Rosa Vitor Modesto, Fores Joselia Maria Lira, da Silva Erika Priscila Ferreira, Guterres Elizeteh Oliveira, Marcelino Aline, Nogueira Paula Cristina, Baia Wania Regina Mollo, Kulcsar Marco Aurélio Vamondes
Servico de Nutricao e Dietetica, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Enfermagem, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018 Sep 6;73(suppl 1):e484s. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e484s.
The aim of this study was to use the scientific literature to identify interdisciplinary interventions for rehabilitation during the perioperative period for cancer patients who underwent total laryngectomy. We systematically researched controlled descriptors: laryngectomy, patient care team/education, patient care team/manpower, patient care team/methods, patient care team/utilization and rehabilitation. We performed a qualitative narrative synthesis and identified 549 articles. Of these, 113 were duplicates, 398 were excluded during the analysis of the title and abstract, 1 was excluded for unfeasibility of access, and 4 were excluded after reading the article in full, resulting in 33 included articles. The articles addressed different types of interdisciplinary actions, such as vocal, olfactory, pulmonary and alimentary rehabilitation; comparisons of prosthetic devices; and descriptions of practices for total laryngectomized patient rehabilitation. Although the interventions found in the literature were effective in the rehabilitation of the total laryngectomized patient, their interdisciplinarity was not evidenced but was highlighted in these studies as a factor for improvement in terms of practical assistance and quality of life.
本研究的目的是利用科学文献,为接受全喉切除术的癌症患者确定围手术期康复的跨学科干预措施。我们系统地检索了受控描述词:喉切除术、患者护理团队/教育、患者护理团队/人力、患者护理团队/方法、患者护理团队/利用和康复。我们进行了定性叙述性综合分析,共识别出549篇文章。其中,113篇为重复文章,398篇在标题和摘要分析过程中被排除,1篇因无法获取而被排除,4篇在全文阅读后被排除,最终纳入33篇文章。这些文章涉及不同类型的跨学科行动,如发声、嗅觉、肺部和消化道康复;假体装置的比较;以及全喉切除患者康复实践的描述。尽管文献中发现的干预措施对全喉切除患者的康复有效,但其跨学科性并未得到证实,但在这些研究中被强调为在实际援助和生活质量方面改善的一个因素。