• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际癌症控制联盟对第8版肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期系统更新版的预后验证:307例接受手术治疗的胆囊癌患者的生存分析

Prognostic validation of the updated 8th edition Tumor-Node-Metastasis classification by the Union for International Cancer Control: Survival analyses of 307 patients with surgically treated gallbladder carcinoma.

作者信息

Wang Li, Dong Ping, Zhang Yi, Yang Min, Chen Yang, Tian Bo-Le

机构信息

Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China.

Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China.

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2018 Oct;16(4):4427-4433. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9189. Epub 2018 Jul 23.

DOI:10.3892/ol.2018.9189
PMID:30214577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6126185/
Abstract

In December 2016, the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) published the 8th edition of the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) classification of malignant tumors, including a number of vital changes in the definitions of the T2 category, the N category and the stages of gallbladder cancer (GBC). The clinical value of this newly updated classification in patients with surgically treated GBC has not been rigorously validated. The present study aimed to analyze the prognosis of patients with GBC in a high-volume surgical unit, and to validate the prognostic value of the new UICC TNM classification, particularly the main changes in the stages of GBC. Data from 307 patients who were surgically treated and histopathologically diagnosed with GBC between January 2011 and July 2016 in The West China Hospital (Chengdu, Sichuan, China) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The new UICC criteria distributed 32, 60, 99 and 116 eligible patients in stages I, II, III and IV, respectively. The differences in overall survival time between each stage (I-IV) demonstrated statistical significance (P<0.05). As a result of the main change of this classification, the novel definitions of T2a and T2b effectively stratified the prognosis of patients with T2 GBC (P<0.001). Furthermore, patients with stage IIa tumors also obtained significantly improved overall survival time compared with patients with stage IIb tumors (P=0.04), whereas the comparison between patients with stage IIb and IIIa tumors did not present any notable difference (P=0.20). Additionally, the new N category stratified the survival of the patients effectively (P<0.001). Together with curative resection, this latest classification was indicated to be an independent predictor of survival via multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 6.25; 95% confidence interval, 3.81-10.26; P<0.001). In conclusion, the newly updated UICC TNM classification could effectively reflect the clinical outcome of patients with surgically treated GBC. Furthermore, tumor location could predict the survival of surgically treated T2 GBC. The novel classification of the N category by the number of lymph nodes involved was also demonstrated to be valid.

