Suppr超能文献

美国矫形外科医师学会网站上运动损伤与预防患者教育材料的可读性

Readability of Sports Injury and Prevention Patient Education Materials From the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Website.

作者信息

Minoughan Chelsea, Schumaier Adam, Kakazu Rafael, Grawe Brian

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Mar 20;2(3):e002. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00002. eCollection 2018 Mar.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the readability of 114 Sports Injury and Prevention patient education materials provided by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS).

METHODS

We evaluated all articles written in English posted under the Sports Injury and Prevention section of the AAOS website using readability software to compute six readability scores, which we compared with the eighth-grade level using a two-tailed one-sample Student -test.

RESULTS

The mean reading grade level calculated by each readability test was markedly higher than the eighth-grade level. We reported mean ± SD for each test: Flesch-Kincaid grade level (8.95 ± 1.51; < 0.001), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (11.53 ± 1.18; < 0.001), Coleman-Liau index (11.16 ± 1.33; < 0.001), Gunning Fog index (11.06 ± 1.63; < 0.001), New Dale-Chall (9.49 ± 1.66; < 0.001), and FORCAST formulas (10.96 ± 0.60; < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

This study shows that patient education materials provided by the AAOS concerning sports injury and prevention are written at a readability level too high for patients to understand. On average, patient materials are written at least 2.5 grade levels higher than national recommendations. Only 7% of the 114 articles had readability scores in line with national recommendations. These findings indicate a need for revised patient education materials geared toward bringing the readability level down to the recommended eighth-grade level.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在评估美国矫形外科医师学会(AAOS)提供的114份运动损伤与预防患者教育材料的可读性。

方法

我们使用可读性软件对AAOS网站运动损伤与预防板块下所有英文撰写的文章进行评估,计算六个可读性分数,并通过双尾单样本学生t检验将其与八年级水平进行比较。

结果

每项可读性测试计算出的平均阅读年级水平明显高于八年级水平。我们报告了每项测试的平均值±标准差:弗莱什-金凯德年级水平(8.95±1.51;P<0.001)、晦涩难懂简易度量法(11.53±1.18;P<0.001)、科尔曼-廖指数(11.16±1.33;P<0.001)、冈宁雾指数(11.06±1.63;P<0.001)、新戴尔-查尔公式(9.49±1.66;P<0.001)和FORCAST公式(10.96±0.60;P<0.001)。

讨论

本研究表明,AAOS提供的有关运动损伤与预防的患者教育材料的编写可读性水平过高,患者难以理解。平均而言,患者材料的编写水平比国家建议至少高2.5个年级。在114篇文章中,只有7%的可读性分数符合国家建议。这些发现表明需要修订患者教育材料,使其可读性水平降至建议的八年级水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf62/6132314/2865e7b54a5e/jagrr-2-e002-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验