Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Oct 30;84(22). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01886-18. Print 2018 Nov 15.
and are two bacteria that are members of the family. Both are commonly found in beehives and have historically been difficult to distinguish from each other due to related genetic and phenotypic characteristics and a shared ecological niche. Here, we discuss the likely mischaracterization of three 16S rRNA sequences previously published as and provide the phylogenetic evidence that supported the GenBank reassignment of the sequences as We explore the issues that arise by using only 16S rRNA or other single-gene analyses to distinguish between these bacteria. We also present three sets of molecular markers, two sets that distinguish from and other closely related species within the genus and a third set that distinguishes from and other closely related species within the genus. These molecular markers provide a tool for proper identification of these oft-mistaken species. 16S rRNA gene sequencing in bacteria has long been held as the gold standard for typing bacteria and, for the most part, is an excellent method of taxonomically identifying different bacterial species. However, the high level of 16S rRNA sequence similarity of some published strains of and , as well as possible horizontal gene transfer events within their shared ecological niche, complicates the use of 16S rRNA sequence as an effective molecular marker for differentiating these two species. Additionally, shared characteristics of these bacteria limit the effectiveness of using traditional phenotypic identification assays, such as the catalase test. The results from this study provide PCR methods to quickly differentiate between these two genera and will be useful when studying , , and other disease-relevant bacteria commonly found in beehives.
和 是两种属于 科的细菌。两者通常在蜂巢中发现,由于遗传和表型特征相关以及生态位共享,历史上难以将它们彼此区分开来。在这里,我们讨论了以前发表的三个 16S rRNA 序列被错误地描述为 的可能性,并提供了支持将这些序列在 GenBank 中重新归类为 的系统发育证据。我们探讨了仅使用 16S rRNA 或其他单基因分析来区分这些细菌所带来的问题。我们还介绍了三套分子标记,其中两套可区分 和 属内的其他密切相关的物种,第三套可区分 和 属内的其他密切相关的物种。这些分子标记为正确识别这些经常被混淆的物种提供了工具。细菌的 16S rRNA 基因测序长期以来一直被认为是细菌分型的金标准,在大多数情况下,它是一种极好的分类鉴定不同细菌物种的方法。然而,一些发表的 和 菌株的 16S rRNA 序列高度相似,以及它们在共同生态位内可能发生的水平基因转移事件,使得 16S rRNA 序列作为区分这两个物种的有效分子标记变得复杂。此外,这些细菌的共同特征限制了使用传统表型鉴定方法(如过氧化氢酶试验)的有效性。本研究提供了快速区分这两个属的 PCR 方法,在研究与蜜蜂相关的疾病有关的细菌,如 、 和其他细菌时将非常有用。