Suppr超能文献

两种用于粪类圆线虫血清学诊断的商业检测方法的比较研究。

Comparative study of two commercial tests for Strongyloides stercoralis serologic diagnosis.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Avenida de Córdoba s/n, Madrid, Spain.

Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Dec 1;112(12):561-567. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/try101.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Serological diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis is often limited by its low specificity due to cross-reactivity with other parasitic nematodes. Novel serological tests assumed to be more specific have been recently developed. The aim of our study was to compare two commercial tests based on different antigens for S. stercoralis diagnosis in humans from a non-endemic area.

METHODS

A retrospective laboratory-based study was conducted in the Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. Samples from patients with a requested S. stercoralis serology from January 2013 to October 2016 were tested with two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests (crude larval suspension ELISA [CrAg-ELISA] and recombinant antigen ELISA [NIE-ELISA]). Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated using primary and composite gold standards. The κ index was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 249 samples from 233 patients were tested (κ=0.735). The CrAg-ELISA yielded sensitivities from 89.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80.7 to 94.2) to 94.7% (95% CI 75.4 to 99.0) and the NIE-ELISA from 72.3% (95% CI 58.2 to 83.1) to 78.9% (95% CI 56.7 to 91.5). Specificity ranged from 72.3% (95% CI 58.2 to 83.1) to 89.3% (95% CI 83.1 to 93.4) for the CrAg-ELISA and from 85.1% (95% CI 72.3 to 92.6) to 93.6% (95% CI 88.2 to 96.6) for the NIE-ELISA.

CONCLUSIONS

The NIE-ELISA is more specific than the CrAg-ELISA, but its low sensitivity limits its use in S. stercoralis screening. New diagnostic tests are needed for the diagnosis of S. stercoralis.

摘要

背景

由于与其他寄生线虫的交叉反应,旋毛虫血清学诊断的特异性往往较低。最近开发了一些假定更具特异性的新型血清学检测方法。我们的研究目的是比较两种基于不同抗原的商业检测方法,用于诊断来自非流行地区的人类旋毛虫感染。

方法

这是一项在西班牙马德里 12 月 12 日大学医院进行的回顾性实验室研究。对 2013 年 1 月至 2016 年 10 月间要求进行旋毛虫血清学检测的患者的样本进行了两种商业酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测(粗幼虫悬浮液 ELISA [CrAg-ELISA]和重组抗原 ELISA [NIE-ELISA])。使用原始和复合金标准计算敏感性、特异性和预测值。计算κ指数。

结果

共检测了 233 名患者的 249 份样本(κ=0.735)。CrAg-ELISA 的敏感性从 89.2%(95%置信区间 [CI] 80.7 至 94.2)到 94.7%(95% CI 75.4 至 99.0),NIE-ELISA 的敏感性从 72.3%(95% CI 58.2 至 83.1)到 78.9%(95% CI 56.7 至 91.5)。CrAg-ELISA 的特异性范围为 72.3%(95% CI 58.2 至 83.1)至 89.3%(95% CI 83.1 至 93.4),NIE-ELISA 的特异性范围为 85.1%(95% CI 72.3 至 92.6)至 93.6%(95% CI 88.2 至 96.6)。

结论

NIE-ELISA 比 CrAg-ELISA 更具特异性,但敏感性较低,限制了其在旋毛虫筛查中的应用。需要新的诊断试验来诊断旋毛虫感染。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验