摘要

2016年12月,国际癌症控制联盟(UICC)发布了恶性肿瘤的第8版肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分类,其中包括胆囊癌(GBC)的T2类别、N类别和分期定义中的一些重要变化。这种新更新的分类在接受手术治疗的GBC患者中的临床价值尚未得到严格验证。本研究旨在分析在一个高容量手术科室中GBC患者的预后,并验证新的UICC TNM分类的预后价值,特别是GBC分期的主要变化。回顾性收集并分析了2011年1月至2016年7月期间在四川大学华西医院(中国四川成都)接受手术治疗并经组织病理学诊断为GBC的307例患者的数据。新的UICC标准将32例、60例、99例和116例符合条件的患者分别分为I期、II期、III期和IV期。各期(I-IV期)之间的总生存时间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。由于该分类的主要变化,T2a和T2b的新定义有效地对T2 GBC患者的预后进行了分层(P<0.001)。此外,IIa期肿瘤患者的总生存时间也比IIb期肿瘤患者有显著改善(P=0.04),而IIb期和IIIa期肿瘤患者之间的比较没有显示出任何显著差异(P=0.20)。此外,新的N类别有效地对患者的生存进行了分层(P<0.001)。通过多因素分析表明,与根治性切除一起,这种最新分类是生存的独立预测因素(风险比,6.25;95%置信区间,3.81-10.26;P<0.001)。总之,新更新的UICC TNM分类可以有效地反映接受手术治疗的GBC患者的临床结局。此外,肿瘤位置可以预测接受手术治疗的T2 GBC患者的生存情况。通过受累淋巴结数量对N类别进行的新分类也被证明是有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a4e/6126185/026be07c59ad/ol-16-04-4427-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a4e/6126185/75456cf442d1/ol-16-04-4427-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a4e/6126185/026be07c59ad/ol-16-04-4427-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a4e/6126185/75456cf442d1/ol-16-04-4427-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a4e/6126185/026be07c59ad/ol-16-04-4427-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic validation of the updated 8th edition Tumor-Node-Metastasis classification by the Union for International Cancer Control: Survival analyses of 307 patients with surgically treated gallbladder carcinoma.国际癌症控制联盟对第8版肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期系统更新版的预后验证:307例接受手术治疗的胆囊癌患者的生存分析
Oncol Lett. 2018 Oct;16(4):4427-4433. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9189. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
2
Prognostic Significance of Tumor Location in T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Korea Tumor Registry System Biliary Pancreas (KOTUS-BP) Database Analysis.T2期胆囊癌肿瘤位置的预后意义:韩国肿瘤登记系统胆道胰腺(KOTUS-BP)数据库分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 12;9(10):3268. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103268.
3
The applicability of new TNM classification for humanpapilloma virus-related oropharyngeal cancer in the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system in Japan: A single-centre study.日本第8版美国癌症联合委员会/国际抗癌联盟(AJCC/UICC)TNM分期系统中新型TNM分类对人乳头瘤病毒相关口咽癌的适用性:一项单中心研究。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018 Jun;45(3):558-565. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
4
Validation of the oncologic effect of hepatic resection for T2 gallbladder cancer: a retrospective study.验证肝切除术治疗 T2 期胆囊癌的肿瘤学疗效:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jan 7;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1556-6.
5
Prognostic Significance of Tumor Location in T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.T2期胆囊癌肿瘤位置的预后意义:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 28;10(15):3317. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153317.
6
Clinicopathological Differences in T2 Gallbladder Cancer According to Tumor Location.根据肿瘤位置的不同,T2 期胆囊癌的临床病理差异。
Cancer Control. 2020 Jan-Dec;27(1):1073274820915514. doi: 10.1177/1073274820915514.
7
[Analysis of the survival in patients after surgical resection of thoracic esophageal cancer].[胸段食管癌手术切除术后患者的生存分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Jul;31(7):541-5.
8
[The Comparison between 6th and 7th International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer Classification for Survival Prognosis of Gastric Cancer].[国际抗癌联盟/美国癌症联合委员会第6版与第7版胃癌生存预后分类的比较]
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov 25;58(5):258-63. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2011.58.5.258.
9
Updates in the Eighth Edition of the Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging Classification for Urologic Cancers.第八版泌尿生殖系统癌症肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期分类更新。
Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):560-569. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.018. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
10
Prognostic implications of the seventh edition of the international union against cancer classification for patients with gastric cancer: the Western experience of patients treated in a single-center European institution.国际抗癌联盟第七版分类对胃癌患者预后的影响:单一中心欧洲机构治疗的患者的西方经验。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 10;31(2):263-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.4315. Epub 2012 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic factors in gallbladder cancer: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.胆囊癌的预后因素:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2025 Jun 1;14(3):374-397. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-502. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
2
Update on the Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Prognostication of Gallbladder Cancer.影像学在胆囊癌诊断、分期及预后评估中的作用进展
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2024 Aug 26;35(2):218-233. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1789243. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Prognostic evaluation in gallbladder carcinoma: Introducing a composite risk model integrating nutritional and immune markers.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical epidemiological survey of gallbladder carcinoma in northwestern China, 2009-2013: 2379 cases in 17 centers.2009 - 2013年中国西北地区胆囊癌临床流行病学调查:17个中心的2379例病例
Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2017 Feb 22;3(1):60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2017.01.003. eCollection 2017 Mar 25.
2
Impact of Type of Surgery on Survival Outcome in Patients With Early Gallbladder Cancer in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery: Oncologic Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery.微创手术时代早期胆囊癌患者手术方式对生存结局的影响:腹腔镜手术的肿瘤学安全性
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(22):e3675. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003675.
3
胆囊癌的预后评估:引入整合营养和免疫标志物的综合风险模型。
Biomol Biomed. 2025 Jan 14;25(2):425-435. doi: 10.17305/bb.2024.10673.
4
Preoperative MRI-based nomogram to predict survival after curative resection in patients with gallbladder cancer: a retrospective multicenter analysis.基于术前 MRI 的列线图预测胆囊癌根治性切除术后患者的生存:一项回顾性多中心分析。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Nov;49(11):3847-3861. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04444-z. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
5
Standardized lymph node dissection for gallbladder cancer under laparoscopy: en-bloc resection technique.腹腔镜下胆囊癌标准化淋巴结清扫术:整块切除技术
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 May 8;408(1):183. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02924-2.
6
Subserosal vascular density predicts oncological features of T2 gallbladder cancer.浆膜下血管密度可预测T2期胆囊癌的肿瘤学特征。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Feb 1;408(1):73. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02823-6.
7
Giant Gallbladder Tumor, Unusual Cancer-Case Report and Short Review of Literature.巨大胆囊肿瘤,罕见癌症——病例报告及文献简短综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 5;13(2):194. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13020194.
8
Circulating miR-141 as a potential biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic targets in gallbladder cancer.循环 miR-141 作为胆囊癌诊断、预后和治疗靶点的潜在生物标志物。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 16;12(1):10072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13430-8.
9
Prognostic Significance of Tumor Location in T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.T2期胆囊癌肿瘤位置的预后意义:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 28;10(15):3317. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153317.
10
The giant resectable carcinoma of gall bladder-a case report.巨大可切除胆囊癌 1 例报告。
BMC Surg. 2021 Mar 16;21(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01117-2.
Gallbladder Cancer in the 21st Century.
21世纪的胆囊癌
J Oncol. 2015;2015:967472. doi: 10.1155/2015/967472. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
4
Is Laparoscopy Contraindicated for Gallbladder Cancer? A 10-Year Prospective Cohort Study.腹腔镜检查对胆囊癌是否为禁忌?一项为期10年的前瞻性队列研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Oct;221(4):847-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
5
Gallbladder cancer: expert consensus statement.胆囊癌:专家共识声明。
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Aug;17(8):681-90. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12444.
6
Lymph node status after resection for gallbladder adenocarcinoma: prognostic implications of different nodal staging/scoring systems.胆囊腺癌切除术后的淋巴结状态:不同淋巴结分期/评分系统的预后意义
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar;111(3):299-305. doi: 10.1002/jso.23813. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
7
Tumor location is a strong predictor of tumor progression and survival in T2 gallbladder cancer: an international multicenter study.肿瘤位置是T2期胆囊癌肿瘤进展和生存的有力预测指标:一项国际多中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):733-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000728.
8
Management of incidental and suspicious gallbladder cancer: focus on early referral to a tertiary centre.意外发现及可疑胆囊癌的管理:重点在于早期转诊至三级医疗中心。
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Jul;16(7):641-7. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12189. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
9
Radical lymph node dissection and assessment: Impact on gallbladder cancer prognosis.根治性淋巴结清扫与评估:对胆囊癌预后的影响。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug 21;19(31):5150-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i31.5150.
10
Is extended hemihepatectomy plus pancreaticoduodenectomy justified for advanced bile duct cancer and gallbladder cancer?对于晚期胆管癌和胆囊癌,扩大半肝切除术加胰十二指肠切除术是否合理?
Surgery. 2013 Jun;153(6):794-800. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.11.024. Epub 2013 Feb 13.