• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“看到剩余部分”:透明窗口位置对产品评估的影响。

"Seeing What's Left": The Effect of Position of Transparent Windows on Product Evaluation.

作者信息

Simmonds Gregory, Woods Andy T, Spence Charles

机构信息

Crossmodal Research Laboratory, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Anna Watts Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter Woodstock Road, OX2 6GG Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Foods. 2018 Sep 13;7(9):151. doi: 10.3390/foods7090151.

DOI:10.3390/foods7090151
PMID:30217090
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6164523/
Abstract

The position of design elements on product packaging has been shown to exert a measurable impact on consumer perception across a number of different studies and product categories. Design elements previously found to influence the consumer through their positioning on the front of pack include product imagery, brand logos, text-based claims, and basic shapes. However, as yet, no empirical research has focused specifically on the relative position of transparent windows; despite the latter being an increasingly prevalent element of many modern packaging designs. This exploratory online study details an experimental investigation of how manipulating the position of a transparent window on a range of visually-presented, novel packaging designs influences consumer evaluations and judgements of the product seen within. Specifically, 110 participants rated 24 different packaging designs (across four product categories: granola, boxed chocolates, pasta, and lemon mousse; each with six window positions: in one of the four quadrants, the top half, or the bottom half) in a within-participants experimental design. Analyses were conducted using Friedman's tests and Hochberg procedure-adjusted Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests. Window position was found to be a non-trivial element of design, with a general preference for windows on the right-hand side being evidenced. Significantly higher scores for expected product tastiness and design attractiveness were consistently identified across all product categories when windows were positioned on the right- vs. left-hand side of the packaging. Effects on the perception of powerfulness, overall liking, quality, and willingness to purchase were identified, but were inconsistent across the different product categories. Very few effects of window verticality were identified, with expected weight of the product not being significantly influenced by window position. The implications of these findings for academics, designers, and brand managers are discussed, with future research directions highlighted.

摘要

在许多不同的研究和产品类别中,产品包装上设计元素的位置已被证明会对消费者认知产生可衡量的影响。先前发现,通过其在包装正面的位置影响消费者的设计元素包括产品图像、品牌标识、文字声明和基本形状。然而,迄今为止,尚无实证研究专门关注透明窗口的相对位置;尽管透明窗口在许多现代包装设计中越来越普遍。这项探索性在线研究详细介绍了一项实验调查,该调查研究了在一系列视觉呈现的新颖包装设计上操纵透明窗口的位置如何影响消费者对其中所见产品的评价和判断。具体而言,110名参与者在参与者内实验设计中对24种不同的包装设计(涵盖四种产品类别:格兰诺拉麦片、盒装巧克力、意大利面和柠檬慕斯;每种有六个窗口位置:四个象限之一、上半部分或下半部分)进行了评分。使用弗里德曼检验和霍奇伯格程序调整的威尔科克森符号秩检验进行分析。发现窗口位置是一个重要的设计元素,有证据表明人们普遍偏好右侧的窗口。当窗口位于包装的右侧而非左侧时,在所有产品类别中一致发现预期产品美味度和设计吸引力的得分显著更高。确定了对力量感、总体喜好、质量和购买意愿的感知有影响,但在不同产品类别中并不一致。几乎没有发现窗口垂直性的影响,产品的预期重量不受窗口位置的显著影响。讨论了这些发现对学者、设计师和品牌经理的启示,并强调了未来的研究方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fcf/6164523/86157e39d167/foods-07-00151-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fcf/6164523/eb3a0ccd5100/foods-07-00151-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fcf/6164523/86157e39d167/foods-07-00151-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fcf/6164523/eb3a0ccd5100/foods-07-00151-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fcf/6164523/86157e39d167/foods-07-00151-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
"Seeing What's Left": The Effect of Position of Transparent Windows on Product Evaluation.“看到剩余部分”:透明窗口位置对产品评估的影响。
Foods. 2018 Sep 13;7(9):151. doi: 10.3390/foods7090151.
2
Transparent Windows on Food Packaging Do Not Always Capture Attention and Increase Purchase Intention.食品包装上的透明窗口并不总能吸引注意力并提高购买意愿。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 12;11:593690. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.593690. eCollection 2020.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
"Their Packaging Has Always Been Like a Power": A Qualitative Study of U.S. Smokers' Perceptions of Cigarette Pack Visual Design Features to Inform Product Regulation.“其包装一直如一股力量”:一项关于美国吸烟者对香烟包装视觉设计特征认知的定性研究,以为产品监管提供信息
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 17;14(10):1234. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101234.
5
The impact of cigarette pack shape, size and opening: evidence from tobacco company documents.烟包形状、尺寸和开口的影响:来自烟草公司文件的证据。
Addiction. 2013 Sep;108(9):1658-68. doi: 10.1111/add.12183. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
6
Impact of smokeless tobacco packaging on perceptions and beliefs among youth, young adults, and adults in the U.S: findings from an internet-based cross-sectional survey.美国青年、成年人群体对无烟气烟草包装的认知和看法的影响:基于互联网的横断面调查结果。
Harm Reduct J. 2014 Jan 17;11:2. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-11-2.
7
The Effect of Cigarillo Packaging Characteristics on Young Adult Perceptions and Intentions: An Experimental Study.小雪茄包装特征对年轻成年人认知及购买意愿的影响:一项实验研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 19;18(8):4330. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084330.
8
Persuasive packaging? The impact of packaging color and claims on young consumers' perceptions of product healthiness, sustainability and tastiness.有说服力的包装?包装颜色和声明对年轻消费者对产品健康、可持续性和美味感知的影响。
Appetite. 2023 Mar 1;182:106433. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106433. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
9
Perceptions of plain packaging and health warning labels for cannabis among young adults: findings from an experimental study.年轻人对大麻平装和健康警示标签的看法:一项实验研究的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 10;18(1):1361. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6247-2.
10
Packaging Communication as a Tool to Reduce Disgust with Insect-Based Foods: Effect of Informative and Visual Elements.将包装宣传作为减少对昆虫类食品反感的工具:信息性和视觉元素的影响
Foods. 2023 Sep 28;12(19):3606. doi: 10.3390/foods12193606.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting a hand sanitizer by persuasive messages: moving bottle and background color as approach and avoidance cues.通过说服性信息推广洗手液:移动瓶子和背景颜色作为趋近和回避线索。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Sep 15:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03632-8.
2
Visual communication via the design of food and beverage packaging.通过食品和饮料包装设计进行视觉传达。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 May 12;7(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00391-9.
3
Transparent Windows on Food Packaging Do Not Always Capture Attention and Increase Purchase Intention.

