• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Dynamic Impact of Natural Resource Rents, Financial Development, and Technological Innovations on Environmental Quality: Empirical Evidence from BRI Economies.自然资源租金、金融发展和技术创新对环境质量的动态影响:来自“一带一路”经济体的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010130.
2
Roles of natural resources, globalization, and technological innovations in mitigation of environmental degradation in BRI economies.自然资源、全球化和技术创新在缓解“一带一路”经济体环境退化方面的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0265755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265755. eCollection 2022.
3
Maximizing natural resource rent economics: The role of human capital development, financial sector development, and open-trade economies in driving technological innovation.最大化自然资源租金经济学:人力资本发展、金融部门发展和开放贸易经济体在推动技术创新中的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(3):4453-4477. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31373-z. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
4
Remittance inflows affect the ecological footprint in BICS countries: do technological innovation and financial development matter?汇款流入对BICS国家的生态足迹有影响:技术创新和金融发展重要吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(18):23482-23500. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12400-3. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
5
The dynamic impact of financial, technological, and natural resources on sustainable development in Belt and Road countries.金融、技术和自然资源对“一带一路”国家可持续发展的动态影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(3):4616-4631. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15900-4. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
6
The nexus of financial development, natural resource rents, technological innovation, foreign direct investment, energy consumption, human capital, and trade on environmental degradation in the new BRICS economies.金砖国家新经济体的金融发展、自然资源租金、技术创新、外国直接投资、能源消耗、人力资本和贸易与环境退化的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(49):74442-74457. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20976-7. Epub 2022 May 31.
7
Does interaction between technological innovation and natural resource rent impact environmental degradation in newly industrialized countries? New evidence from method of moments quantile regression.技术创新与自然资源租金之间的相互作用是否会影响新兴工业化国家的环境恶化?矩量分位数回归方法的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(2):3162-3169. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17631-y. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
8
Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries.技术创新、金融发展、可再生能源与生态足迹的动态关系:基于亚太经合组织国家 STIRPAT 模型的新见解。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(12):15519-15536. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11640-z. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
9
Nexus between financial development, energy consumption, income level, and ecological footprint in CEE countries: do human capital and biocapacity matter?中东欧国家金融发展、能源消耗、收入水平与生态足迹的关系:人力资本和生物承载力重要吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Nov;26(31):31856-31872. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06343-z. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
10
The role of quality institutions and technological innovations in environmental sustainability: Panel data analysis of BRI countries.质量机构和技术创新在环境可持续性中的作用:对“一带一路”国家的面板数据分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287543. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating the path to environmental sustainability: Insights from CIVETS on the intersection of ICT diffusion, natural resources, and green technological innovation.探索环境可持续发展之路:来自“CIVETS”国家关于信息通信技术传播、自然资源与绿色技术创新交叉点的见解。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0309264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309264. eCollection 2024.
2
Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve: assessing the impact of climate policy uncertainty in the Belt and Road Initiative.重新审视环境库兹涅茨曲线:评估“一带一路”倡议中气候政策不确定性的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):10579-10593. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31471-y. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
3
Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Analysis of Government Expenditure and the Causal Effect.经济增长与环境质量:政府支出与因果效应分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 26;19(17):10629. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710629.
4
Does governance impact on the financial development-carbon dioxide emissions nexus in G20 countries.治理对 G20 国家金融发展-二氧化碳排放关系的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 22;17(8):e0273546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273546. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
How FDI and technology innovation mitigate CO emissions in high-tech industries: evidence from province-level data of China.FDI 和技术创新如何缓解高科技产业的 CO 排放:来自中国省级数据的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(3):4641-4653. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15946-4. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
2
How does technological innovation mitigate CO emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression.技术创新如何减轻经合组织国家的二氧化碳排放?面板分位数回归的异质分析。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111818. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111818. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
3
Transmission channels between financial development and emissions: A global perspective.金融发展与排放之间的传导渠道:全球视角
Heliyon. 2020 Nov 18;6(11):e05509. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05509. eCollection 2020 Nov.
4
Does green investment, financial development and natural resources rent limit carbon emissions? A provincial panel analysis of China.绿色投资、金融发展和自然资源租金是否限制了碳排放?基于中国省级面板数据的分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 10;755(Pt 2):142538. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142538. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Does Innovation Efficiency Suppress the Ecological Footprint? Empirical Evidence from 280 Chinese Cities.创新效率是否抑制了生态足迹?来自中国 280 个城市的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;17(18):6826. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186826.
6
The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: Fresh evidence from the United States of America.自然资源、能源消耗和人口增长对环境质量的影响:来自美利坚合众国的新证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 1;754:142222. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142222. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
7
Renewable energy, economic development, and ecological footprint nexus: fresh evidence of renewable energy environment Kuznets curve (RKC) from income groups.可再生能源、经济发展和生态足迹的关系:收入群体的可再生能源环境库兹涅茨曲线(RKC)的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jan;28(2):2031-2051. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10485-w. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
8
The nexus of carbon emissions, financial development, renewable energy consumption, and technological innovation: What should be the priorities in light of COP 21 Agreements?碳排放、金融发展、可再生能源消费和技术创新的关系:根据《巴黎协定》,应该优先考虑什么?
J Environ Manage. 2020 Oct 1;271:111027. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111027. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
9
Foreign investment and air pollution: Do good governance and technological innovation matter?外商投资与空气污染:良好治理和技术创新是否重要?
Environ Res. 2020 Jun;185:109469. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109469. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
10
Does financial development and foreign direct investment improve environmental quality? Evidence from belt and road countries.金融发展和外国直接投资是否能改善环境质量?来自“一带一路”国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jul;27(19):23586-23601. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08748-7. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

