• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

OECD 国家和主要发展中国家医疗保健支出与经济增长之间的非线性格兰杰因果关系。

Nonlinear Granger Causality between Health Care Expenditure and Economic Growth in the OECD and Major Developing Countries.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 7;15(9):1953. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091953.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph15091953
PMID:30205463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6163394/
Abstract

Differing from previous studies ignoring the nonlinear features, this study employs both the linear and nonlinear Granger causality tests to examine the complex causal relationship between health care expenditure and economic growth among 15 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and 5 major developing countries. Some interesting findings can be obtained as follows: (1) For Australia, Austria, and UK, linear and nonlinear Granger causality does not exist between them. A unidirectional linear or nonlinear causality running from economic growth to health care expenditure can be found for Ireland, Korea, Portugal, and India. For these seven countries, health or fiscal policy related to health spending will not have an impact on economic growth; (2) For Belgium, Norway, and Mexico, only a unidirectional linear causality runs from health care expenditure to economic growth, while bidirectional linear causality can be found for Canada, Finland, Iceland, New Zealand, Spain, Brazil, and South Africa. Especially for the US, China, and Japan, a unidirectional nonlinear causality exists from health spending to economic growth. To improve the quality of national health, life quality and happiness, these 13 countries should actively look to optimise policy related to health care expenditure, such as by enhancing the efficiency of health costs to promote sustainable economic development.

摘要

与之前忽略非线性特征的研究不同,本研究采用线性和非线性格兰杰因果检验来考察经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的 15 个成员国和 5 个主要发展中国家的医疗保健支出与经济增长之间的复杂因果关系。有如下一些有趣的发现:(1)对于澳大利亚、奥地利和英国,它们之间不存在线性和非线性格兰杰因果关系。爱尔兰、韩国、葡萄牙和印度存在从经济增长到医疗保健支出的单向线性或非线性因果关系。对于这七个国家,与医疗支出相关的卫生或财政政策不会对经济增长产生影响;(2)对于比利时、挪威和墨西哥,只有从医疗保健支出到经济增长的单向线性因果关系,而加拿大、芬兰、冰岛、新西兰、西班牙、巴西和南非则存在双向线性因果关系。特别是对于美国、中国和日本,存在从医疗支出到经济增长的单向非线性因果关系。为了提高国家卫生质量、生活质量和幸福感,这 13 个国家应积极优化与医疗保健支出相关的政策,例如通过提高卫生费用效率来促进可持续经济发展。