本文引用的文献

1
How Strong Is Your Coffee? The Influence of Visual Metaphors and Textual Claims on Consumers' Flavor Perception and Product Evaluation.你的咖啡有多浓?视觉隐喻和文字描述对消费者风味感知及产品评价的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 5;9:53. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00053. eCollection 2018.
2
Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review.通过互联网进行感知研究:教程综述
PeerJ. 2015 Jul 23;3:e1058. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1058. eCollection 2015.
3
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research.纯粹确证性研究议程
食品包装上的透明窗口并不总能吸引注意力并提高购买意愿。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 12;11:593690. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.593690. eCollection 2020.
4
Visual Design Cues Impacting Food Choice: A Review and Future Research Agenda.影响食物选择的视觉设计线索:综述与未来研究议程
Foods. 2020 Oct 19;9(10):1495. doi: 10.3390/foods9101495.
5
Sensory Nudges: The Influences of Environmental Contexts on Consumers' Sensory Perception, Emotional Responses, and Behaviors toward Foods and Beverages.感官引导:环境背景对消费者对食品和饮料的感官感知、情绪反应及行为的影响
Foods. 2020 Apr 17;9(4):509. doi: 10.3390/foods9040509.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):632-8. doi: 10.1177/1745691612463078.
4
When to use the Bonferroni correction.何时使用邦费罗尼校正。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Sep;34(5):502-8. doi: 10.1111/opo.12131. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
5
Using Effect Size-or Why the P Value Is Not Enough.使用效应量——为何P值并不足够。
J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Sep;4(3):279-82. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1.
6
False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.虚假阳性心理学:在数据收集和分析中不披露的灵活性使得任何事物都可以被呈现为显著的。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417632. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
7
Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.效应量、置信区间与统计显著性:生物学家实用指南
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 Nov;82(4):591-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x.
8
Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power.殿下:垂直位置作为权力的感知符号。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Jul;89(1):1-21. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.1.
9
The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: preliminary test of a theoretical model.身高对职场成功与收入的影响:一个理论模型的初步检验
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Jun;89(3):428-41. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.428.
10
Multiple comparison procedures updated.多重比较程序已更新。
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1998 Dec;25(12):1032-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1998.tb02179.x.