自然资源租金、金融发展和技术创新对环境质量的动态影响:来自“一带一路”经济体的经验证据。

The Dynamic Impact of Natural Resource Rents, Financial Development, and Technological Innovations on Environmental Quality: Empirical Evidence from BRI Economies.

机构信息

School of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100029, China.

School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010130.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19010130
PMID:35010393
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8750720/
Abstract

Until recently, many countries' policies were motivated by economic growth; however, few strategies were developed to prevent environmental deterioration including reducing the ecological footprint. In this context, the purpose of this study was to analyze the role of natural resource rents, technological innovation, and financial development on the ecological footprint in 90 Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) economies. This research divided the BRI economies into high income, middle-income, and low-income levels to capture income differences. This research used the second-generation panel unit root, cointegration, and augmented mean group estimators to calculate the robust and reliable outcomes. Based on the annual data from 1991 to 2018, the findings show that natural resource rents drastically damage the quality of the environment, whereas technological innovations are helpful in reducing ecological footprint. Moreover, the outcome of the interaction term (natural resource rents and technological innovations) negatively impacts the ecological footprint. Interestingly, these findings were similar in the three income groups. In addition, financial development improved environmental quality in the middle-income BRI economies, but reduced it in high-income, low-income, and full sample countries. Furthermore, the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) concept has been validated across all BRI economies. Policymakers in BRI countries should move resources away from resource-rich sectors of industries/manufacturing sectors to enhance/promote economic growth and use these NRRs efficiently for a progressive, sustainable environment. Based on these findings, several efficient policy suggestions are proposed.

摘要

直到最近,许多国家的政策都是以经济增长为动力的;然而,很少有策略是为了防止环境恶化而制定的,包括减少生态足迹。在这种情况下,本研究的目的是分析自然资源租金、技术创新和金融发展对 90 个“一带一路”倡议(BRI)经济体生态足迹的影响。本研究将 BRI 经济体分为高收入、中等收入和低收入水平,以捕捉收入差异。本研究使用第二代面板单位根、协整和扩展均值组估计量来计算稳健可靠的结果。基于 1991 年至 2018 年的年度数据,研究结果表明,自然资源租金严重破坏了环境质量,而技术创新有助于减少生态足迹。此外,自然资源租金和技术创新的交互项的结果对生态足迹有负面影响。有趣的是,这一发现在三个收入组中是相似的。此外,金融发展改善了中等收入 BRI 经济体的环境质量,但在高收入、低收入和全样本国家中却降低了环境质量。此外,所有 BRI 经济体都验证了环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)的概念。BRI 国家的政策制定者应该将资源从资源丰富的行业/制造业部门转移出去,以促进/促进经济增长,并有效地利用这些自然资源租金来实现可持续的环境。基于这些发现,提出了一些有效的政策建议。