相似文献

1
Nonlinear Granger Causality between Health Care Expenditure and Economic Growth in the OECD and Major Developing Countries.OECD 国家和主要发展中国家医疗保健支出与经济增长之间的非线性格兰杰因果关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 7;15(9):1953. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091953.
2
Systems GMM estimates of the health care spending and GDP relationship: a note.系统 GMM 对医疗支出与 GDP 关系的估计:注释。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Jun;14(3):503-6. doi: 10.1007/s10198-012-0394-7. Epub 2012 May 13.
3
Pharmaceutical expenditure and total health-care expenditure in OECD countries and China: bidirectional Granger causality on the basis of health level.经合组织国家和中国的药品支出和总医疗保健支出:基于健康水平的双向格兰杰因果关系。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Apr;22(3):505-512. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1605292. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
4
[Family planning. A survey of United Nations around the world].[计划生育。一项关于全球联合国的调查]
Courr Unesco. 1974 Jul-Aug;27:46-8.
5
How much do we spend on prescription medicines? Out-of-pocket costs for patients in Australia and other OECD countries.我们在处方药上花费了多少钱?澳大利亚及其他经合组织国家患者的自付费用。
Aust Health Rev. 2011 Aug;35(3):341-9. doi: 10.1071/AH10906.
6
More Health Expenditure, Better Economic Performance? Empirical Evidence From OECD Countries.更多的医疗支出,能带来更好的经济表现?来自经合组织国家的实证证据。
Inquiry. 2015 Aug 25;52. doi: 10.1177/0046958015602666. Print 2015.
7
The pill in figures and facts.数据与事实中的避孕药
Adv Fertil Control. 1967;2:1-5.
8
Fiscal rules, powerful levers for controlling the health budget? Evidence from 32 OECD countries.财政规则:控制医疗预算的有力杠杆?来自 32 个经合组织国家的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Mar 1;18(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5198-y.
9
The cost of aging: Economic growth perspectives for Europe.衰老的代价:欧洲经济增长视角
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287207. eCollection 2023.
10
International health care spending.国际医疗保健支出。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1986 Fall;5(3):111-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.5.3.111.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-led growth hypothesis and health financing systems: an econometric synthesis for OECD countries.健康导向型增长假说与卫生筹资系统:经合组织国家的计量经济学综合分析
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 24;12:1437304. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1437304. eCollection 2024.
2
The relationship between health insurance and economic performance: an empirical study based on meta-analysis.医疗保险与经济绩效的关系:基于元分析的实证研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 3;12:1365877. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1365877. eCollection 2024.
3
Influenza pandemics and macroeconomic fluctuations 1871-2016.1871 - 2016年流感大流行与宏观经济波动
Cliometrica (Berl). 2023 May 29:1-47. doi: 10.1007/s11698-023-00269-w.
4
The trilemma among CO emissions, energy use, and economic growth in Russia.俄罗斯的 CO 排放、能源利用和经济增长之间的三难困境。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 23;13(1):10225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37251-5.
5
Impact of Coronavirus Disease COVID-19 on the Relationship between Healthcare Expenditures and Sustainable Economic Growth.**译文**:**新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)对医疗保健支出与可持续经济增长之间关系的影响**。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;20(4):3049. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043049.
6
Spending to grow or growing to spend? Relationship between public health expenditure and income of Indian states.是为增长而支出还是为支出而增长?印度各邦公共卫生支出与收入之间的关系。
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Dec 15;21:101310. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101310. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Health expenditures, environmental quality, and economic development: State-of-the-art review and findings in the context of COP26.卫生支出、环境质量与经济发展:基于《联合国气候变化框架公约》第二十六次缔约方会议的最新研究进展与发现
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;10:954080. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.954080. eCollection 2022.
8
Exploring the Dynamic Nexus Among Economic Growth, Industrialization, Medical Technology, and Healthcare Expenditure: A PMG-ARDL Panel Data Analysis on Income-Level Classification Along West African Economies.探索经济增长、工业化、医疗技术和医疗保健支出之间的动态关系:基于 PMG-ARDL 面板数据分析西非经济体的收入水平分类。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;10:903399. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.903399. eCollection 2022.
9
Measuring the Impact of Health on Economic Growth Using Pooling Data in Regions of Asia: Evidence From a Quantile-On-Quantile Analysis.利用亚洲地区汇总数据衡量健康对经济增长的影响:分位数-分位数分析的证据。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 31;9:689610. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.689610. eCollection 2021.
10
The Relationship Between "Protect People's Livelihood" and "Promote the Economy:" Provincial Evidence From China.“保民生”与“促经济”的关系:来自中国省级层面的证据。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 2;9:722062. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.722062. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Health care expenditures and GDP in Latin American and OECD countries: a comparison using a panel cointegration approach.拉丁美洲和经合组织国家的医疗保健支出与国内生产总值:基于面板协整方法的比较
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2019 Jun;19(2):115-153. doi: 10.1007/s10754-018-9250-3. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
2
The dynamic links between carbon dioxide (CO) emissions, health spending and GDP growth: A case study for 51 countries.二氧化碳(CO)排放、卫生支出与国内生产总值增长之间的动态联系:51个国家的案例研究
Environ Res. 2017 Oct;158:137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.041. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
3
Is health care a necessary or luxury product for Asian countries? An answer using panel approach.医疗保健对亚洲国家来说是必需品还是奢侈品?基于面板方法的解答。
Health Econ Rev. 2017 Dec;7(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13561-017-0144-8. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
4
Is income relevant for health expenditure and economic growth nexus?收入与卫生支出及经济增长之间的关系有关联吗?
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2016 Mar;16(1):23-49. doi: 10.1007/s10754-015-9179-8. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
5
Health-care expenditure and health policy in the USA versus other high-spending OECD countries.美国的医疗保健支出与卫生政策:与其他高支出经合组织国家相比。
Lancet. 2014 Jul 5;384(9937):83-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60571-7. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
6
The relationship between health and GDP in OECD countries in the very long run.经合组织国家在很长一段时期内的健康与 GDP 之间的关系。
Health Econ. 2011 Mar;20(3):306-22. doi: 10.1002/hec.1590.
7
Explaining China's regional health expenditures using LM-type unit root tests.使用LM型单位根检验解释中国的地区卫生支出
J Health Econ. 2007 Jul 1;26(4):682-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Jan 12.
8
Examining structural breaks and growth rates in international health expenditures.审视国际卫生支出中的结构突变和增长率。
J Health Econ. 2006 Sep;25(5):877-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.12.001. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
9
On the international stability of health care expenditure functions: are government and private functions similar?论医疗保健支出函数的国际稳定性:政府函数与私人函数相似吗?
J Health Econ. 2004 May;23(3):589-613. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.08.007.
10
Stationarity of health expenditures and GDP: evidence from panel unit root tests with heterogeneous structural breaks.卫生支出与国内生产总值的平稳性:来自具有异质结构断点的面板单位根检验的证据。
J Health Econ. 2003 Mar;22(2):313-23. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00122-4.