Pieper Marjoleine J C, Achterberg Wilco P, van der Steen Jenny T, Francke Anneke L
Amsterdam Public Health (APH) research institute, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, NL.
Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, NL.
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Sep 7;18(3):15. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3973.
A stepwise, multidisciplinary and multicomponent intervention (called STA OP!) was implemented in Dutch nursing home units, which included a comprehensive multidisciplinary team training. A cluster-randomised controlled trial showed that the intervention reduced symptoms of pain and challenging behaviour.
To describe the experiences around the implementation of the intervention; to examine the extent to which the STA OP! intervention was delivered and implemented as intended (at the level of the team, and the individual resident/professional); and to understand factors influencing the implementation process.
A process evaluation was performed using a mixed-methods design encompassing several data sources. Quantitative data (i.e. from the written evaluations by healthcare professionals, management, and the research database) were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data (i.e. semi-structured interviews, notes, completed intervention forms, and written evaluations) were analysed according to the principles of thematic analysis. The implementation process and the influencing factors were categorised according to the i) organisational level, ii) the team level, and iii) the level of the individual resident/professional.
In total, 39.2% of the residents with pain and/or challenging behaviour were treated following the stepwise approach of the STA OP! intervention. The training manual and forms used were found to be relevant and feasible. Factors inhibiting the implementation process at the i) organisational level concerned instability of the organisation and the team (e.g. involvement in multiple projects/new innovations, staff turnover/absence of essential disciplines, and/or high workload). At the team level (ii), we found that presence of a person with a motivational leadership style facilitated the implementation. Also, interdisciplinary cooperation through the design/setting of the multidisciplinary training, securing the intervention by use of clear agreements, and written reporting or transfers facilitated implementation. At the individual level (iii), perceived value of the stepwise working method, and enhanced awareness facilitated the implementation.
Although the intervention was not implemented as planned, the intervention empowered healthcare professionals and increased their awareness of the signals of pain and challenging behaviour. Future implementation of the intervention should start on units with a motivational leader, and specific features of the organisation and the team should be considered to facilitate implementation, e.g. stability, support, and shared focus to change.
一种逐步推进的、多学科多组分干预措施(称为STA OP!)在荷兰养老院单元实施,其中包括全面的多学科团队培训。一项整群随机对照试验表明,该干预措施减轻了疼痛症状和具有挑战性的行为。
描述干预措施实施过程中的经验;检查STA OP!干预措施在何种程度上按预期实施(在团队层面以及个体居民/专业人员层面);并了解影响实施过程的因素。
采用混合方法设计进行过程评估,涵盖多个数据源。定量数据(即来自医疗保健专业人员、管理人员的书面评估以及研究数据库)采用描述性统计进行分析。定性数据(即半结构化访谈、笔记、填写完整的干预表格以及书面评估)根据主题分析原则进行分析。实施过程和影响因素根据以下方面进行分类:i)组织层面,ii)团队层面,iii)个体居民/专业人员层面。
总共有39.2%有疼痛和/或具有挑战性的行为的居民按照STA OP!干预措施的逐步方法接受了治疗。所使用的培训手册和表格被认为是相关且可行的。在i)组织层面抑制实施过程的因素涉及组织和团队的不稳定(例如参与多个项目/新创新、人员流动/关键学科人员缺失以及/或高工作量)。在团队层面(ii),我们发现具有激励型领导风格的人员的存在促进了实施。此外,通过多学科培训的设计/设置进行跨学科合作、通过明确协议确保干预措施的实施以及书面报告或交接促进了实施。在个体层面(iii),对逐步工作方法的感知价值以及意识的增强促进了实施。
尽管干预措施未按计划实施,但该干预措施增强了医疗保健专业人员的能力,并提高了他们对疼痛信号和具有挑战性的行为的认识。未来干预措施的实施应从有激励型领导者的单元开始,并应考虑组织和团队的具体特征以促进实施,例如稳定性、支持以及对变革的共同关注。