Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Sep 13;17(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0358-5.
A lack of evidence and psychometrically sound measures of compassion necessitated the development of the first known, empirically derived, theoretical Patient Compassion Model (PCM) generated from qualitative interviews with advanced cancer inpatients. We aimed to assess the credibility and transferability of the PCM across diverse palliative populations and settings.
Semi-structured, audio-recorded qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 patients with life-limiting diagnoses, recruited from 4 settings (acute care, homecare, residential care, and hospice). Participants were first asked to share their understandings and experiences of compassion. They were then presented with an overview of the PCM and asked to determine whether: 1) the model resonated with their understanding and experiences of compassion; 2) the model required any modification(s); 3) they had further insights on the model's domains and/or themes. Members of the research team analyzed the qualitative data using constant comparative analysis.
Both patients' personal perspectives of compassion prior to viewing the model and their specific feedback after being provided an overview of the model confirmed the credibility and transferability of the PCM. While new codes were incorporated into the original coding schema, no new domains or themes emerged from this study sample. These additional codes provided a more comprehensive understanding of the nuances within the domains and themes of the PCM that will aid in the generation of items for an ongoing study to develop a patient reported measure of compassion.
A diverse palliative patient population confirmed the credibility and transferability of the PCM within palliative care, extending the rigour and applicability of the PCM that was originally developed within an advanced cancer population. The views of a diverse palliative patient population on compassion helped to validate previous codes and supplement the existing coding schema, informing the development of a guiding framework for the generation of a patient-reported measure of compassion.
由于缺乏证据和经过心理测量学验证的同情心衡量标准,我们开发了第一个已知的、基于实证的、源自与晚期癌症住院患者定性访谈的理论性患者同情心模型(PCM)。我们旨在评估 PCM 在不同的姑息治疗人群和环境中的可信度和可转移性。
对来自 4 个环境(急性护理、家庭护理、长期护理和临终关怀)的 20 名患有生命有限诊断的患者进行了半结构式、录音定性访谈。首先,要求参与者分享他们对同情心的理解和经验。然后,向他们介绍 PCM 概述,并要求他们确定:1)该模型是否与他们对同情心的理解和经验产生共鸣;2)该模型是否需要进行任何修改;3)他们对模型的领域和/或主题有进一步的见解。研究团队的成员使用恒定性比较分析方法对定性数据进行分析。
在观看模型之前,患者对同情心的个人看法以及在提供模型概述后他们的具体反馈都证实了 PCM 的可信度和可转移性。虽然在原始编码方案中纳入了新的代码,但本研究样本中没有出现新的领域或主题。这些附加代码提供了对 PCM 领域和主题内部细微差别的更全面理解,这将有助于为正在进行的研究生成患者报告的同情心衡量标准提供帮助。
多样化的姑息治疗患者群体在姑息治疗中证实了 PCM 的可信度和可转移性,扩展了最初在晚期癌症人群中开发的 PCM 的严谨性和适用性。多样化的姑息治疗患者群体对同情心的看法有助于验证先前的代码并补充现有的编码方案,为生成患者报告的同情心衡量标准提供指导框架。