• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经合组织国家和中国的药品支出和总医疗保健支出:基于健康水平的双向格兰杰因果关系。

Pharmaceutical expenditure and total health-care expenditure in OECD countries and China: bidirectional Granger causality on the basis of health level.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Apr;22(3):505-512. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1605292. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1080/14737167.2019.1605292
PMID:30958724
Abstract

: Previous studies have ignored the bidirectional causality and the heterogeneity of health level. This study explored the bidirectional causality between pharmaceutical expenditure (PE) and total health-care expenditure (Total HCE) considering the health level for effective health investment and national health improvement.: Based on the panel data on PE and Total HCE in 32 OECD countries and China, the Granger causality test was applied. Countries were divided into low- and high-health-level (LH and HH) groups according to their life expectancies.: A 1% increase in the growth rate of per capita PE boosted a 0.11% increase in that of per capita Total HCE of the following year in HH group, whereas no such causality existed in LH group. A 1% increase in the growth rate of per capita Total HCE boosted a 0.46% increase in that of the per capita PE of the following year in LH group, whereas no such causality existed in HH group.: High-health-level countries should continue to increase the health investment by promoting rational PE growth such as expanding insurance coverage for innovative medicine for health improvement. Low-health-level countries should take optimizing policy to increase health investment in pharmaceutical for medicine accessibility and national health.

摘要

: 先前的研究忽视了健康水平的双向因果关系和异质性。本研究考虑健康水平,探讨了药品支出 (PE) 和总医疗保健支出 (Total HCE) 之间的双向因果关系,以实现有效的医疗投资和国家健康水平的提高。: 基于 OECD 国家和中国的药品支出和总医疗保健支出的面板数据,应用了格兰杰因果检验。根据预期寿命,将各国分为低健康水平 (LH) 和高健康水平 (HH) 两组。: 在 HH 组中,人均 PE 增长率每增加 1%,下一年人均 Total HCE 增长率将增加 0.11%,而在 LH 组中则不存在这种因果关系。在 LH 组中,人均 Total HCE 增长率每增加 1%,下一年人均 PE 增长率将增加 0.46%,而在 HH 组中则不存在这种因果关系。: 高健康水平国家应继续通过促进合理的 PE 增长来增加卫生投资,例如扩大对创新药物的保险覆盖范围,以促进健康改善。低健康水平国家应采取优化政策,增加药品投资,以提高药物可及性和国家健康水平。

相似文献

1
Pharmaceutical expenditure and total health-care expenditure in OECD countries and China: bidirectional Granger causality on the basis of health level.经合组织国家和中国的药品支出和总医疗保健支出:基于健康水平的双向格兰杰因果关系。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Apr;22(3):505-512. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1605292. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
2
Nonlinear Granger Causality between Health Care Expenditure and Economic Growth in the OECD and Major Developing Countries.OECD 国家和主要发展中国家医疗保健支出与经济增长之间的非线性格兰杰因果关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 7;15(9):1953. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091953.
3
ANALYSIS OF TRENDS IN LIFE EXPECTANCIES AND PER CAPITA GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT AS WELL AS PHARMACEUTICAL AND NON-PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTHCARE EXPENDITURES.人均预期寿命、人均国内生产总值以及医药和非医药医疗保健支出的趋势分析
Acta Pol Pharm. 2015 Sep-Oct;72(5):1045-50.
4
Trends in National Pharmaceutical Expenditure in Korea during 2011 - 2020.2011 - 2020年韩国全国药品支出趋势
Infect Chemother. 2023 Jun;55(2):237-246. doi: 10.3947/ic.2023.0028.
5
Government health expenditure, out-of-pocket payment and social inequality: A cross-national analysis of China and OECD countries.政府卫生支出、自付费用与社会不平等:对中国和经合组织国家的跨国分析。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020 Sep;35(5):1111-1126. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3017. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
6
The nexus among CO emission, health expenditure and economic development in the OECD countries: New insights from a cross-sectional ARDL model.经合组织国家 CO 排放、卫生支出与经济发展的关系:来自横截面 ARDL 模型的新见解。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Mar;31(11):16746-16769. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32081-y. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
7
The effect of carbon dioxide emission, GDP per capita and urban population on health expenditure in OECD countries: a panel ARDL approach.经合组织国家二氧化碳排放、人均国内生产总值和城市人口对卫生支出的影响:面板自回归分布滞后方法
Int J Environ Health Res. 2023 Dec;33(12):1233-1242. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2022.2083088. Epub 2022 May 30.
8
[Do we spend too much on medications? Pharmaceutical expenditures, an absolutely essential item in European countries].[我们在药物上的花费是否过高?药品支出,欧洲国家一项绝对必要的开支项目]
Aten Primaria. 2004 Mar 31;33(5):244-53. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(04)79410-x.
9
A quantile regression approach to panel data analysis of health-care expenditure in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries.定量回归方法在经合组织国家医疗保健支出面板数据分析中的应用。
Health Econ. 2018 Dec;27(12):1921-1944. doi: 10.1002/hec.3811. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
10
Impacts of Economic Freedom, Health, and Social Expenditures on Well-Being Measured by the Better Life Index in OECD Countries.经合组织国家中用更好生活指数衡量的经济自由、健康和社会支出对幸福感的影响。
Soc Work Public Health. 2022 Jul 4;37(5):435-447. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2021.2018083. Epub 2021 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding China's National Centralized Drug Procurement policy: a cross-sectional study in Shaanxi Province.医疗保健专业人员对中国国家集中药品采购政策的知识、态度和实践:陕西省的一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 20;13:1616534. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1616534. eCollection 2025.
2
An assessment of economy- and transport-oriented health performance.对经济与交通导向型健康绩效的评估。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Oct 3;14(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00544-0.
3
A quasi-experimental study of the volume-based procurement (VBP) effect on antiviral medications of hepatitis B virus in China.
一项关于中国基于量的采购(VBP)对乙型肝炎病毒抗病毒药物影响的准实验研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 5;14:984794. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.984794. eCollection 2023.
4
Were economic evaluations well reported for the newly listed oncology drugs in China's national reimbursement drug list.在中国国家医保药品目录新上市的肿瘤药物中,经济评价报告情况如何。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 3;22(1):1475. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08858-7.
5
The Effects of the National Centralized Drug Purchasing Pilot Program on Nucleos(t)ide Analogs in Shenzhen City: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.国家集中带量采购试点对深圳市核苷(酸)类似物使用的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 25;9:718013. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.718013. eCollection 2021.
6
Policies and Practices Catalyzing the Use of Generic Medicines: A Systematic Search and Review.推动通用药物使用的政策和实践:系统检索和综述。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021 Jan;31(1):167-178. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i1.19.