Employment Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Employment Interventions With Homeless Youth.

OBJECTIVE

Limited research exists on how employment interventions contribute to employment outcomes for homeless youth. This study examines the comparative efficacy of 2 interventions-Social Enterprise Intervention (SEI) and Individual Placement and Support (IPS)-provided to homeless youth with mental illness in a randomized controlled trial.

METHOD

Participants were recruited from 1 homeless youth agency in Los Angeles, CA, and randomized to the SEI ( = 36) or IPS ( = 36) conditions. Over 20 months, SEI participants received 4 SEI components, and IPS participants received IPS services based on 8 principles. Data were collected at baseline and follow-up for the primary employment outcome (paid employment) and 5 secondary employment outcomes.

RESULTS

Over 20 months, 39% of SEI participants and 32% of IPS participants reported any paid employment. Across both groups, participants who reported working at baseline had nearly 8 times the odds of working at follow-up ( = 7.91, < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were detected across the full sample or between groups on the primary or secondary employment outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Future effectiveness research is needed to compare the long-term employment outcomes of the SEI and IPS with a more heterogeneous sample of homeless youth using customized homelessness support services and more nuanced employment outcomes.