the basic model, in which we delivered 1.5 h of clinic-based parent coaching weekly, and an enhanced version that contained three additions: motivational interviewing, multimodal learning tools, and a weekly 1.5-h home visit. We delivered the intervention for 12 weeks and measured child and parent change frequently in multiple settings. We found a time-by-group interaction: parents in the enhanced group demonstrated significantly greater gains in interaction skills than did parents in the non-enhanced group. Both interventions were associated with significant developmental acceleration; however, child outcomes did not differ by group. We found a significant relationship between degree of change in parental interaction skill and rate of children's improvement on our proximal measure. Parents in both groups reported satisfaction with the intervention. These findings suggest that parent skills improved more in the enhanced group than the comparison group. Children in the two groups showed similar improvements. Rate of individual parent learning was associated with greater individual child progress on a measure quite proximal to the treatment, though not on standardized assessments.
针对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)幼儿的短期低强度家长实施干预研究发现,与社区治疗相比,其在发展评分或自闭症严重程度方面很难显示出显著改善。我们进行了一项家长实施干预的随机对照意向治疗研究,旨在:(1) 检验增强版对家长和孩子学习的影响,以及 (2) 评估儿童行为的近端和远端测量的变化敏感性。我们将 45 名年龄在 12-30 个月的 ASD 儿童随机分为两种家长实施早期开始丹佛模式 (P-ESDM) 的版本:基础版本,我们每周提供 1.5 小时的基于诊所的家长辅导;增强版本包含三个附加内容:动机访谈、多模态学习工具和每周 1.5 小时的家访。我们进行了 12 周的干预,并在多个环境中频繁测量儿童和家长的变化。我们发现存在时间与组间的交互作用:增强组的家长在互动技能方面表现出显著更大的进步,而非增强组的家长则没有。两种干预都与显著的发展加速有关;然而,儿童的结果并没有因组而异。我们发现父母互动技能变化的程度与我们的近端测量中儿童改善的速度之间存在显著的关系。两组家长都对干预表示满意。这些发现表明,增强组的家长技能比对照组有了更大的提高。两组儿童都表现出相似的进步。个别家长学习的速度与在相当接近治疗的测量中孩子取得更大进步的个体有关,尽管与标准化评估无关。